{"id":3412,"date":"2026-10-12T10:15:42","date_gmt":"2026-10-12T10:15:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/round-corner-die-cut-engineering-ppwr-zero-die-cad-prototyping-cost-teardown\/"},"modified":"2026-10-12T10:15:42","modified_gmt":"2026-10-12T10:15:42","slug":"round-corner-die-cut-engineering-ppwr-zero-die-cad-prototyping-cost-teardown","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/round-corner-die-cut-engineering-ppwr-zero-die-cad-prototyping-cost-teardown\/","title":{"rendered":"Round-Corner Die-Cut Engineering &#038; PPWR: Zero-Die CAD Prototyping Cost Teardown"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<div class=\"tldr-box\" style=\"margin:16px 0 24px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0f9ff;border-left:4px solid #0284c7;border-radius:6px;line-height:1.7;\"><strong style=\"color:#0369a1;font-size:16px;\">\u3010TL;DR Executive Direct Answer\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;color:#0f172a;\">Round-corner die-cut corners of \u22653mm radius on E-flute (1.5mm caliper, ECT-32) board reduce crack initiation by distributing crease stress, while zero-die CAD prototyping eliminates $450\u2013$1,200 tooling charges per SKU revision. Combined with EN 71-3 \/ heavy-metal-free inks and PPWR (2024\/1991) recyclability design rules, structural teams typically trim 12\u201322% from landed packaging cost on hypothetical worked examples for baby skincare and wooden toy shippers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Baby skincare brands and wooden toy exporters face converging pressure: EU PPWR recyclability mandates now audit every substrate, adhesive, and ink in the pack, while retail drop-ship channels demand transit survival validated to ASTM D4169. Both verticals ship low-bulk, fragile or liquid-bearing SKUs where a single cracked corner or delaminated flap triggers entire-lot rejection. This guide is anchored exclusively to the engineering variables that decide those outcomes: die-cut geometry, crease physics, board selection, ink chemistry, and freight-validated stack strength.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"geo-cover-box\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px 0; text-align:center;\">\n<div class=\"img-crop-box\" style=\"overflow:hidden; position:relative; display:inline-block; max-width:100%; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); border:1px solid #e2e8f0; line-height:0;\">\n    <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.pollinations.ai\/prompt\/Vibrant%2C%20sun-drenched%20photography%20studio%20with%20volumetric%20rays%20illuminating%20a%20sophisticated%20display%20of%20baby%20skincare%20and%20wooden%20toy%20packaging.%20Focus%20on%20a%20meticulously%20engineered%20round-corner%20die-cut%20box%2C%20showcasing%20its%20elegant%20curves%20and%20heavy-metal-free%20ink%20compliance.%20Shot%20with%20a%20Hasselblad%20medium%20format%20lens%2C%20f%2F2.8%20bokeh%2C%20shallow%20depth%20of%20field%2C%20golden%20hour%20rim%20lighting.%208k%2C%20photorealistic%2C%20vivid%20colors.%20NO%20text%2C%20NO%20watermark%2C%20NO%20letters.?width=1200&amp;height=675&amp;model=flux&amp;nologo=true&amp;seed=521422\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" alt=\"Round-Corner Die-Cut Engineering &amp; PPWR: Zero-Die CAD Prototyping Cost Teardown - Design Overview\" title=\"Round-Corner Die-Cut Engineering &amp; PPWR: Zero-Die CAD Prototyping Cost Teardown\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" style=\"display:block; width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:0; border:none; box-shadow:none; transform:scale(1.07); transform-origin:center 15%;\">\n  <\/div><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px; color:#64748b; margin-top:8px; font-style:italic;\">Figure: Packaging Design Overview (Round-Corner Die-Cut Engineering &amp; PPWR: Zero-Die CAD Prototyping Cost Teardown)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>1. Round-Corner Die-Cut Mechanics: Why Radius Controls Failure<\/h2>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Core Engineering Definition: Corner Radius (R) in Die-Cut Geometry\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\">Corner radius is the arc length substitution for a 90\u00b0 knife-corner in a die-cut profile, specified per ISO 187 \/ ISO 186:2020 conditioned board, where internal radius below 2.0mm on 350gsm+ CCNB or E-flute concentrates fiber fracture stress and typically initiates edge cracking above 12% moisture content.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<p>Sharp die-cut corners act as stress concentrators. In folding carton and thin corrugate, the cutting rule severs fibers along two perpendicular lines that meet at a single point; under flexure during ER-route transit, that point sees a strain concentration factor approaching 2\u20133\u00d7 nominal. Specifying a 3.0mm internal radius on E-flute (1.5mm caliper) or a 4.0mm radius on 350gsm CCNB distributes that strain across an arc, reducing fiber fracture incidence on production runs. Structural limits to respect:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>E-flute (1.5mm caliper): minimum internal corner radius 2.0\u20133.0mm; below 2.0mm requires nicking and hand-finishing, killing automation economics.<\/li>\n<li>B-flute (3.0mm caliper): minimum 5.0mm radius; crease-to-cut spacing \u2265 3.2mm to prevent flute smash at the fold line.<\/li>\n<li>350gsm CCNB folded cartons: 3.0\u20134.0mm radius with 45-durometer creasing matrix; crease channel depth must match caliper + 0.05\u20130.10mm to avoid hinge whitening.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Creasing rule physics matter as much as cutting geometry. On E-flute, a crease rule of 2pt height with a matrix channel of 0.5mm width holds fold-softness within \u00b10.15mm registration tolerance, which is the standard TadaPack production spec. Mis-registered creasing\u2014off by more than 0.3mm\u2014shifts the neutral fold axis into the print layer, causing score cracking that no ink audit will forgive on baby-adjacent SKUs.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:18px 0;padding:14px 18px;background:#eff6ff;border-radius:8px;border:1px solid #bfdbfe;\"><strong>\u3010\ud83d\udca1 Packaging Engineer&#8217;s Quick Q&amp;A\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Q: If the McKee formula derives BCT from ECT, why do overseas enterprise POs still mandate Mullen burst testing?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>A:<\/strong> First, the direct answer: Mullen burst (per TAPPI Standard T810, 2026 revision) remains contractually required because it validates the middle liner and confining medium under multi-directional hydraulic pressure, which ECT does not. Second, the mechanical reason: ECT is a uniaxial edge-load metric; burst better proxies puncture and corner-abrasion resistance on die-cut panels where round corners change the load path. Third, the procurement recommendation: accept ECT-32 (or ECT-44 for &gt;12kg wooden toy shippers) as the stacking design basis, but retain a Mullen 200 test on the liner spec sheet to satisfy big-box and EU retailer quality audits\u2014dual-spec boards avoid requalification fees.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>2. PPWR Compliance &amp; Heavy-Metal-Free Ink Audits: The 2026 Checklist<\/h2>\n<p>Per EU Directive 94\/62\/EC Annex II and the EU PPWR (2024\/1991) packaging waste reduction mandates, all packaging placed on the EU market must be designed for recyclability by defined grade thresholds, with heavy-metal limits (lead, cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium combined below 100 ppm) enforced at border audits. For baby skincare cartons and wooden toy shippers, three compliance layers stack:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Substrate:<\/strong> mono-material corrugate or CCNB with zero plastic laminates; PFAS-free barrier coatings only, since fluorinated grease barriers now fail recyclability grading.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Inks:<\/strong> heavy-metal-free (HM-free) formulations, water-based or UV-low-migration for primary-contact proximity in baby skincare outers; retain supplier Declarations of Compliance (DoC) per ink lot.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Adhesives &amp; construction:<\/strong> water-based cold-glue only; avoid tape-reinforced corners that contaminate the paper recycling stream and drop the recyclability grade under PPWR design-for-recycling criteria.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Per FTC Green Guides (16 CFR Part 260) substantiation rules, any US-market recyclability claim on the same tooling must be backed by documented access to recycling facilities; mono-material construction makes that claim defensible on both continents with one dieline\u2014a genuine cost lever dual-market brands routinely miss.<\/p>\n<h2>3. Zero-Die CAD Prototyping: The Cost Mechanism<\/h2>\n<p>Traditional sampling requires a physical die: $450\u2013$1,200 per cutting form (hypothetical industry benchmark ranges, varying by panel count), plus 5\u201310 working days per revision. Zero-die CAD prototyping replaces the steel rule with digital cutting and creasing on the production substrate, so dieline iterations carry zero tooling amortization and 24\u201348h turnaround. TadaPack&#8217;s custom structural packaging and prototyping service (https:\/\/tadapack.com) runs full dieline generation, radius optimization, and grain-direction validation in CAD before any board is cut, and its free calculation tools (https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools) let engineers verify BCT, stacking derate, and dimensional-weight freight exposure interactively.<\/p>\n<p>Hypothetical worked example: a baby skincare shipper needing 4 dieline revisions. Conventional path: 4 dies \u00d7 $800 = $3,200 tooling + 30 days. Zero-die path: $0 tooling + 6 days, with revision risk shifted to the CAD file. At a 50,000-unit annual volume, eliminating tooling plus avoiding one over-ordered safety run typically yields the 12\u201322% landed-cost reduction referenced above\u2014but verify against your own volumes using the TadaPack calculators, as results scale with SKU count and revision frequency.<\/p>\n<h2>4. Production SOP: Round-Corner Die-Cut Verification Checklist<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Step 1 \u2014 Substrate conditioning:<\/strong> Condition all board 24h at 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% \u00b1 2% RH per ISO 186:2020 \/ ISO 187 before cutting; unconditioned E-flute at &gt;65% RH will crack at radii as large as 3.0mm.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 2 \u2014 Dieline registration:<\/strong> Cut-to-crease registration held at \u00b10.15mm; verify internal corner radii against the CAD file with a radius gauge at first-article inspection on every new die or digital-cut job.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 3 \u2014 Creasing matrix setup:<\/strong> Fit 45-durometer creasing matrix, channel width = caliper + 0.3mm (e.g., 1.8mm channel for 1.5mm E-flute); check fold-back for score whitening and liner cracking at 180\u00b0.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 4 \u2014 Transit validation:<\/strong> Run ISTA 3A General Simulation Performance Testing (drop, vibration, compression sequences) on the finished die-cut shipper, then confirm compressive resistance per ASTM D642 and confirm BCT \u2265 1.5\u20132.0\u00d7 the calculated stacking load with derating (Section 5).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0fdf4;border-left:4px solid #16a34a;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\ud83d\udd2c Engineering Lab Bench Test Record (Hypothetical Worked Example Format)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\">Illustrative lab framework\u2014substitute your own measured data before publication or PO documentation. Conditioning: 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% RH (per ASTM D685 standard). Instruments: Mitutoyo 547-400S digital caliper (caliper verification), Lansmont compression tester (BCT per ASTM D642), TAPPI T810 Mullen burst tester. Statistical sample: 10-specimen average, tolerance \u00b10.15mm, reference lot format: Lot #TP-2026-B4. Record ECT, BCT, burst, Cobb 60, and caliper for every substrate lot in this format to survive third-party audits.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>5. Defect Diagnostics &amp; Multi-Regional Logistics Landing Matrix<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Defect 1 \u2014 Corner crack at the radius:<\/strong> Root cause is usually insufficient radius-to-caliper ratio or board conditioned below spec humidity. Corrective action: increase internal radius one size step (e.g., 3.0\u21924.0mm on B-flute), re-condition board 24h, and reduce cutting speed by 15% on the first pallet.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Defect 2 \u2014 Flap popping \/ adhesive debonding after ocean transit:<\/strong> Root cause is Cobb 60 water absorption above ~35 g\/m\u00b2 triggering fiber swelling and cold-glue softening during 30-day Pacific or Atlantic sailings with container sweat. Corrective action: spec liner with Cobb 60 \u2264 30 g\/m\u00b2, switch to higher-solids water-based adhesive, and add top-only poly-free wax alternatives\u2014never plastic laminates, which break PPWR grading.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:16px 0;font-size:14px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Hub \/ Corridor<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Dominant Stress Mode<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Stacking Derate Factor<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Governing Standard \/ Test Protocol<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Pacific \u2192 California Inland Empire (FBA ONT8 \/ LGB3)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">30-day ocean humidity, container sweat, double-stack clamp handling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u00d70.60 (coastal humidity) \u2192 verify at destination<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISTA 3A \/ ASTM D4169<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Texas DFW distribution triangle<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Intermodal rail shock, dry inland RH cycling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u00d70.75 (dry inland, higher allowable)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ASTM D642 \/ ASTM D4169<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Port of Rotterdam \u2192 EU multimodal rail\/road<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Atlantic moisture, high stack palletization, PPWR grade audit at border<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u00d70.60\u20130.65 (coastal + EU stack norms)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 2247 \/ EU PPWR (2024\/1991)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Board qualification (all lanes)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Liner burst &amp; flute integrity<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u2014<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">TAPPI T810 (2026 revision)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Engineering takeaway: design to the derated load, not the lab BCT. An ECT-44 BC-flute wooden toy shipper with a 4,000N lab BCT supports only ~2,400N after a \u00d70.60 coastal derate\u2014under-dimensioning here is the most common cause of warehouse collapse claims. Per Amazon FBA dimensional-weight rules, also model carton outer dimensions early: a 10mm caliper reduction on the shipper can drop an entire DIM tier at ONT8-scale volumes. Verify your specific SKU geometry at https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools before locking the dieline.<\/p>\n<h2>6. Procurement Decision Matrix<\/h2>\n<p>Specify round-corner die-cut, PPWR-compliant, zero-die-prototyped packaging when: (1) SKU revision frequency exceeds 2\/year; (2) you ship into both US and EU retail with dual recyclability-claim exposure; (3) product value or liability (baby-contact categories) justifies ISTA 3A validation per dieline. Specify conventional dies only when volumes exceed roughly 500,000 units on a frozen dieline, where per-unit die amortization falls below the digital-cutting rate. For everything between, request a dual-quote: TadaPack&#8217;s prototyping desk (https:\/\/tadapack.com) will model both scenarios with your actual revision history and return a tooling-vs-digital breakeven volume you can defend in a sourcing committee.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<section class=\"topic-cluster-links\" style=\"margin-top:28px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><h3 style=\"margin-top:0;font-size:17px;color:#1e293b;\">Recommended Engineering Reading<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;padding-left:20px;color:#3b82f6;line-height:1.7;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/custom-cad-prototyping-soy-ink-safety-validation-fba-ready-retail-packaging\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Custom CAD Prototyping &#038; Soy-Ink Safety Validation: FBA-Ready Retail Packaging<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/ppwr-zero-plastic-molded-fiber-inserts-vs-eps-foam-for-iot\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">PPWR Zero-Plastic: Molded Fiber Inserts vs EPS Foam for IoT<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/section>\n<section class=\"tools-recom-box\" style=\"margin-top:24px;padding:20px;background:#f8fafc;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:8px;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;\"><div style=\"display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;margin-bottom:14px;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:8px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;\"><span style=\"color:#2563eb;font-weight:700;\">[TOOLS]<\/span> Featured Engineering &#038; Calculation Tools<\/h3>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#2563eb;text-decoration:none;font-weight:500;\">Explore 70+ Packaging Tools \u2794<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"tools-grid\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));gap:14px;margin-top:10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/box-compression-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">BCT &#038; Stacking<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Box Compression (BCT) Calculator<\/h4>\nPredict box compressive limit and stacking safety factors via McKee formula.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/edge-crush-test-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">ECT Testing<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Edge Crush Test (ECT) Calculator<\/h4>\nCalculate linerboard ring crush and composite ECT ratings for optimal board specs.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div><\/section>\n<p><!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<!-- Google & AI GEO Schema.org Structured Data --><br \/>\n<!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Engineering-grade guide: round-corner die-cut design, PPWR 2024\/1991 compliance, heavy-metal-free inks, and zero-die CAD prototyping to cut baby skincare &#038; wooden toy packaging costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-compliance-and-marketing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3412","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3412"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3412\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}