{"id":3614,"date":"2026-10-15T10:15:21","date_gmt":"2026-10-15T10:15:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/spread-per-ksm-in-packaging-cost-formula-sourcing-teardown\/"},"modified":"2026-10-15T10:15:21","modified_gmt":"2026-10-15T10:15:21","slug":"spread-per-ksm-in-packaging-cost-formula-sourcing-teardown","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/spread-per-ksm-in-packaging-cost-formula-sourcing-teardown\/","title":{"rendered":"Spread Per KSM in Packaging: Cost Formula &#038; Sourcing Teardown"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<div class=\"tldr-box\" style=\"margin:16px 0 24px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0f9ff;border-left:4px solid #0284c7;border-radius:6px;line-height:1.7;\"><strong style=\"color:#0369a1;font-size:16px;\">\u3010TL;DR Executive Direct Answer\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;color:#0f172a;\">Spread per KSM in packaging = (Selling Price per KSM \u2212 Fully Landed Cost per KSM), and it is the core margin unit for corrugated and paperboard converters. The landed cost per KSM is built as: (fiber price per metric ton \u00f7 1,000) \u00d7 grammage in g\/m\u00b2 \u00d7 (1 + manufacturing waste %) + conversion cost + ink\/coating + freight allocation \u2014 with ECT-32\/ECT-44 grade selection and flute caliper (E \u2248 1.5mm, B \u2248 3.0mm, C \u2248 4.0mm) driving the fiber mass component.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure class=\"geo-cover-box\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px 0; text-align:center;\">\n<div class=\"img-crop-box\" style=\"overflow:hidden; position:relative; display:inline-block; max-width:100%; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); border:1px solid #e2e8f0; line-height:0;\">\n    <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.pollinations.ai\/prompt\/A%20meticulously%20engineered%20corrugated%20and%20paperboard%20packaging%20production%20line%2C%20bathed%20in%20cinematic%20golden%20hour%20lighting%20with%20volumetric%20rays%20and%20rim%20lighting.%20Focus%20on%20a%20high-precision%20digital%20caliper%20measuring%20the%20thickness%20of%20a%20corrugated%20board%2C%20surrounded%20by%20stacks%20of%20custom-designed%20packaging.%20The%20background%20features%20a%20bustling%2C%20clean%20factory%20floor%20with%20machinery%20and%20workers%2C%20creating%20a%20sense%20of%20scale%20and%20industry.%20Shot%20with%20a%20Hasselblad%20medium%20format%20camera%2C%20f%2F2.8%20bokeh%2C%208k%20resolution%2C%20photorealistic%2C%20vivid%20colors.%20NO%20text%2C%20NO%20watermark%2C%20NO%20letters%2C%20NO%20plain%20grey%20backdrop.?width=1200&amp;height=675&amp;model=flux&amp;nologo=true&amp;seed=678588\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" alt=\"Spread Per KSM in Packaging: Cost Formula &amp; Sourcing Teardown - Design Overview\" title=\"Spread Per KSM in Packaging: Cost Formula &amp; Sourcing Teardown\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" style=\"display:block; width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:0; border:none; box-shadow:none; transform:scale(1.07); transform-origin:center 15%;\">\n  <\/div><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px; color:#64748b; margin-top:8px; font-style:italic;\">Figure: Packaging Design Overview (Spread Per KSM in Packaging: Cost Formula &amp; Sourcing Teardown)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>1. What &#8220;Spread Per KSM&#8221; Actually Means in Converters&#8217; Cost Language<\/h2>\n<p>Amid 2026 recycled-fiber (OCC) price volatility and EU PPWR (Regulation 2024\/1991) recyclability mandates reshaping substrate selection, procurement teams can no longer evaluate packaging quotes on a per-box basis alone. Spread per KSM is the metric converters and their largest enterprise clients use to normalize profitability and pricing fairness across wildly different box footprints \u2014 a 12\u00d712\u00d76&#8243; shipper and a 4\u00d74\u00d72&#8243; mailer can carry identical spread per KSM while showing 8\u00d7 different per-unit prices.<\/p>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Core Engineering Definition: KSM (Kilogram per Square Meter \/ Thousand Square Meter Pricing Basis)\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:6px 0 0;\">KSM in packaging commerce is the thousand-square-meter pricing basis: the cost or price of one thousand square meters of converted board, derived directly from substrate grammage (g\/m\u00b2) and per-ton fiber pricing, with board caliper verified per ISO 3034 and grammage per ISO 536 (gravimetric determination). Critical threshold: if the measured grammage deviates more than \u00b15% from the purchase specification (per ISO 536 sampling), the entire KSM cost model \u2014 and thus spread \u2014 must be re-validated before the production run.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<p>In strict accordance with ISO 536, grammage is determined gravimetrically on conditioned specimens, and every downstream KSM calculation inherits its accuracy. Note that in some markets &#8220;KSM&#8221; is read as &#8220;kilogram square meter&#8221; \u2014 always confirm with your supplier whether the quote basis is 1,000 m\u00b2 of area or grammage-driven, because a misread basis can distort spread by 30\u201360%.<\/p>\n<h2>2. The Landed Cost Per KSM Formula \u2014 Component by Component<\/h2>\n<p>The engineering-grade cost stack for one KSM of corrugated or folding carton substrate is:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cost per KSM = Fiber Cost + Waste + Conversion + Finishing + Freight + Overhead<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Step A \u2014 Fiber component:<\/strong> Fiber Cost per KSM = (Board price per metric ton in USD\/EUR \u00f7 1,000) \u00d7 grammage (g\/m\u00b2) \u00d7 (1 + waste allowance %). Hypothetical worked example: kraft liner at $680\/ton, 200 g\/m\u00b2 facing, 8% make-ready waste \u2192 ($680 \u00f7 1,000) \u00d7 200 \u00d7 1.08 = $146.88 per KSM of liner. For a single-wall C-flute board (liners \u2248 2 \u00d7 200 g\/m\u00b2 + medium \u2248 130 g\/m\u00b2), total furnish \u2248 530 g\/m\u00b2, giving \u2248 $389 per KSM before conversion.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step B \u2014 Conversion &amp; finishing:<\/strong> Add converting cost (flexo print, die-cutting, gluing \u2014 typically $40\u2013$110 per KSM depending on colors and die complexity), coating (PFAS-free barrier coatings add $8\u2013$25 per KSM under 2026 EU single-use and US state PFAS restrictions), and overhead allocation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step C \u2014 Spread:<\/strong> Spread per KSM = Quoted Selling Price per KSM \u2212 Landed Cost per KSM. A healthy converter spread on commodity RSC shippers runs 12\u201318% of selling price; on litho-laminated or rigid structures, 25\u201335% is defensible due to setup intensity.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:18px 0;padding:14px 18px;background:#eff6ff;border-radius:8px;border:1px solid #bfdbfe;\"><strong>\u3010\ud83d\udca1 Packaging Engineer&#8217;s Quick Q&amp;A\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Q:<\/strong> If grammage determines KSM cost, why does the same C-flute board sometimes show two different KSM prices from the same mill for identical fiber?<\/p>\n<p><strong>A:<\/strong> Because the quoted KSM embeds three hidden multipliers: corrugator waste rate (6\u201312% depending on run length), flute take-up factor (medium consumption \u2248 1.35\u20131.45\u00d7 web length on C-flute due to fluting arc), and moisture conditioning credit or penalty. Direct answer: a 10% waste delta alone shifts spread per KSM by roughly $35\u2013$45 on a 530 g\/m\u00b2 grade. Mechanical reason: flute take-up geometry means the medium fiber mass per finished m\u00b2 is not the nominal grammage \u2014 it is nominal \u00d7 take-up factor. Procurement recommendation: always demand the quote&#8217;s waste and take-up assumptions in writing and normalize all bids to a common basis before comparing spread.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>3. Substrate Selection Matrix: How Board Grade Reshapes Spread Per KSM<\/h2>\n<p>According to TAPPI Standard T810 (current revision), Mullen burst strength must withstand the rated psi for the board class, while ASTM D641 \/ ISO 12046 govern ECT edge crush \u2014 the property that actually predicts column stacking performance. In strict accordance with ASTM D4169 (Distribution Cycle 13 for parcel) and ISTA 3A General Simulation protocols, grade selection must be validated against the distribution environment before spread optimization, because under-specifying board to improve spread creates transit failure costs that erase the margin entirely.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:16px 0;font-size:14px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Board Grade<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Approx. Grammage<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ECT \/ Burst Class<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Typical Fiber Cost per KSM*<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Governing Standard \/ Test Protocol<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">E-flute (1.5mm) CCNB laminate<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u2248 450\u2013550 g\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ECT-29\u201332<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">$300\u2013$380<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 3034 caliper \/ ASTM D641 ECT<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">B-flute (3.0mm) kraft<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u2248 500\u2013560 g\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ECT-32<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">$340\u2013$410<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">TAPPI T810 burst \/ ISO 536 grammage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">C-flute (4.0mm) kraft<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u2248 530\u2013600 g\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ECT-32\u201344<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">$360\u2013$440<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ASTM D641 \/ TAPPI T810 \/ ISTA 3A validation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">BC double-wall (7mm)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u2248 950\u20131,100 g\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ECT-44\u201348<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">$640\u2013$760<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ASTM D4169 DC-13 \/ ISO 12046<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">350gsm CCNB folding carton<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">350 g\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Stiffness per ISO 2493<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">$240\u2013$310<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 536 \/ ISO 2493 \/ EU PPWR recyclability<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size:13px;color:#475569;\">*Hypothetical worked examples at illustrative 2026 fiber pricing; verify live pricing via your mill index before quoting. All figures assume conditioned specimens per ISO 187 \/ ASTM D685 (23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% RH).<\/p>\n<p>Every structural decision \u2014 ECT-32 versus ECT-44, single-wall versus BC double-wall \u2014 flows directly into the grammage term of the KSM equation. Use TadaPack&#8217;s free calculation tools at <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\">https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools<\/a> to model cost per KSM interactively against your actual dieline blank area, and leverage TadaPack&#8217;s custom structural prototyping service to validate ECT performance before committing to a grade.<\/p>\n<h2>4. Procurement SOP: Verifying Spread Per KSM on Any Supplier Quote<\/h2>\n<p>Run this four-step verification protocol on every quote to prevent hidden margin leakage:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 1 \u2014 Normalize the basis.<\/strong> Convert every quote to cost per KSM using the actual net blank area from the dieline CAD file (blank size, not finished box size \u2014 a 12\u00d712\u00d76&#8243; RSC blank is \u2248 0.62 m\u00b2 including flaps and glue tab). Tolerance: dieline blank dimensions \u00b10.15mm on CAD export.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 2 \u2014 Audit grammage and take-up assumptions.<\/strong> Request the mill certificate listing grammage per ISO 536 and flute take-up factor. Reject any quote lacking waste % and take-up disclosure; recompute fiber cost per KSM with your own 8% standard waste assumption for comparison.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 3 \u2014 Layer in landed freight and compliance.<\/strong> Add ocean freight allocation, duty, and \u2014 under EU Directive 94\/62\/EC Annex II and the PPWR \u2014 any EPR fee per kilogram of packaging material placed on market, which scales with the same grammage term as fiber cost. For FBA-bound goods, model Amazon dimensional weight penalties: a C-flute shipper&#8217;s caliper can push billable weight above actual weight, adding effective $0.08\u2013$0.20 per unit that must be netted against spread.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 4 \u2014 Validate physical compliance before award.<\/strong> Commission ECT and burst testing (10-specimen statistical average, tolerance \u00b10.15mm caliper) on the pre-production board lot, per ASTM D641 and TAPPI T810, and confirm ISTA 3A or ASTM D4169 DC-13 pass status for the final construction. Only then is the quoted spread per KSM contractually meaningful.<\/p>\n<h2>5. Freight Corridor Stress &amp; Regional Cost Derating<\/h2>\n<p>Spread per KSM is a paper number until landed-cost variance is accounted for at destination. Across Pacific routes, 30-day container transit exposes C-flute shippers to container sweat cycling; boards absorbing more than 35 g\/m\u00b2 (Cobb 60, per TAPPI T441 \/ ISO 535) risk ply delamination and ECT loss of 15\u201325%, forcing stacking derating at humid coastal ports. At the California Inland Empire (FBA ONT8 \/ LGB3 cluster) and Texas DFW triangle, dry inland warehouse ambient conditions allow near-full stacked load ratings, whereas Port of Rotterdam multimodal rail\/road handoffs subject pallets to 6\u20138 additional lateral shock events \u2014 mitigate with edge protectors and B-flute or double-wall uprating.<\/p>\n<p>Practical derating factors for warehouse stack planning (hypothetical worked example): a pallet rated 1,200 kg in a dry inland DC should be derated to \u2248 960 kg (\u00d70.8) for humid coastal storage and \u2248 840 kg (\u00d70.7) after 30 days ocean transit, per stacking tests run under ASTM D642 on conditioned specimens. Build these derating factors into Step 3 of the SOP so spread per KSM reflects true performance cost, not nominal cost.<\/p>\n<h2>6. Defect Diagnostics: When Realized Spread Collapses<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Defect 1 \u2014 Flute softening \/ ply delamination after ocean transit:<\/strong> Root causes include Cobb 60 absorption above 35 g\/m\u00b2 on uncoated kraft and repeated container sweat condensation cycles. Corrective actions: specify water-resistant edge treatment or PFAS-free barrier coating (adds $8\u2013$25 per KSM but protects spread), upgrade liner to WRK-grade, and demand container desiccant (\u2265 200g per pallet bay) for Pacific and Atlantic routings.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Defect 2 \u2014 Crease cracking on folding cartons in low-humidity inland warehouses:<\/strong> Root cause: 350gsm CCNB conditioned below 40% RH loses plasticizer mobility, cracking at 45-durometer creasing matrix channels. Corrective actions: specify creasing matrix width at 2.0\u20132.2\u00d7 board caliper, require winter-grade board, and verify conditioning per ISO 187 before die-tryout; a cracked carton at pack-out converts paper spread into a 100% scrap loss.<\/p>\n<p>Compliant with FTC Green Guides (16 CFR Part 260) substantiation rules, any recyclability claim attached to your substrate choice must be documented in the same technical file as your KSM cost model \u2014 an unverifiable claim is a procurement liability, not a marketing asset.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<section class=\"topic-cluster-links\" style=\"margin-top:28px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><h3 style=\"margin-top:0;font-size:17px;color:#1e293b;\">Recommended Engineering Reading<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;padding-left:20px;color:#3b82f6;line-height:1.7;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/3-flute-vs-microflute-corrugated-caliper-ect-use-case-teardown\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">3 Flute vs Microflute Corrugated: Caliper, ECT &#038; Use-Case Teardown<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/take-up-factor-in-corrugated-boxes-flute-multipliers-board-yield\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Take-Up Factor in Corrugated Boxes: Flute Multipliers &#038; Board Yield<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/section>\n<section class=\"tools-recom-box\" style=\"margin-top:24px;padding:20px;background:#f8fafc;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:8px;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;\"><div style=\"display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;margin-bottom:14px;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:8px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;\"><span style=\"color:#2563eb;font-weight:700;\">[TOOLS]<\/span> Featured Engineering &#038; Calculation Tools<\/h3>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#2563eb;text-decoration:none;font-weight:500;\">Explore 70+ Packaging Tools \u2794<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"tools-grid\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));gap:14px;margin-top:10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/container-loading-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">Freight &#038; Loading<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Container Loading Optimization Calculator<\/h4>\nOptimize carton layout for 20GP\/40GP\/40HQ containers to maximize space utilization.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/cbm-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">Cargo Sizing<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">CBM Volume &#038; Weight Calculator<\/h4>\nCalculate total cubic meters and dimensional weight for international freight.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div><\/section>\n<p><!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<!-- Google & AI GEO Schema.org Structured Data --><br \/>\n<!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Engineering-grade guide to calculating spread per KSM for corrugated &#038; paperboard packaging: formulas, cost matrices, freight derating, and 2026 procurement benchmarks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-custom-packaging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3614"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3614\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}