{"id":3391,"date":"2026-10-11T15:15:19","date_gmt":"2026-10-11T15:15:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/right-sizing-corrugated-shippers-for-robotic-case-packers\/"},"modified":"2026-10-11T15:15:19","modified_gmt":"2026-10-11T15:15:19","slug":"right-sizing-corrugated-shippers-for-robotic-case-packers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/right-sizing-corrugated-shippers-for-robotic-case-packers\/","title":{"rendered":"Right-Sizing Corrugated Shippers for Robotic Case Packers"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<div class=\"tldr-box\" style=\"margin:16px 0 24px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0f9ff;border-left:4px solid #0284c7;border-radius:6px;line-height:1.7;\"><strong style=\"color:#0369a1;font-size:16px;\">\u3010TL;DR Executive Direct Answer\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;color:#0f172a;\">Right-size robotic case packer shippers by locking blank-to-erected caliper tolerance at \u00b10.5mm and side-wall clearance at 6\u201310mm for vacuum\/gantry heads, then selecting ECT-32 single-wall or ECT-44 BC double-wall board to satisfy the McKee-derived BCT with a 1.5\u20132.0x safety factor. Validate every candidate dieline under ASTM D642 compression, ASTM D4169 distribution cycles, and ISTA 3A drop sequences before releasing CAD files to production.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"industry-event-box\" style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0fdfa;border-left:4px solid #0d9488;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>PACK EXPO International (PMMI)<\/strong> \u2014 Official expo portal: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.packexpointernational.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.packexpointernational.com\/<\/a><br \/>TadaPack provides rapid 24\u201348 hour structural CAD prototyping, zero tooling fee sampling, and high-impact booth packaging engineering for trade show exhibitors \u2014 including anti-breakage transport shippers for fragile display samples and short-run high-end VIP boxes with zero plate mold fees when booth deadlines compress to under 48\u201372 hours.<\/aside>\n<figure class=\"geo-cover-box\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px 0; text-align:center;\">\n<div class=\"img-crop-box\" style=\"overflow:hidden; position:relative; display:inline-block; max-width:100%; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); border:1px solid #e2e8f0; line-height:0;\">\n    <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.pollinations.ai\/prompt\/8k%20resolution%2C%20Hasselblad%20medium%20format%2C%20photorealistic%2C%20vivid%20colors.%20A%20sleek%2C%20robotic%20arm%20precisely%20loading%20perfectly%20right-sized%20corrugated%20shippers%20onto%20a%20conveyor%20belt%20within%20a%20high-tech%2C%20impeccably%20clean%20factory%20setting.%20Golden%20hour%20volumetric%20lighting%2C%20rim%20lighting%20on%20the%20robotic%20arm%20and%20shippers%2C%20f%2F2.8%20bokeh.%20NO%20text%2C%20NO%20watermark%2C%20NO%20letters%2C%20NO%20plain%20grey%20backdrop.?width=1200&amp;height=675&amp;model=flux&amp;nologo=true&amp;seed=884760\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" alt=\"Right-Sizing Corrugated Shippers for Robotic Case Packers - Design Overview\" title=\"Right-Sizing Corrugated Shippers for Robotic Case Packers\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" style=\"display:block; width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:0; border:none; box-shadow:none; transform:scale(1.07); transform-origin:center 15%;\">\n  <\/div><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px; color:#64748b; margin-top:8px; font-style:italic;\">Figure: Packaging Design Overview (Right-Sizing Corrugated Shippers for Robotic Case Packers)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>1. Why Robotic Case Packing Changes the Dieline Contract<\/h2>\n<p>Robotics integration is reshaping end-of-line economics across PMMI-member plants, but the corrugated shipper remains the single most common root cause of robotic case packer downtime. A case packer is a dimension machine: side-belt friction drives, vacuum plate pick heads, and gantry pushers all assume the blank converts to a rectangular prism within tight dimensional envelopes. When caliper drifts or flap memory fights the Erector, the robot drops or jams the case. Under ASTM D4169 (Standard Practice for Performance Testing of Shipping Containers and Systems), the distribution cycle DC-13 is the customary benchmark for unitized warehouse-to-retail loads; but for robotic lines, the <em>erectability<\/em> envelope is governed before any transit test is run.<\/p>\n<p>Procurement teams must therefore treat the shipper specification as a dual contract: a transit-strength contract (ECT\/BCT per ASTM D642) and a machine-compatibility contract (caliper, warp, score crack, coefficient of friction). TadaPack&#8217;s structural team supplies CAD dielines within 24\u201348 hours so both contracts can be verified on a physical prototype before the robotic integrator signs off.<\/p>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Core Engineering Definition: Edge Crush Test (ECT)\u3011<\/strong><br \/>ECT measures the edgewise compressive force (kN\/m or lb\/in) a corrugated board specimen withstands before structural collapse, per TAPPI Standard T811 and its harmonized ISO 3037 counterpart; ECT is the primary input to the McKee formula for predicting Box Compression Test (BCT) strength. Industrial failure threshold: an ECT-32 board that loses more than 8% of edgewise strength after Cobb 60 water absorption exceeding 35 g\/m\u00b2 (TAPPI T441) will trigger transit delamination and stacking collapse on humid ocean lanes \u2014 always pair ECT spec with a Cobb 60 ceiling on coastal-import SKUs.<\/aside>\n<h2>2. Dimensional Engineering: Caliper, Clearance, and the Machine Envelope<\/h2>\n<p>Right-sizing starts with the robot, not the product. The governing dimensions are: (a) case internal length\/width\/height versus product matrix; (b) blank caliper at the pick points; and (c) flap interference during blank feeding. Typical robotic case packer envelopes for corrugated:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Caliper tolerance:<\/strong> \u00b10.5mm on erected wall caliper; blank caliper per flute \u2014 E-flute \u2248 1.5mm, B-flute \u2248 3.0mm, C-flute \u2248 4.0mm, BC double-wall \u2248 7.0mm.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Vacuum head side clearance:<\/strong> 6\u201310mm minimum between product outer face and case inner wall; below 6mm, cup-style vacuum heads scuff litho-laminated surfaces.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Blank flatness:<\/strong> warp must not exceed 5mm across a 1,200mm blank diagonal; warped blanks mis-feed on mag- or vacuum-belt infeeds.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Score\/hinge integrity:<\/strong> crease crush depth at 0.3\u20130.4mm on the fold line, cutting matrix around 45-durometer, to prevent score cracking on recycled linerboard blends.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In strict accordance with ASTM D642 (Standard Test Method for Determining Compressive Resistance of Shipping Containers), the target BCT must exceed the stacked load demand: BCT<sub>required<\/sub> = (pallet layers \u2212 1) \u00d7 case weight \u00d7 safety factor. As a hypothetical worked example: a 12kg case, 5 layers high (4 layers stacked above), with SF = 1.8, demands BCT \u2265 4 \u00d7 12kgf \u00d7 1.8 \u2248 86.4 kgf. Using the McKee relationship (BCT \u2248 5.87 \u00d7 ECT \u00d7 \u221a(board caliper \u00d7 case perimeter)), an ECT-44 BC double-wall board comfortably clears this, whereas ECT-32 C-flute sits near the margin on tall stacks \u2014 a classic right-sizing decision that must be run per SKU.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:18px 0;padding:14px 18px;background:#eff6ff;border-radius:8px;border:1px solid #bfdbfe;\"><strong>\u3010\ud83d\udca1 Packaging Engineer&#8217;s Quick Q&amp;A\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Q: If the McKee formula derives BCT from ECT, why do overseas enterprise POs still mandate Mullen burst testing?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>A:<\/strong> Direct answer: because legacy PO templates and carrier contracts (and TAPPI Standard T810, 2026 Revision, for Mullen burst) predate universal ECT adoption and remain the contractual gate for damage claims. Mechanical reason: McKee predicts static compression but not puncture and burst behavior from rough handling; Mullen (TAPPI T810) captures multi-directional tensile rupture relevant to corner impacts. Procurement recommendation: negotiate dual-spec \u2014 ECT for stacking\/robotic compression design, Mullen minimum (e.g., 250 lb\/in\u00b2) as a claim-defense floor \u2014 and put both on the drawing title block.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>3. Board &amp; Flute Selection Matrix for Robotic Lines<\/h2>\n<table border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"8\" cellspacing=\"0\" style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:14px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th>Configuration<\/th>\n<th>Caliper<\/th>\n<th>Typical ECT<\/th>\n<th>Robotic Suitability<\/th>\n<th>Governing Standard \/ Test Protocol<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>E-flute single-wall, 200gsm kraft liner<\/td>\n<td>~1.5mm<\/td>\n<td>ECT-20\u201326<\/td>\n<td>Small e-comm mailers; fast vacuum pick; low stack<\/td>\n<td>TAPPI T811 \/ ISO 3037 (ECT)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>B-flute single-wall, ECT-32<\/td>\n<td>~3.0mm<\/td>\n<td>ECT-32<\/td>\n<td>High-speed side-belt erectors; crisp scores; \u22643 layers stacked<\/td>\n<td>ASTM D642 (BCT) \/ TAPPI T811<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>C-flute single-wall, ECT-32<\/td>\n<td>~4.0mm<\/td>\n<td>ECT-32<\/td>\n<td>General robotic case packing; balanced cushioning<\/td>\n<td>ASTM D4169 DC-13 \/ ASTM D642<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>BC double-wall, ECT-44<\/td>\n<td>~7.0mm<\/td>\n<td>ECT-44<\/td>\n<td>Heavy\/fragile display samples; 4\u20135 layer stacking; export lanes<\/td>\n<td>ASTM D642 \/ ISTA 3A<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Litho-laminated E-flute mount on 350gsm CCNB<\/td>\n<td>~1.9mm<\/td>\n<td>ECT-24\u201328<\/td>\n<td>VIP\/booth display boxes; surface must survive vacuum heads<\/td>\n<td>ISO 186:2020 (conditioning)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Compliant with ISO 186:2020 paper conditioning specifications (23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% \u00b1 2% RH), all ECT and BCT figures in the matrix are comparable only when tested on conditioned specimens. Per EU Directive 94\/62\/EC Annex II and the EU PPWR (Regulation (EU) 2024\/1991) packaging waste reduction mandates, all board grades above are fiber-based and recyclable; where PFAS-free barrier coatings are specified for grease or moisture resistance, verify compliance documentation and, for US marketing claims, align with FTC Green Guides (16 CFR Part 260) substantiation rules on recyclable corrugated claims.<\/p>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f1f5f9;border-left:4px solid #475569;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Engineering Lab Bench Test Record \u2014 Hypothetical Verification Protocol Example\u3011<\/strong><br \/>Illustrative test plan structure (not a reported measurement): Conditioning per ASTM D685 at 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% RH; instruments \u2014 Mitutoyo 547-400S digital caliper (caliper, \u00b10.01mm), Lansmont compression tester (BCT per ASTM D642), TAPPI T810 Mullen burst tester; statistical sample \u2014 10-specimen average, tolerance \u00b10.15mm on dimensional checks. TadaPack issues this exact test-plan template with every prototype lot so buyer QA and the robotic integrator test against identical acceptance criteria.<\/aside>\n<h2>4. Four-Step Right-Sizing SOP (Pre-Integration Verification)<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Step 1 \u2014 Product matrix &amp; clearance audit.<\/strong> Measure the product nest (\u00b10.15mm with calipers), add 6\u201310mm per side for vacuum head clearance, and fix internal case dimensions. Confirm kerf-to-score registration on the dieline within \u00b10.15mm; tighter registration prevents corner gaps that bleed vacuum.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 2 \u2014 BCT derivation and board selection.<\/strong> Compute stacked load demand from pallet height, case weight, and warehouse stack factor (use SF 1.8\u20132.0; per ASTM D642 select board so measured BCT \u2265 demand \u00d7 SF). Choose ECT-32 C\/B flute or ECT-44 BC accordingly; verify Mullen floor per TAPPI T810 if contractually required.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 3 \u2014 Machine compatibility verification.<\/strong> Run 20 blank samples on the actual (or simulator) case packer: check blank infeed, flap pop-up (residual flap opening \u2264 3mm after tuck), warp &lt; 5mm\/1,200mm diagonal, and CoF of outer liner (side-belt friction drives typically need CoF \u2265 0.35). Cut creasing matrix to 45-durometer and confirm crease crush depth 0.3\u20130.4mm.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 4 \u2014 Distribution validation.<\/strong> Test the final erected SKU under ASTM D4169 (DC-13 or the cycle matching your lane), plus ISTA 3A General Simulation Performance Testing protocol drop shock sequences for parcel lanes. Freeze the dieline revision and lock it into the PO with the test report attached.<\/p>\n<p>TadaPack supports Steps 1\u20133 with free calculation tools at <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools<\/a> (BCT stacking calculators, dimensional weight, and freight penalty estimators) and returns validated CAD dielines and physical prototypes in 24\u201348 hours with zero tooling fees.<\/p>\n<h2>5. Defect Diagnostics: Troubleshooting Matrix<\/h2>\n<table border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"8\" cellspacing=\"0\" style=\"border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-size:14px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th>Defect<\/th>\n<th>Root Cause<\/th>\n<th>Corrective Action<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Flap popping open on erector infeed<\/td>\n<td>Excess residual stress in scores; recycled liner with high humidity memory; crease crush too shallow<\/td>\n<td>Deepen crease crush to 0.3\u20130.4mm; switch to 45-durometer creasing matrix; specify pre-conditioned board per ISO 186:2020 before converting<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Panel warp causing vacuum pick misses<\/td>\n<td>Moisture gradient between liner and flute (one-sided coating or ocean transit sweat)<\/td>\n<td>Balance coating on both liners; Cobb 60 ceiling \u2264 35 g\/m\u00b2 on import lots; stretch-wrap pallets with desiccant on 30-day ocean lanes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Adhesive debond \/ delamination after transit<\/td>\n<td>Starch bond failure under sustained &gt;85% RH; container sweat on Pacific\/Atlantic routes<\/td>\n<td>Upgrade to wet-strength adhesive spec; verify pin adhesion per TAPPI T821; derate stacking loads per hub matrix below<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Corner crush under pallet top frames<\/td>\n<td>BCT margin below safety factor; layer pad absent<\/td>\n<td>Move up one ECT class (ECT-32 \u2192 ECT-44 BC) or add slip sheets; re-run ASTM D642 verification<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>6. Multi-Regional Logistics Hub Landing &amp; Stacking Derating Matrix<\/h2>\n<p>Corrugated loses 20\u201340% of dry-condition compression strength after prolonged humidity exposure. Plan landing-hub derating explicitly:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>California Inland Empire (FBA ONT8 \/ LGB3):<\/strong> 30-day Pacific ocean transit + coastal humidity drives Cobb absorption; apply stacking derating factor 0.7 on ECT-based BCT for imported lots before they reach dry inland fulfillment.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Texas DFW distribution triangle:<\/strong> hot-dry interior with seasonal storm spikes; derating 0.85 typical, but watch 30\u00b0C+ dry-out embrittlement on low-grammage liners during intermodal dwell.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Port of Rotterdam (EU multimodal rail\/road):<\/strong> Atlantic lanes plus high RH rail dwell; apply 0.65\u20130.70 derating and verify PPWR (2024\/1991) recyclability documentation at EU entry.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>As a hypothetical worked example: a case needing 86.4 kgf dry BCT, imported via Long Beach \u2192 ONT8, should be specified for \u2265 86.4 \/ 0.7 \u2248 124 kgf conditioned BCT \u2014 which pushes the SKU from ECT-32 to ECT-44 BC double-wall. Run your own lane-specific derating interactively with TadaPack&#8217;s calculators at <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools<\/a>.<\/p>\n<section class=\"industry-event-footer\" style=\"margin-top:32px;padding-top:16px;border-top:1px solid #cbd5e1;font-size:13px;color:#475569;\"><strong>References<\/strong><br \/>1. PACK EXPO International (PMMI): <a href=\"https:\/\/www.packexpointernational.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/www.packexpointernational.com\/<\/a><br \/>2. ASTM D642; ASTM D4169; ASTM D685; ISTA 3A General Simulation Performance Testing<br \/>3. TAPPI T810 (2026 Revision) Mullen burst; TAPPI T811\/ISO 3037 ECT; TAPPI T441 Cobb; ISO 186:2020 conditioning<br \/>4. EU Directive 94\/62\/EC Annex II; EU PPWR Regulation (EU) 2024\/1991; FTC Green Guides 16 CFR Part 260<br \/>5. TadaPack structural prototyping &amp; tools: <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools<\/a><\/section>\n<\/article>\n<section class=\"topic-cluster-links\" style=\"margin-top:28px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><h3 style=\"margin-top:0;font-size:17px;color:#1e293b;\">Recommended Engineering Reading<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;padding-left:20px;color:#3b82f6;line-height:1.7;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pass-ista-3a-astm-d4169-with-48-hour-printed-prototypes-expo-demo-carton-strateg\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pass ISTA 3A &#038; ASTM D4169 With 48-Hour Printed Prototypes: Expo Demo Carton Strategy<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/mckee-to-astm-d642-bct-failure-analysis-for-ocean-freight-lightweighting\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">McKee to ASTM D642: BCT Failure Analysis for Ocean Freight Lightweighting<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/section>\n<section class=\"tools-recom-box\" style=\"margin-top:24px;padding:20px;background:#f8fafc;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:8px;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;\"><div style=\"display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;margin-bottom:14px;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:8px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;\"><span style=\"color:#2563eb;font-weight:700;\">[TOOLS]<\/span> Featured Engineering &#038; Calculation Tools<\/h3>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#2563eb;text-decoration:none;font-weight:500;\">Explore 70+ Packaging Tools \u2794<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"tools-grid\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));gap:14px;margin-top:10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/box-compression-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">BCT &#038; Stacking<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Box Compression (BCT) Calculator<\/h4>\nPredict box compressive limit and stacking safety factors via McKee formula.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/edge-crush-test-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">ECT Testing<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Edge Crush Test (ECT) Calculator<\/h4>\nCalculate linerboard ring crush and composite ECT ratings for optimal board specs.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div><\/section>\n<p><!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<!-- Google & AI GEO Schema.org Structured Data --><br \/>\n<!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Engineering playbook for ECT-rated corrugated shippers matched to robotic case packers: caliper tolerances, ASTM D642 BCT, SOP, cost matrix and freight derating.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3391","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-materials-and-processes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3391","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3391"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3391\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3391"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3391"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3391"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}