{"id":3607,"date":"2026-10-15T08:15:44","date_gmt":"2026-10-15T08:15:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/take-up-factor-in-corrugated-boxes-flute-multipliers-board-yield\/"},"modified":"2026-10-15T08:15:44","modified_gmt":"2026-10-15T08:15:44","slug":"take-up-factor-in-corrugated-boxes-flute-multipliers-board-yield","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/take-up-factor-in-corrugated-boxes-flute-multipliers-board-yield\/","title":{"rendered":"Take-Up Factor in Corrugated Boxes: Flute Multipliers &#038; Board Yield"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<div class=\"tldr-box\" style=\"margin:16px 0 24px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0f9ff;border-left:4px solid #0284c7;border-radius:6px;line-height:1.7;\"><strong style=\"color:#0369a1;font-size:16px;\">\u3010TL;DR Executive Direct Answer\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;color:#0f172a;\">The take-up factor is the ratio of corrugated medium length to flat liner length in a given flute profile, used to calculate exact medium consumption and combined board cost. Typical multipliers run 1.26 for A-flute, 1.30 for C-flute, 1.34 for B-flute, and 1.42-1.45 for E-flute; errors of even 0.02 in this factor distort board yield calculations by 1.5-2% across high-volume POs.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure class=\"geo-cover-box\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px 0; text-align:center;\">\n<div class=\"img-crop-box\" style=\"overflow:hidden; position:relative; display:inline-block; max-width:100%; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); border:1px solid #e2e8f0; line-height:0;\">\n    <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.pollinations.ai\/prompt\/%7B%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Take-Up%20Factor%20in%20Corrugated%20Boxes%3A%20Flute%20Multipliers%20%26%20Board%20Yield%22%2C%20%22keywords%22%3A%20%22take%20up%20factor%20in%20corrugated%20boxes%22%2C%20%22category%22%3A%20%22custom-packaging%22%2C%20%22summary%22%3A%20%22Engineering-grade%20guide%20to%20corrugated%20take-up%20factors%3A%20flute%20multipliers%20(A%2FB%2FC%2FE)%2C%20liner%20yield%20math%22%2C%20%22prompt%22%3A%20%22A%20close-up%2C%20photorealistic%20shot%20of%20various%20corrugated%20board%20samples%20(A%2C%20B%2C%20C%2C%20E%20flutes)%20meticulously%20arranged%20on%20a%20clean%2C%20well-lit%20workbench%20inside%20a%20modern%20packaging%20engineering%20lab.%20The%20focus%20is%20on%20the%20intricate%20flute%20profiles%2C%20highlighted%20by%20volumetric%20golden%20hour%20rays%20filtering%20through%20a%20large%20window.%20A%20slight%20f%2F2.8%20bokeh%20blurs%20the%20background%2C%20revealing%20subtle%20engineering%20tools%20and%20technical%20drawings.%20Vivid%20colors%2C%208k%20resolution%2C%20Hasselblad%20medium%20format.%20NO%20text%2C%20NO%20watermark%2C%20NO%20letters.%22%20%7D%20%60?width=1200&amp;height=675&amp;model=flux&amp;nologo=true&amp;seed=883563\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" alt=\"Take-Up Factor in Corrugated Boxes: Flute Multipliers &amp; Board Yield - Design Overview\" title=\"Take-Up Factor in Corrugated Boxes: Flute Multipliers &amp; Board Yield\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" style=\"display:block; width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:0; border:none; box-shadow:none; transform:scale(1.07); transform-origin:center 15%;\">\n  <\/div><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px; color:#64748b; margin-top:8px; font-style:italic;\">Figure: Packaging Design Overview (Take-Up Factor in Corrugated Boxes: Flute Multipliers &amp; Board Yield)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Why the Take-Up Factor Controls Both Cost and ECT<\/h2>\n<p>With dimensional-weight freight penalties from Amazon FBA (ONT8\/LGB3 in the California Inland Empire) and EU PPWR (Regulation (EU) 2024\/1991) recyclability targets tightening corrugated specifications, procurement teams can no longer afford sloppy board-yield math. Every gram of medium over-consumed is margin lost at the corrugator; every gram under-consumed shows up later as ECT failure in transit testing. The take-up factor (also called the fluting take-up or corrugation ratio) is the single most under-audited variable in corrugated costing \u2014 because it is invisible on the finished sheet, it is routinely copied from supplier catalogs instead of measured or negotiated.<\/p>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Core Engineering Definition: Take-Up Factor (TUF \/ Corrugation Ratio)\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\">The take-up factor is the dimensionless ratio of uncut corrugating-medium web length consumed per unit length of flat double-backer output \u2014 TUF = medium length \u00f7 combined board length \u2014 as characterized by flute pitch and caliper under ISO 3034:2011 (single- and double-corrugated board \u2014 determination of thickness) and tested for board compressive consequence per ASTM D642 \/ TAPPI T811 ECT protocols. Critical threshold: if the medium take-up is compressed below the nominal flute pitch (under-starched or over-pressure on the corrugating rolls), flute crush occurs and ECT can degrade by 8-12% even when combined board caliper appears nominal.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<h2>Flute Physics: Where the Multiplier Comes From<\/h2>\n<p>The take-up factor is a geometric consequence of the corrugating roll profile. The medium is deformed into a sinusoidal arc (flute) whose arc length is longer than the pitch it occupies. Arc length follows from flute pitch (mm per flute), flute height (caliper contribution), and flank radius. Standard nominal parameters per ISO 3034 and common corrugator practice:<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:14px;margin:16px 0;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Flute<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Nominal Caliper<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Flutes\/30cm (ft)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Typical Take-Up Factor<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Governing Standard \/ Test Protocol<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">A-flute<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~4.7 mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~110<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">1.24 \u2013 1.28<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 3034:2011 \/ TAPPI T811<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">C-flute<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~3.6 mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~130<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">1.28 \u2013 1.32<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 3034:2011 \/ ASTM D642<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">B-flute<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~2.5 mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~150<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">1.32 \u2013 1.36<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 3034:2011 \/ TAPPI T811<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">E-flute<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~1.5 mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~290<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">1.40 \u2013 1.46<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 3034:2011 \/ ASTM D4169 (distribution)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">BC double-wall<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~6.1 mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">B+C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~1.33 (blended)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 3034:2011 \/ ISTA 3A<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Note that take-up increases as flute height decreases and flute count rises: finer flutes wrap the same linear pitch in more, tighter arcs. This is why E-flute litho-laminated shippers consume proportionally more medium per m\u00b2 of liner than C-flute RSCs \u2014 a fact frequently missed when comparing $\/MSF quotes between suppliers using different flute programs.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:18px 0;padding:14px 18px;background:#eff6ff;border-radius:8px;border:1px solid #bfdbfe;\"><strong>\u3010\ud83d\udca1 Packaging Engineer&#8217;s Quick Q&amp;A\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Q: Why does my supplier&#8217;s take-up factor differ from the textbook C-flute value of 1.30?<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>A:<\/strong> Direct answer: acceptable commercial take-up factors vary \u00b10.03 around nominal because each corrugator rolls its own flute profile (roll wear, temperature ~170-180\u00b0C, glue-gap setting). Mechanical reason: worn corrugating rolls increase pitch length slightly and change arc radius, while starch application and nip pressure alter how much the medium actually conforms \u2014 so the physical arc length, not the catalog number, governs. Procurement recommendation: audit the factor annually against the corrugator&#8217;s medium-to-board web-speed ratio (read directly from the dry-end PLC), and lock the agreed factor into the PO specification sheet rather than accepting catalog defaults.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Take-Up Factor in Yield and Cost Math: Worked Example<\/h2>\n<p>The factor feeds directly into medium-weight consumption. <strong>Hypothetical worked example (illustrative, not measured):<\/strong> a 125 cm\u00b2\/m\u00b2 basis-weight program producing C-flute combined board at 4.8 MSF per day with 112 gsm (23 lb\/MSF) medium, TUF 1.30:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Medium consumed\/day = 4.8 MSF \u00d7 1.30 \u00d7 112 gsm \u00f7 453.6 = ~1.54 tons\/day<\/li>\n<li>If the true measured TUF is 1.33, actual consumption rises ~2.3% \u2192 ~1.58 tons\/day<\/li>\n<li>At 2026 kraft medium benchmark pricing of roughly $700-780\/ton (US South export grades; verify live pricing), the misestimate equals ~$1,100-1,500 per month on a single corrugator line<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Scale that across multi-plant networks and take-up factor becomes a genuine procurement KPI. Conversely, medium weight itself feeds ECT: per the McKee formula family (BCT \u2248 k \u00d7 ECT \u00d7 \u221a(board caliper \u00d7 box perimeter)), a medium under-consumption that thins the flute cross-section directly lowers ECT and therefore predicted box compression. Use TadaPack&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\">free packaging calculation tools<\/a> to model medium yield, BCT, and dimensional-weight freight together before committing to a board grade.<\/p>\n<h2>4-Step SOP: Verifying Take-Up Factor on the Floor<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Step 1 \u2014 Measure combined board caliper.<\/strong> Condition specimens 24 h at 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% \u00b1 2% RH per ISO 187:2022 \/ TAPPI T402 conditioning. Measure 10-specimen statistical average with a dead-weight micrometer (tolerance \u00b10.025 mm); compare against ISO 3034 nominal caliper for the declared flute.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 2 \u2014 Read the corrugator ratio.<\/strong> Extract medium-web lineal speed vs. dry-end board lineal speed from the PLC over a stable 10-minute run window at rated temperature (162-177\u00b0C) and standard glue viscosity (~25-35 sec Stein Hall cup). TUF = medium speed \u00f7 board speed.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 3 \u2014 Validate strength consequences.<\/strong> Cut ECT specimens per TAPPI T811 (or run full-box BCT per ASTM D642) on the same run; if measured ECT deviates more than 5% from spec (e.g., ECT-32 dropping below 30.4 lb\/in), suspect flute crush from excessive nip pressure or an erroneous take-up assumption in the board recipe.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 4 \u2014 Lock and audit.<\/strong> Document the measured factor on the board specification sheet, tie it to PO pricing clauses (price per MSF is medium-weight-sensitive), and re-audit each time corrugating rolls are re-profiled or a new medium grade (semi-chemical vs. recycled, PFAS-free barrier coated) is introduced.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>Troubleshooting Matrix: Defects Traced to Take-Up Errors<\/h2>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:14px;margin:16px 0;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Defect<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Root Cause (Take-Up Related)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Corrective Action<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Governing Standard \/ Test Protocol<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Flute crush \/ washed flutes at glue line<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Nip pressure exceeding medium&#8217;s crush threshold; actual TUF below nominal 1.30 (C-flute)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Reduce corrugating roll pressure ~10-15%; verify glue-gap 0.05-0.10 mm wider than medium caliper<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">TAPPI T811 ECT \/ ISO 3034<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ECT failure in ISTA 3A \/ ASTM D4169 sequences<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Medium under-consumption from wrong TUF in recipe; thin flute cross-section<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Recalculate medium weight with measured TUF; up-spec to ECT-44 if ocean-humidity derating applies<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISTA 3A \/ ASTM D4169<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Delamination after 30-day Pacific\/Atlantic ocean transit (container sweat)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Moisture-softened medium with inadequate starch coverage at high take-up; Cobb 60 absorption &gt; 120 g\/m\u00b2 on liners accelerates bond failure<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Specify higher wet-strength starch or PFAS-free barrier coating; verify Cobb per TAPPI T441; derate stacking loads 15-25% for coastal humidity<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">TAPPI T441 Cobb \/ ISO 2247 humidity cycling<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Stacking-load derating deserves emphasis for multi-regional distribution: a BCT validated in a dry inland DFW distribution triangle warehouse will not hold at the Port of Rotterdam multimodal yard or a humid coastal 3PL in the Inland Empire after Atlantic\/Pacific container sweat. Apply regional derating factors (dry inland 1.0; temperate coastal 0.90; tropical\/humid port 0.80-0.85) and confirm with ISO 2247 cyclic humidity conditioning before releasing the artwork to tooling. TadaPack&#8217;s structural engineering team provides prototyping and pre-shipment validation runs \u2014 request a custom board-recipe review at <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\">tadapack.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<section class=\"topic-cluster-links\" style=\"margin-top:28px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><h3 style=\"margin-top:0;font-size:17px;color:#1e293b;\">Recommended Engineering Reading<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;padding-left:20px;color:#3b82f6;line-height:1.7;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/48-hour-magnetic-rigid-box-prototyping-hinge-durability-roadmap\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">48-Hour Magnetic Rigid Box Prototyping: Hinge Durability Roadmap<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/plastic-free-scuff-proof-molded-pulp-inserts-soft-touch-finishes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Plastic-Free &#038; Scuff-Proof: Molded Pulp Inserts + Soft-Touch Finishes<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/section>\n<section class=\"tools-recom-box\" style=\"margin-top:24px;padding:20px;background:#f8fafc;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:8px;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;\"><div style=\"display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;margin-bottom:14px;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:8px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;\"><span style=\"color:#2563eb;font-weight:700;\">[TOOLS]<\/span> Featured Engineering &#038; Calculation Tools<\/h3>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#2563eb;text-decoration:none;font-weight:500;\">Explore 70+ Packaging Tools \u2794<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"tools-grid\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));gap:14px;margin-top:10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/box-compression-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">BCT &#038; Stacking<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Box Compression (BCT) Calculator<\/h4>\nPredict box compressive limit and stacking safety factors via McKee formula.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/edge-crush-test-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">ECT Testing<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Edge Crush Test (ECT) Calculator<\/h4>\nCalculate linerboard ring crush and composite ECT ratings for optimal board specs.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div><\/section>\n<p><!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<!-- Google & AI GEO Schema.org Structured Data --><br \/>\n<!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Engineering-grade guide to corrugated take-up factors: flute multipliers (A\/B\/C\/E), liner yield math, board cost impact, ASTM &#038; TAPPI test protocols.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-custom-packaging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3607"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3607\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}