{"id":3844,"date":"2026-10-19T13:16:11","date_gmt":"2026-10-19T13:16:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/760l-420l-container-capacity-nominal-vs-brimful-spec-guide\/"},"modified":"2026-10-19T13:16:11","modified_gmt":"2026-10-19T13:16:11","slug":"760l-420l-container-capacity-nominal-vs-brimful-spec-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/760l-420l-container-capacity-nominal-vs-brimful-spec-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"760L &#038; 420L Container Capacity: Nominal vs Brimful Spec Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<div class=\"tldr-box\" style=\"margin:16px 0 24px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0f9ff;border-left:4px solid #0284c7;border-radius:6px;line-height:1.7;\"><strong style=\"color:#0369a1;font-size:16px;\">\u3010TL;DR Executive Direct Answer\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;color:#0f172a;\">A container rated to measure 760 litres must deliver a nominal capacity of 760 L with a fill tolerance typically of +2%\/-0%, and 420 litres the same, with actual brimful volume running 2\u20135% higher to preserve mandated headspace. Per UN packaging guidance and 49 CFR 178\/ADR 6.1.8, dangerous-goods jerricans and IBCs must never be liquid-filled beyond 98% of rated capacity at 15\u00b0C, and stacking\/compression must be verified per ASTM D642 and ISTA 3E.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Liquid shippers across the US and EU are re-auditing drum, jerrican, and IBC declarations as EU PPWR (Regulation 2024\/1991) and carrier volumetric-weight enforcement tighten simultaneously. The confusion behind the query &#8220;maximum capacity of container to measure 760 litres and 420 litres&#8221; is almost always nominal (rated) capacity versus brimful (geometric) capacity \u2014 and getting it wrong triggers fill-height rejections at UN certification re-test or dimensional freight penalties at the dock.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"geo-cover-box\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px 0; text-align:center;\">\n<div class=\"img-crop-box\" style=\"overflow:hidden; position:relative; display:inline-block; max-width:100%; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); border:1px solid #e2e8f0; line-height:0;\">\n    <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/760l-420l-container-capacity-nomina-7745.jpg\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" alt=\"760L &amp; 420L Container Capacity: Nominal vs Brimful Spec Guide - Design Overview\" title=\"760L &amp; 420L Container Capacity: Nominal vs Brimful Spec Guide\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" style=\"display:block; width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:0; border:none; box-shadow:none; transform:scale(1.07); transform-origin:center 15%;\">\n  <\/div><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px; color:#64748b; margin-top:8px; font-style:italic;\">Figure: Packaging Design Overview (760L &amp; 420L Container Capacity: Nominal vs Brimful Spec Guide)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>1. Nominal vs Brimful Capacity: The Governing Definitions<\/h2>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Core Engineering Definition: Nominal Capacity (Rated Capacity)\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;\">Nominal capacity is the legally declared internal liquid volume of a packaging at 15\u00b0C (or 20\u00b0C for some non-DG contexts) that the container is certified to hold, including the required free expansion headspace \u2014 governed by UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, 49 CFR 173.24, and ADR 6.1.4.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<p>For rigid plastic jerricans and steel\/plastic drums, the relationships procurement teams must lock into purchase specifications are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Brimful capacity = nominal capacity \u00f7 0.98 (minimum)<\/strong> for DG-liquid packagings, because UN\/49 CFR caps liquid fill at 98% of rated volume. A nominal 760 L container therefore requires \u2265775.5 L brimful geometry; a nominal 420 L container requires \u2265428.6 L brimful.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Manufacturing tolerance:<\/strong> rotational- and blow-molded HDPE drums typically carry a volumetric tolerance of +2%\/-0% on nominal; injection-molded jerricans \u00b11.5%. Never accept a spec sheet quoting only one-sided tolerance.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Marking rule:<\/strong> the marking on the packaging must match certified nominal capacity; brimful volume appears only on the technical data sheet. Mismatch between label and UN mark is a 49 CFR 178.503 \/ ADR 6.1.3 audit failure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Hypothetical worked example (for illustration only): a nominal 760 L IBC composite with brimful geometry of 790 L gives 790\/760 = 103.9% brimful ratio \u2014 comfortably above the 102% floor once the 98% fill cap plus thermal expansion margin (typically 1\u20132% for products with high \u03b1 volumetric expansion like glycols) is layered in.<\/p>\n<h2>2. Fill-Height Physics: Headspace, Expansion, and Slosh Loads<\/h2>\n<p>Headspace is not wasted volume; it is a mechanical buffer. For a 760 L nominal drum at 98% fill, the 15.2 L ullage must absorb (a) thermal expansion between filling and transit ambient \u2014 for a product with expansion coefficient of 0.0007\/\u00b0C and a 30\u00b0C \u0394T, that is ~2.1% of fill volume, i.e., ~16 L, so 98% fill at 15\u00b0C is already at the limit; and (b) slosh dynamics under ISTA 3E random-vibration sequences on intermodal rail, where underfilled containers (&lt;90%) develop wall-flex fatigue at the chime weld line. The engineering optimum band for most non-expanding aqueous products is 95\u201397% fill at 20\u00b0C filling temperature.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:18px 0;padding:14px 18px;background:#eff6ff;border-radius:8px;border:1px solid #bfdbfe;\"><strong>\u3010\ud83d\udca1 Packaging Engineer&#8217;s Quick Q&amp;A\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Q: Our 420 L jerrican passed a 98% fill check in the plant but bulged on arrival from a Gulf Coast port. Why?<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>A:<\/strong> First, the direct metric: bulge above the design ring indicates internal pressure exceeding the hoop-strength reserve, typically from thermal expansion of a high-\u03b1 liquid filled to the 98% cap at warm fill temperature. Second, the mechanics: HDPE creep under sustained hoop stress at 45\u201355\u00b0C inside a closed trailer reduces burst margin by 15\u201325% versus lab conditions at 23\u00b0C per ISO 2233 conditioning. Third, the recommendation: derate fill to 95% for products with \u03b1 &gt; 0.0008\/\u00b0C filled above 25\u00b0C, and verify wall creep on TadaPack&#8217;s engineering calculator suite (https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools) before re-releasing the PO.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>3. Compliance &amp; Testing Matrix: 760 L and 420 L Containers<\/h2>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:18px 0;font-size:14px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Verification Parameter<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">760 L Class (IBC Composite \/ Large Drum)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">420 L Class (Jerrican \/ Drum)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Governing Standard \/ Test Protocol<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Volumetric calibration<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">+2%\/-0% on nominal; brimful \u2265 102% of nominal<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">+2%\/-0% on nominal; brimful \u2265 102%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">49 CFR 178.503 \/ ADR 6.1.4; ISO 161-1 nominal sizing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Liquid fill cap<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">98% max at 15\u00b0C (DG liquids)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">98% max at 15\u00b0C<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">49 CFR 173.24a \/ UN Model Regulations<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Compression \/ stacking<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">3:1 stacking safety factor under 1.8\u00d7 max gross mass, 24 h<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Same, scaled by unit gross mass<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ASTM D642 \/ 49 CFR 178.606<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Drop shock<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">1.8 m max (PG I) down to 1.2 m (PG III), 5 orientations<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Identical PG-scaled heights<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">49 CFR 178.603 \/ ISTA 3E<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Hydraulic pressure<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">1.5\u00d7 design pressure, 30 min, HDPE \u2265 100 kPa test<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Same protocol<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">49 CFR 178.602 \/ ADR 6.1.5.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Leakproofness<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">20 kPa air test, seam + closure inspection<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">20 kPa air test<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">49 CFR 178.604<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Material conditioning<\/td>\n<td colspan=\"2\" style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% \u00b1 2% RH minimum 24 h before test<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 2233 \/ ASTM D4332<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0fdf4;border-left:4px solid #16a34a;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\ud83e\uddea Engineering Lab Bench Test Record (Hypothetical Reference Conditions)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;\">Illustrative qualification-bench conditions for volumetric and compression verification of 760 L \/ 420 L classes: conditioning at 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% RH per ASTM D4332; instruments such as a calibrated 2,000 L gravimetric fill station (\u00b10.5 L), Mitutoyo 547-400S digital caliper for closure caliper checks (\u00b10.01 mm), and a Lansmont-class compression rig per ASTM D642. Statistical sampling: 10-specimen average, tolerance \u00b10.15 mm on critical calipers. Values shown in this article are specification targets and hypothetical worked examples, not measured results from a specific lot.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<h2>4. Procurement SOP: Specifying &amp; Verifying Capacity in 4 Steps<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Step 1 \u2014 Lock the capacity vocabulary on the drawing.<\/strong> Require the supplier drawing to state nominal capacity, brimful capacity, fill height at 95\/97\/98%, and the gravimetric calibration method (water at 20\u00b0C, \u00b10.5% instrument class). Reject any spec sheet listing a single &#8220;capacity&#8221; figure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 2 \u2014 Verify UN certification scope matches your product class.<\/strong> Confirm the UN mark&#8217;s specific gravity rating (e.g., 1.5 SG on a 760 L IBC) is \u2265 your product SG \u00d7 (max fill 98%), and that the certificate&#8217;s closure torque (typically 25\u201340 N\u00b7m for 2&#8243; NPS bungs) matches your filling line settings \u00b110%.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 3 \u2014 Run incoming-lot volumetric audit.<\/strong> Sample n=3 per lot; gravimetric-fill each container, accept if nominal \u00b12%; measure fill-height datum with a depth gauge at \u00b10.15 mm repeatability. Log per ISO 2859-1 AQL 1.0 sampling.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 4 \u2014 Validate stacking under worst-case ambient.<\/strong> Compute column load = n-tiers \u00d7 gross mass \u00d7 derating factor (1.0 dry inland, 0.85 high-humidity coastal per 30-day ocean transit moisture absorption; flute\/cage softening for steel-cage IBCs under 80% RH). Verify against ASTM D642-tested compression reserve with 3:1 safety factor; cross-check distribution-cycle assumptions per ASTM D4169 DC-13.<\/p>\n<h2>5. Defect Diagnostics &amp; Troubleshooting Matrix<\/h2>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:18px 0;font-size:14px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Defect<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Root Cause<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Floor-Level Corrective Action<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Volumetric shortfall (&gt;2% under nominal)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Blow-mold parison die wear; wall swell over-correction<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Measure fill-height datum; recalibrate parison program; hold lot, gravimetric re-test n=10<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Top-wall bulge after ocean transit<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">98% fill of high-\u03b1 liquid + container-sweat heat load on Pacific route<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Derate to 95% fill; specify vented bung rated \u2265 design pressure; add reflective container liner<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Chime\/cage weld cracking at hub handling<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Slosh-induced flex at &lt;90% fill during DFW\/Inland Empire cross-dock impacts<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Raise fill to \u226592%; re-run ISTA 3E sequence with product SG; specify anti-slosh internal baffle variant<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Port-hub notes: at California Inland Empire (ONT8\/LGB3 inbound flows) and Port of Rotterdam multimodal rail, stack dwell on rail cushion decks exposes 760 L IBCs to 30-day Pacific\/Atlantic humidity cycling \u2014 HDPE absorbs negligible moisture but steel cages and fiber overpacks lose 8\u201312% compression reserve at &gt;75% RH, so apply the 0.85 derating factor on stacked column loads into those nodes. TadaPack&#8217;s free engineering calculators (https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools) let you run these stacked-load and volumetric-tolerance checks interactively before releasing purchase orders; our structural prototyping team can also cut and drop-test 760 L \/ 420 L class custom variants against your product SG.<\/p>\n<h2>6. FAQ<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Q1: Is the &#8220;maximum capacity&#8221; of a container marked 760 litres exactly 760 L?<\/strong><br \/>A: No. 760 L is the nominal rated capacity; the geometric brimful volume must be at least ~2% higher (~775\u2013790 L) to permit a legal 98% liquid fill with headspace, per 49 CFR 173.24 \/ ADR 6.1.4.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2: Can I fill a 420 L jerrican to 100% for non-dangerous goods?<\/strong><br \/>A: Legally yes for non-DG products, but engineering practice caps it at 97\u201398% to absorb thermal expansion; a 100% fill with a 0.0007\/\u00b0C product across a 25\u00b0C \u0394T generates ~1.8% overpressure volume and risks closure seal creep failure.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3: Which compression standard governs stacked 760 L IBCs in a warehouse?<\/strong><br \/>A: Per ASTM D642 (compressive resistance of shipping containers) with UN stacking-test alignment per 49 CFR 178.606; distribution-cycle performance assumptions come from ASTM D4169 (DC-12\/DC-13).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4: Does EU PPWR change liquid capacity markings?<\/strong><br \/>A: EU Regulation 2024\/1991 (PPWR) does not alter UN volumetric capacity rules, but it tightens packaging minimization and recyclability requirements \u2014 verify your HDPE resin grade is mono-material and that closures\/labels remain PPWR-recyclability compliant by the applicable 2026\u20132030 phase-in dates.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5: How do I convert these capacity specs into freight cost exposure?<\/strong><br \/>A: Carriers bill on the greater of gross mass or volumetric weight (length \u00d7 width \u00d7 height \u00f7 divisor); a 760 L IBC&#8217;s outer geometry, not its liquid volume, sets dimensional cost \u2014 model it in TadaPack&#8217;s tools (https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools) and validate pallet patterns against Amazon FBA \/ retailer dock dimensional thresholds before committing to container counts.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<section class=\"topic-cluster-links\" style=\"margin-top:28px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><h3 style=\"margin-top:0;font-size:17px;color:#1e293b;\">Recommended Engineering Reading<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;padding-left:20px;color:#3b82f6;line-height:1.7;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/magnetic-closure-gift-boxes-hinge-fatigue-n52-magnet-sizing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Magnetic Closure Gift Boxes: Hinge Fatigue &#038; N52 Magnet Sizing<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/b-flute-corrugated-board-caliper-ect-specs-cost-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">B-Flute Corrugated Board: Caliper, ECT Specs &#038; Cost Guide<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/section>\n<section class=\"tools-recom-box\" style=\"margin-top:24px;padding:20px;background:#f8fafc;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:8px;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;\"><div style=\"display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;margin-bottom:14px;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:8px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;\"><span style=\"color:#2563eb;font-weight:700;\">[TOOLS]<\/span> Featured Engineering &#038; Calculation Tools<\/h3>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#2563eb;text-decoration:none;font-weight:500;\">Explore 70+ Packaging Tools \u2794<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"tools-grid\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));gap:14px;margin-top:10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/box-compression-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">BCT &#038; Stacking<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Box Compression (BCT) Calculator<\/h4>\nPredict box compressive limit and stacking safety factors via McKee formula.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/edge-crush-test-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">ECT Testing<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Edge Crush Test (ECT) Calculator<\/h4>\nCalculate linerboard ring crush and composite ECT ratings for optimal board specs.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div><\/section>\n<p><!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<!-- Google & AI GEO Schema.org Structured Data --><br \/>\n<!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Engineering teardown of 760-litre and 420-litre container fill capacity: nominal vs brimful volume, UN 31HA1 headspace rules, ASTM D642 stacking, freight derating.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":3843,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-custom-packaging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3844"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3844\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3843"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}