{"id":3757,"date":"2026-10-17T12:16:26","date_gmt":"2026-10-17T12:16:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/ect-32-vs-ect-44-corrugated-tappi-t810-stacking-strength-formula\/"},"modified":"2026-10-17T12:16:26","modified_gmt":"2026-10-17T12:16:26","slug":"ect-32-vs-ect-44-corrugated-tappi-t810-stacking-strength-formula","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/ect-32-vs-ect-44-corrugated-tappi-t810-stacking-strength-formula\/","title":{"rendered":"ECT-32 vs ECT-44 Corrugated: TAPPI T810 Stacking Strength Formula"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<div class=\"tldr-box\" style=\"margin:16px 0 24px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0f9ff;border-left:4px solid #0284c7;border-radius:6px;line-height:1.7;\"><strong style=\"color:#0369a1;font-size:16px;\">\u3010TL;DR Executive Direct Answer\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;color:#0f172a;\">ECT-44 corrugated delivers ~37% higher edge crush resistance than ECT-32, translating via the McKee formula (BCT = 5.87 \u00d7 ECT \u00d7 \u221a(d \u00d7 Z)) to roughly 25\u201335% greater stacking strength depending on box perimeter and caliper. For warehouse stacks above 5 pallet layers or 30-day humid ocean transit, ECT-44 (typically 48 ECA \/ BC-flute) is the engineering-correct specification.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<figure class=\"geo-cover-box\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px 0; text-align:center;\">\n<div class=\"img-crop-box\" style=\"overflow:hidden; position:relative; display:inline-block; max-width:100%; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); border:1px solid #e2e8f0; line-height:0;\">\n    <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.pollinations.ai\/prompt\/A%20towering%20stack%20of%20ECT-44%20corrugated%20shipping%20boxes%2C%20precisely%20engineered%2C%20contrasted%20with%20a%20smaller%20stack%20of%20ECT-32%20boxes%2C%20dramatically%20lit%20by%20volumetric%20golden%20hour%20rays%20filtering%20into%20a%20modern%2C%20high-ceilinged%20warehouse.%20Depth%20of%20field%20f%2F2.8%20bokeh%2C%20rim%20lighting%2C%20photorealistic%208k%2C%20Hasselblad%20medium%20format%2C%20vivid%20colors.%20NO%20text%2C%20NO%20watermark%2C%20NO%20letters%2C%20NO%20plain%20grey%20backdrop.?width=1200&amp;height=675&amp;model=flux&amp;nologo=true&amp;seed=222049\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" alt=\"ECT-32 vs ECT-44 Corrugated: TAPPI T810 Stacking Strength Formula - Design Overview\" title=\"ECT-32 vs ECT-44 Corrugated: TAPPI T810 Stacking Strength Formula\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" style=\"display:block; width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:0; border:none; box-shadow:none; transform:scale(1.07); transform-origin:center 15%;\">\n  <\/div><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px; color:#64748b; margin-top:8px; font-style:italic;\">Figure: Packaging Design Overview (ECT-32 vs ECT-44 Corrugated: TAPPI T810 Stacking Strength Formula)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Why ECT Grade Selection Decides Your Freight Economics<\/h2>\n<p>E-commerce unit volumes and Amazon FBA dimensional-weight penalties have pushed procurement teams to scrutinize board grades harder than ever in 2026 \u2014 but the deciding variable is not marketing grade names, it is measured Edge Crush Test (ECT) value and its downstream effect on Box Compression Test (BCT) stacking capacity. Selecting ECT-32 where ECT-44 is required produces pallet collapse claims; overspecifying ECT-44 where ECT-32 suffices wastes 8\u201315% on board weight per thousand units. This teardown anchors every recommendation to TAPPI Standard T 811 \/ T 810 edge crush methodology, ASTM D642 compression testing, and ASTM D4169 distribution cycle simulation.<\/p>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Core Engineering Definition: Edge Crush Test (ECT)\u3011<\/strong><br \/>ECT is the maximum axial compressive force per unit width (kN\/m or lb\/in) that a 25.4 mm \u00d7 101.6 mm corrugated edge column withstands before buckling, per TAPPI T 811 or ISO 3037. Per TAPPI Standard T810 (2026 Revision), conditioning requires ISO 186:2020 paper conditioning (23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% \u00b1 2% RH); an ECT loss exceeding 30% at elevated humidity signals liner delamination risk, analogous to Cobb 60 water absorption exceeding 35 g\/m\u00b2 triggering transit delamination.<\/aside>\n<h2>The TAPPI T810 \/ McKee Engineering Formula: From ECT to Safe Stack Load<\/h2>\n<p>The industry-standard derivation of stacking strength from ECT is the McKee formula: <strong>BCT = 5.87 \u00d7 ECT \u00d7 \u221a(h \u00d7 Z)<\/strong>, where BCT is box compression strength (N or lbf), ECT is edge crush (N\/m or lb\/in), h is board caliper (mm\/in), and Z is box perimeter (mm\/in). The simplified full formula BCT = 5.87 \u00d7 ECT \u00d7 t<sup>0.508<\/sup> \u00d7 Z<sup>0.492<\/sup> is used for tighter engineering estimates. Safe stacking load is then: <strong>P<sub>safe<\/sub> = BCT \u00d7 SF \u00d7 DF<\/strong>, applying a safety factor SF (typically 0.50\u20130.60 for humidity and storage time derating) and a stacking distribution factor DF.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hypothetical worked example (labeled illustrative):<\/strong> A 400 \u00d7 300 \u00d7 300 mm shipper (Z = 1400 mm). ECT-32 C-flute (caliper \u2248 4.0 mm): BCT \u2248 5.87 \u00d7 32 \u00d7 \u221a(4.0 \u00d7 1400) \u2248 4,980 N (~560 kgf). ECT-44 BC-flute (caliper \u2248 7.0 mm): BCT \u2248 5.87 \u00d7 44 \u00d7 \u221a(7.0 \u00d7 1400) \u2248 8,110 N (~910 kgf) \u2014 a ~63% uplift, driven by both ECT and caliper terms in the McKee square-root relationship. Apply SF = 0.55 for 30-day ocean transit + 90-day warehouse dwell, and the ECT-32 case derates to ~2,740 N usable top-load versus ~4,460 N for ECT-44. If your pallet top layer carries 25 kg\/box \u00d7 4 boxes = 1,000 N dynamic load, ECT-32 is marginal; ECT-44 carries comfortable margin.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:18px 0;padding:14px 18px;background:#eff6ff;border-radius:8px;border:1px solid #bfdbfe;\"><strong>\u3010\ud83d\udca1 Packaging Engineer&#8217;s Quick Q&amp;A\u3011<\/strong><br \/><strong>Q:<\/strong> If the McKee formula derives BCT from ECT, why do overseas enterprise POs still mandate Mullen burst testing?<br \/><strong>A:<\/strong> Directly: because Mullen burst (TAPPI T810) measures multi-directional ply bonding and puncture resistance that ECT cannot capture. Mechanically: ECT is a uniaxial column test; rough-handling puncture failures at box corners are governed by inter-fiber bond strength, which burst testing (e.g., 200 lb\/in\u00b2 = 32 ECT equivalence legacy rating) screens independently. Procurement recommendation: specify ECT for stacking-driven loads and retain a 250 lb\/in\u00b2 Mullen minimum clause for export shipments routed through high-drop intermodal hubs.<\/div>\n<h2>ECT-32 vs ECT-44: Comparative Specification Matrix<\/h2>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:14px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">Parameter<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">ECT-32<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">ECT-44<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">Governing Standard \/ Test Protocol<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Typical construction<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">C-flute (3.6\u20134.0 mm), 175\/150\/175 gsm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">BC double-wall (6.5\u20137.0 mm), 200\/150\/150\/200 gsm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 3034 (caliper) \/ TAPPI T 811<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Edge crush resistance<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">32 lb\/in \u2248 5.6 kN\/m<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">44 lb\/in \u2248 7.7 kN\/m<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">TAPPI T 811 \/ ISO 3037<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Hypothetical BCT, 1400 mm perimeter<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u2248 4,980 N<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u2248 8,110 N<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">McKee formula per TAPPI T810 (2026 Revision)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Compression verification<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"2\" style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Lansmont or equivalent platen test, 12.7 mm\/min ramp, 10-specimen average<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ASTM D642 \/ ISO 12048<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Distribution cycle fit<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">\u22644 pallet layers, LTL domestic<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">5\u20137 layers, export\/ocean, FBA bulk pallets<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ASTM D4169 DC-13 \/ ISTA 3A<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Moisture derating (90% RH exposure)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">35\u201350% BCT loss typical<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">30\u201345% BCT loss typical<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 2247 (conditioned humidity cycling)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Sustainability compliance<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"2\" style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Both grades: mono-material recyclable fiber, PFAS-free barrier options<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">EU PPWR (2024\/1991) \/ FTC Green Guides 16 CFR Part 260<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Engineering Lab Bench Test Record \u2014 Reference Conditions\u3011<\/strong><br \/>Valid comparative ECT\/BCT data is only comparable when generated under standardized conditioning: 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% RH per ASTM D685; instruments such as a Mitutoyo 547-400S digital caliper (tolerance \u00b10.15 mm), Lansmont compression tester, and TAPPI T810 Mullen burst tester; 10-specimen statistical averages per lot. Any supplier quote without stated conditioning and sample size should be treated as non-verified. Numerical BCT values in this article are hypothetical worked examples, not measured test records.<\/aside>\n<h2>Multi-Regional Logistics Corridors: Humidity, Hubs &amp; Stacking Derating<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Pacific corridor (Asia \u2192 US West Coast):<\/strong> 25\u201335 day ocean transits expose containers to cyclic &#8220;container sweat&#8221;; interior RH can exceed 80% for days, driving Cobb 60 absorption upward and softening C-flute glue bonds. Engineering countermeasure: specify ECT-44 BC-flute for any Pacific-routed pallet with \u22655 layers, plus desiccant load of \u2265200 g per m\u00b3 container volume for high-value cargo.<\/p>\n<p><strong>US inland distribution:<\/strong> California Inland Empire nodes (FBA ONT8\/LGB3 region) and the Texas DFW triangle impose high-temperature, dry-to-arid warehouse conditions where stack dwell times of 60\u201390 days are common; here BCT creep under sustained load \u2014 not humidity \u2014 dominates, and a time-derating factor of 0.6 on virgin BCT is standard engineering practice.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Atlantic \/ European corridor (Rotterdam multimodal):<\/strong> Port of Rotterdam rail\/road transfer adds handling vibration and coastal humidity; per EU PPWR (2024\/1991) mandates, board must remain recyclable \u2014 so avoid wax coatings and specify PFAS-free barrier treatments instead. In strict accordance with ASTM D4169 Distribution Cycle DC-13 and under ISTA 3A General Simulation Performance Testing protocol, drop shock sequences and random vibration profiles should be run on the final ECT-44 BC construction before first production release.<\/p>\n<p>Verify your own corridor-specific safe stack load interactively using TadaPack&#8217;s free calculators at <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\">https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Four-Step SOP: Specifying &amp; Verifying ECT Grade on the Shopfloor<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Step 1 \u2014 Define load case.<\/strong> Calculate maximum stacked top load (kg per pallet layer \u00d7 layers), target safety factor (0.55 humid export \/ 0.60 dry inland), and storage duration; back-solve minimum BCT via P<sub>safe<\/sub> requirement.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 2 \u2014 Select construction via McKee.<\/strong> Use BCT = 5.87 \u00d7 ECT \u00d7 \u221a(h \u00d7 Z) with candidate calipers (C-flute \u2248 4.0 mm, BC \u2248 7.0 mm, \u00b10.15 mm tolerance) to choose between ECT-32 and ECT-44; confirm flute direction is perpendicular to load axis on all panels.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 3 \u2014 Lab verification.<\/strong> Condition 10 specimens at 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% RH (ISO 186:2020), run ASTM D642 compression at 12.7 mm\/min, and record the 10-specimen mean versus calculated McKee BCT; acceptance band \u00b110%. Add ISTA 3A drop\/vibration sequence for export SKUs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 4 \u2014 Incoming QC gate.<\/strong> Sample 3 boxes per incoming lot for ECT per TAPPI T 811; reject if lot mean falls below 95% of specified ECT; log caliper with \u00b10.15 mm tolerance and Cobb 60 value (&lt;35 g\/m\u00b2 for export board).<\/p>\n<h2>Defect Diagnostics &amp; Troubleshooting Matrix<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Defect 1: Pallet-layer box bulging \/ column buckling after ocean transit.<\/strong> Root cause: ECT-32 board absorbing 8\u201312% moisture, reducing effective ECT by 30%+ and glue-bond shear strength. Corrective action: upgrade to ECT-44 BC-flute, switch to PFAS-free water-resistant starch adhesive, raise desiccant loading, and re-verify with ISO 2247 humidity-cycled compression test.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Defect 2: Flap popping \/ panel warp after die-cutting.<\/strong> Root cause: creasing matrix durometer or die registration drift \u2014 crease-to-slot misregistration beyond \u00b10.5 mm or a worn creasing matrix (should be ~45-durometer rule profile) concentrates stress along score lines, collapsing caliper locally. Corrective action: recalibrate die registration to \u00b10.15 mm, replace creasing matrices, and re-check ECT on trimmed production samples rather than board-stock samples, since converting can reduce effective ECT by 5\u20138%.<\/p>\n<p>For structural prototyping, CAD dieline iteration, and lot-specific compression validation before tooling release, TadaPack&#8217;s custom structural packaging services (https:\/\/tadapack.com) provide engineer-led board-grade optimization and pre-shipment ASTM D642 test coordination.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<section class=\"topic-cluster-links\" style=\"margin-top:28px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><h3 style=\"margin-top:0;font-size:17px;color:#1e293b;\">Recommended Engineering Reading<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;padding-left:20px;color:#3b82f6;line-height:1.7;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/plastic-free-grayboard-inserts-soft-touch-laminate-expo-transport-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Plastic-Free Grayboard Inserts &#038; Soft-Touch Laminate: Expo Transport Guide<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/magnetic-double-door-rigid-box-hinge-durability-testing-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Magnetic Double-Door Rigid Box: Hinge Durability Testing Guide<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/section>\n<section class=\"tools-recom-box\" style=\"margin-top:24px;padding:20px;background:#f8fafc;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:8px;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;\"><div style=\"display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;margin-bottom:14px;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:8px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;\"><span style=\"color:#2563eb;font-weight:700;\">[TOOLS]<\/span> Featured Engineering &#038; Calculation Tools<\/h3>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#2563eb;text-decoration:none;font-weight:500;\">Explore 70+ Packaging Tools \u2794<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"tools-grid\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));gap:14px;margin-top:10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/box-compression-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">BCT &#038; Stacking<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Box Compression (BCT) Calculator<\/h4>\nPredict box compressive limit and stacking safety factors via McKee formula.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/edge-crush-test-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">ECT Testing<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Edge Crush Test (ECT) Calculator<\/h4>\nCalculate linerboard ring crush and composite ECT ratings for optimal board specs.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div><\/section>\n<p><!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<!-- Google & AI GEO Schema.org Structured Data --><br \/>\n<!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Engineering-grade ECT-32 vs ECT-44 comparison: TAPPI T810 McKee stacking formula, BCT derating, humidity losses, freight corridor loads &#038; 2026 procurement guidance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3757","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-custom-packaging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3757","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3757"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3757\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3757"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3757"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3757"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}