{"id":1200,"date":"2026-09-12T12:36:14","date_gmt":"2026-09-12T12:36:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/flexo-vs-digital-printing\/"},"modified":"2026-09-12T12:36:14","modified_gmt":"2026-09-12T12:36:14","slug":"flexo-vs-digital-printing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/flexo-vs-digital-printing\/","title":{"rendered":"Flexo vs Digital Printing: Engineering &#038; Cost Breakdown"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"geo-direct-answer-box\" style=\"background:#f0f9ff; border:1px solid #bae6fd; border-left:5px solid #0284c7; border-radius:8px; padding:20px 24px; margin:24px 0 32px 0;\">\n<h4 style=\"margin:0 0 12px 0; color:#0369a1; font-size:1.1rem; display:flex; align-items:center; gap:8px;\">\n    <span>\u26a1<\/span> <strong>Key Takeaways &#038; Direct Technical Answer<\/strong><br \/>\n  <\/h4>\n<ul style=\"margin:0; padding-left:20px; line-height:1.7; color:#0c4a6e; font-size:0.95rem;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Flexo dominates above ~1,500\u20133,000 units; digital wins below with zero plate cost.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Flexo&#8217;s plate compression can reduce ECT by 3\u20137%; digital printing preserves board strength.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Modern single-pass digital presses now hit 90\u2013120 m\/min, narrowing historical speed gaps.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Water-based flexo inks and latex\/UVgel digital systems both satisfy PPWR\/EPR recyclability thresholds.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem;'>Flexo vs Digital Printing: An Engineer&#8217;s Guide to Cost, Quality &#038; Substrate Limits<\/h2>\n<div class=\"post-featured-image\" style=\"margin:28px 0 32px 0; text-align:center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.unsplash.com\/photo-1581092160607-ee22621dd758?auto=format&#038;fit=crop&#038;w=1200&#038;q=80\" alt=\"flexo vs digital printing - Material Science Lab Testing for Paper Tensile and Burst Strength (TadaPack Engineering Guide)\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:12px; box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.07); border:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size:0.84rem; color:#64748b; margin-top:10px; font-style:italic;\">flexo vs digital printing &#8211; Material Science Lab Testing for Paper Tensile and Burst Strength (TadaPack Engineering Guide)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Choosing between flexography and digital printing is not an aesthetic decision \u2014 it is a structural, cost-structure, and compliance decision. The correct answer depends on run length, board grade, ink coverage, and your recyclability obligations under current frameworks. This guide breaks down the engineering trade-offs with current 2026 industrial benchmarks. For broader substrate selection, see our pillar hub on <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/materials-and-processes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">Packaging Materials &#038; Processes<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Process Fundamentals<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Flexography<\/strong> uses relief polymer plates (typically 1.14\u20131.70 mm photopolymer, 35\u201355 Shore A durometer) mounted on anilox rolls with cell volumes of 1.5\u201312 BCM\/in\u00b2. Ink is transferred via doctor blade; impression pressure against the substrate is the critical variable. On corrugated, post-print flexo runs directly on the combined board, while pre-print flexo applies to liner before corrugating \u2014 the latter delivering near-litho quality at high speed.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Digital corrugated printing<\/strong> \u2014 led by single-pass inkjet platforms (HP PageWide T1100S at ~120 m\/min, Sun Chemical\/Xeikon, HP C500 at ~183 m\/min) \u2014 jets water-based pigment or latex inks directly onto the liner with no plate, no anilox, and no impression cylinder compression of the flute structure.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Structural Impact: Why Impression Pressure Matters<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">This is the factor most procurement teams miss. Flexo post-print plates compress against the liner; excessive impression crushes flutes and degrades compression strength. Well-controlled post-print flexo typically reduces Edge Crush Test values by 3\u20137%, while mis-set stations can push losses beyond 10% \u2014 enough to downgrade a box&#8217;s stacking performance. Bursting strength, ring crush, and ECT are validated per <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tappi.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">TAPPI Standard Test Methods for Paper &#038; Board<\/a>, and any printed box specification should state post-print ECT retention as a measurable acceptance criterion.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Digital inkjet applies negligible mechanical pressure, so ECT is preserved. For applications where stacking load is the binding constraint \u2014 tall shelved distribution, e-commerce triple-wall \u2014 digital&#8217;s strength retention can offset its higher per-unit ink cost.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Cost Structure &#038; Break-Even Analysis<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Flexo carries fixed plate costs: $75\u2013$150 per color for polymer plates on thin-mount systems, plus $300\u2013$800 in press setup per SKU. Digital carries zero plate cost but ink costs of roughly $0.60\u2013$1.20 per m\u00b2 versus flexo&#8217;s $0.08\u2013$0.25 per m\u00b2. The crossover point varies by coverage:<\/p>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\" style=\"overflow-x:auto; margin: 28px 0; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.03);\">\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; background:#ffffff;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8fafc; border-bottom:2px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Metric<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Flexo<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Digital<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Break-even run<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">1,500\u20133,000 units<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Sub-1,500 units<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#fafafa; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Setup\/changeover<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">30\u201360 min<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Under 5 min<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Max speed (corrugated)<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">300\u2013450 m\/min<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">90\u2013183 m\/min<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#fafafa; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Ink cost per m\u00b2<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#059669; font-weight:600;\">$0.08\u2013$0.25<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#059669; font-weight:600;\">$0.60\u2013$1.20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">For high-coverage flood coats, the break-even shifts further toward flexo; for 4-color light coverage with variable data, digital wins at even higher volumes. SKUs under 500 units \u2014 seasonal SKUs, regional variants, versioned compliance labels \u2014 are unambiguously digital territory.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Print Quality &#038; Registration Tolerances<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Modern flexo delivers 133\u2013150 LPI with HD\/flexo-cell screening, \u00b10.5 mm registration across stations \u2014 adequate for most retail shipper graphics. Digital resolves 600\u20131200 dpi continuous-tone with \u00b10.1 mm repeatability, supporting photorealistic imagery, brand Pantone simulation (with extended-gamut ink sets), and serialized\/variable QR codes required for GS1 Digital Link and e-commerce traceability programs. Flexo cannot economically do variable data; every unit is a plate impression.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Ink Systems &#038; Regulatory Compliance (PPWR\/EPR)<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Both processes have converged on recyclability-compliant chemistry. Flexo runs water-based acrylic inks at ~30\u201345% solids with low migration \u2014 the default for direct food-contact dry goods and certified platforms. Digital corrugated systems use water-based pigment inkjet (HP&#8217;s bonding-agent-free aqueous chemistry) or latex, both validated for repulpability and OBA-free liner compatibility. Under the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation&#8217;s design-for-recycling criteria and state-level EPR programs in the US (California SB 54 class shifts), both ink families are classified as non-impairing to paper recycling at standard loadings.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">This matters when printing on fiber-based structures like <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/kbd-pulp-mould-packaging-engineering-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">KBD pulp mould packaging<\/a> \u2014 moulded fiber demands low-viscosity inks with deep substrate penetration tolerance, where flexo&#8217;s water-based systems and single-pass inkjet both outperform solvent platforms. Likewise, printing on recycled-content composites such as recycled ocean plastic laminates requires migration-tested ink systems; see our <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/recycled-ocean-plastic-products-b2b-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">recycled ocean plastic sourcing guide<\/a> for substrate pairing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">For sustainability roadmaps, prioritize a <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/materials-and-processes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">mono-material<\/a> strategy: water-based inks on uncoated or water-based-coated kraft liner keep the entire package in a single recycling stream \u2014 a genuine advantage flexo shares with aqueous inkjet, and one neither shares with film-laminated offset.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Selection Framework<\/h2>\n<ol style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Under 1,500 units or variable data:<\/strong> digital, no exceptions.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Above 3,000 units, flood coverage, food contact:<\/strong> flexo, water-based ink system.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Stacking-critical corrugated (high-ECT spec):<\/strong> digital post-print or pre-print flexo \u2014 never aggressive post-print impression.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Mid-volume multi-SKU portfolios:<\/strong> hybrid lines (digital for short SKUs, flexo for A-movers) cut total plate spend 40\u201360%.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Audit your supplier against post-print ECT retention, ink migration documentation, and plate-cost amortization per SKU before locking process allocation across your catalog.<\/p>\n<div class=\"geo-faq-section\" style=\"margin-top:40px; padding-top:24px; border-top:2px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<h2 style=\"color:#0f172a; font-size:1.45rem; margin-bottom:20px;\">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/h2>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">What is the flexo vs digital printing break-even volume for corrugated boxes?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Typically 1,500\u20133,000 units. Below this, digital wins because flexo plate ($75\u2013$150 per color) and setup costs dominate. High-ink-coverage runs shift the crossover higher; light 4-color coverage with variable data favors digital at larger volumes.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">Does flexo printing weaken corrugated boxes?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Yes, modestly. Plate impression pressure typically reduces ECT by 3\u20137% in well-controlled post-print flexo; mis-set stations can exceed 10%. Digital inkjet applies no impression pressure, preserving full board compression strength \u2014 specify post-print ECT retention per TAPPI methods in your acceptance criteria.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">Which process is better for food-safe and PPWR-compliant packaging?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Both. Flexo water-based acrylic inks and water-based pigment\/latex digital inks are low-migration, repulpable, and classified as non-impairing to paper recycling under PPWR design-for-recycling criteria and US EPR programs at standard loadings.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tadapack-b2b-engineering-cta\" style=\"background:linear-gradient(135deg, #0f172a 0%, #1e293b 100%); border-radius:14px; padding:28px 32px; margin:44px 0 24px 0; color:#ffffff; box-shadow:0 10px 25px -5px rgba(15,23,42,0.25); border:1px solid #334155;\">\n<div style=\"display:flex; align-items:flex-start; justify-content:space-between; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:20px;\">\n<div style=\"max-width:640px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:0.8rem; font-weight:700; color:#38bdf8; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:0.06em; margin-bottom:6px;\">\n        \u2699\ufe0f TadaPack Industrial Packaging Engineering\n      <\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color:#ffffff; margin:0 0 10px 0; font-size:1.35rem; font-weight:800; line-height:1.35;\">\n        Engineering Your Next High-Performance Packaging Batch<br \/>\n      <\/h3>\n<p style=\"color:#94a3b8; font-size:0.92rem; line-height:1.65; margin:0;\">\n        From precision CAD dielines to ISTA drop-testing and certified sustainable substrates, TadaPack helps global brands optimize freight cubic volume, minimize shipping breakage, and satisfy European PPWR \/ EPR packaging standards.\n      <\/p>\n<div style=\"display:flex; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:16px; margin-top:14px; font-size:0.82rem; color:#cbd5e1;\">\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>Free CAD Dielines (.AI \/ .DXF)<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>Drop-Test &#038; ECT Optimization<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>PPWR &#038; FSC Compliant<\/strong><\/span>\n      <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex; align-items:center; align-self:center;\">\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"background:#0284c7; color:#ffffff; padding:12px 24px; border-radius:8px; font-weight:700; font-size:0.95rem; text-decoration:none; display:inline-block; transition:all 0.2s; box-shadow:0 4px 12px rgba(2,132,199,0.35);\"><br \/>\n        Request Engineering Sample &rarr;<br \/>\n      <\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@graph\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Article\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/flexo-vs-digital-printing\/#article\",\n      \"headline\": \"Flexo vs Digital Printing: Engineering & Cost Breakdown\",\n      \"description\": \"Flexo vs digital printing compared: plate costs, ink coverage, ECT strength loss, MOQ breakpoints, and 2026 specs to select the right corrugated process.\",\n      \"mainEntityOfPage\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/flexo-vs-digital-printing\/\",\n      \"author\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Person\",\n        \"name\": \"Gabriel Silva\",\n        \"jobTitle\": \"Substrate Testing & Quality Assurance Lead\",\n        \"worksFor\": {\n          \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n          \"name\": \"TadaPack\",\n          \"url\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\"\n        }\n      },\n      \"publisher\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n        \"name\": \"TadaPack\",\n        \"url\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/flexo-vs-digital-printing\/#faq\",\n      \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What is the flexo vs digital printing break-even volume for corrugated boxes?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Typically 1,500\u20133,000 units. Below this, digital wins because flexo plate ($75\u2013$150 per color) and setup costs dominate. High-ink-coverage runs shift the crossover higher; light 4-color coverage with variable data favors digital at larger volumes.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Does flexo printing weaken corrugated boxes?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes, modestly. Plate impression pressure typically reduces ECT by 3\u20137% in well-controlled post-print flexo; mis-set stations can exceed 10%. Digital inkjet applies no impression pressure, preserving full board compression strength \u2014 specify post-print ECT retention per TAPPI methods in your acceptance criteria.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Which process is better for food-safe and PPWR-compliant packaging?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Both. Flexo water-based acrylic inks and water-based pigment\/latex digital inks are low-migration, repulpable, and classified as non-impairing to paper recycling under PPWR design-for-recycling criteria and US EPR programs at standard loadings.\"}}]\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Flexo vs digital printing compared: plate costs, ink coverage, ECT strength loss, MOQ breakpoints, and 2026 specs to select the right corrugated process.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[406,413,103],"class_list":["post-1200","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-materials-and-processes","tag-corrugated-flutes","tag-mono-material","tag-water-based-inks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1200","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1200"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1200\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1200"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1200"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1200"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}