{"id":3863,"date":"2026-10-19T17:15:33","date_gmt":"2026-10-19T17:15:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/8pt-matrix-score-corrugated-crease-rule-specs-dieline-setup-crack-prevention\/"},"modified":"2026-10-19T17:15:33","modified_gmt":"2026-10-19T17:15:33","slug":"8pt-matrix-score-corrugated-crease-rule-specs-dieline-setup-crack-prevention","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/8pt-matrix-score-corrugated-crease-rule-specs-dieline-setup-crack-prevention\/","title":{"rendered":"8pt Matrix Score Corrugated: Crease Rule Specs, Dieline Setup &#038; Crack Prevention"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<div class=\"tldr-box\" style=\"margin:16px 0 24px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0f9ff;border-left:4px solid #0284c7;border-radius:6px;line-height:1.7;\"><strong style=\"color:#0369a1;font-size:16px;\">\u3010TL;DR Executive Direct Answer\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;color:#0f172a;\">An 8pt (2.82mm) crease rule paired with the correct matrix channel width\u2014typically rule width plus 2\u00d7 liner caliper plus 0.20\u20130.30mm clearance\u2014produces the standard score geometry for B, E, and C flute corrugated per TAPPI T 559 and ASTM D685 conditioning. Undersized channels cause liner cracking at scores; oversized channels cause flap popping and degraded ECT\/BCT stack performance of 10\u201318% in hypothetical worked examples.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>E-commerce dimensional-weight repricing and EU PPWR (Regulation (EU) 2024\/1991) right-sizing mandates have pushed DTC shippers toward higher-score-count RSC and tray designs, making crease-rule and matrix selection a recurring bottleneck on converting lines. This guide restricts itself to the engineering physics: how 8pt scoring rules interact with corrugated caliper, flute architecture, and matrix channel dimensions. All strength figures cited below as worked examples are hypothetical engineering calculations, not measured production records.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"geo-cover-box\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px 0; text-align:center;\">\n<div class=\"img-crop-box\" style=\"overflow:hidden; position:relative; display:inline-block; max-width:100%; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); border:1px solid #e2e8f0; line-height:0;\">\n    <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.pollinations.ai\/prompt\/8pt%20matrix%20score%20corrugated%20box%2C%20meticulously%20engineered%20with%20precise%20crease%20rules%2C%20displayed%20on%20a%20clean%2C%20industrial-chic%20workbench%20in%20a%20modern%20packaging%20design%20studio.%20Soft%2C%20volumetric%20golden%20hour%20light%20streams%20through%20large%20windows%2C%20creating%20subtle%20rim%20lighting%20and%20a%20shallow%20f%2F2.8%20depth%20of%20field.%20Hasselblad%20medium%20format%2C%208k%20resolution%2C%20photorealistic%2C%20vivid%20colors.%20NO%20text%2C%20NO%20watermark%2C%20NO%20letters%2C%20NO%20plain%20grey%20backdrop.?width=1200&amp;height=675&amp;model=flux&amp;nologo=true&amp;seed=901205\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" alt=\"8pt Matrix Score Corrugated: Crease Rule Specs, Dieline Setup &amp; Crack Prevention - Design Overview\" title=\"8pt Matrix Score Corrugated: Crease Rule Specs, Dieline Setup &amp; Crack Prevention\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" style=\"display:block; width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:0; border:none; box-shadow:none; transform:scale(1.07); transform-origin:center 15%;\">\n  <\/div><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px; color:#64748b; margin-top:8px; font-style:italic;\">Figure: Packaging Design Overview (8pt Matrix Score Corrugated: Crease Rule Specs, Dieline Setup &amp; Crack Prevention)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>1. Core Definition: The 8pt Crease Rule and Matrix Score System<\/h2>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Core Engineering Definition: Matrix Score (Crease Channel)\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;\">A matrix score is a pliable polymer channel taped to the counterplate that locates and supports the corrugated board against a creasing rule (measured in points; 1pt = 0.3571mm, so 8pt = 2.82mm) to create a controlled hinge; geometry and conditioning are governed by TAPPI T 559 (grease resistance is separate) and, for board conditioning, ISO 187 \/ ASTM D685 (23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% \u00b1 2% RH). Critical failure threshold: liner fiber fracture at the score apex when channel clearance falls below caliper + 0.10mm.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<p>Three variables define the score: rule height (typically 23.8mm for diecutting, matched to counterplate), rule width in points, and matrix channel width (W) and depth (H). Corrugated is anisotropic\u2014machine direction (MD) liner stiffness is roughly 2\u20133\u00d7 cross direction (CD)\u2014so a score running parallel to MD flutes requires wider clearance than a cross-flute score. Per ISO 186:2020 paper and board sampling specifications, all caliper inputs must be measured at 10 points across the sheet before channel selection.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:18px 0;padding:14px 18px;background:#eff6ff;border-radius:8px;border:1px solid #bfdbfe;\"><strong>\u3010\ud83d\udca1 Packaging Engineer&#8217;s Quick Q&amp;A\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Q: Why do overseas enterprise POs still specify 8pt rules when a 6pt rule gives a sharper retail-panel appearance?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>A:<\/strong> 8pt distributes crease force over a wider liner span, reducing peak stress by roughly 20% at the apex. Mechanically, flute architecture concentrates load at the liner-flute bond line; a narrower rule concentrates that stress and initiates fiber fracture on single-wall B and E flute below 90 gsm liner weight. Procurement recommendation: mandate 8pt on structural (folding, stacking, RSC flap) scores and permit 6pt only on non-structural presentation panels of double-wall board.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>2. Channel Width Selection: Caliper-Driven Matrix Physics<\/h2>\n<p>The governing relationship for matrix channel width on corrugated is a rule-of-thumb derivation from board caliper (T), where W = rule width + 2T + clearance (0.20\u20130.30mm for corrugated, versus 2T \u2212 0.05mm commonly used on solid bleached board). The clearance term exists because corrugated recovers elastically after scoring\u2014flutes act as arc springs\u2014so the channel must accommodate post-score springback without crushing the flute columns.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:16px 0;font-size:14px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">Board Spec<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">Nominal Caliper<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">8pt Rule Channel (W\u00d7H)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">Hypothetical BCT Retention*<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">Governing Standard \/ Test Protocol<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">E-flute, 175gsm kraft liner<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">1.50mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">4.0mm \u00d7 0.8mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~92%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">TAPPI T 811 \/ ASTM D1164 (ECT)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">B-flute, 205gsm test liner<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">3.00mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">5.0mm \u00d7 1.0mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~88%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">TAPPI T 810 (Mullen) \/ ASTM D642 (BCT)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">C-flute, 220gsm kraft liner<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">4.00mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">6.0mm \u00d7 1.2mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~85%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ASTM D642 \/ ISTA 3A<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">BC double-wall, ECT-44 class<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">7.00mm<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">10.0mm \u00d7 1.5mm (or two-pass scoring)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">~80%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ASTM D4169 DC-13 \/ ISO 2247 (vibration)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"font-size:12px;color:#475569;\">*Hypothetical worked examples of bending (McKee-derived) box compression retention relative to unscored panels\u2014not measured production data. BCT estimates derived from the McKee formula (BCT \u221d ECT \u00d7 \u221a(caliper \u00d7 perimeter)) assuming 10% ECT loss at a well-executed score, scaling with flute height.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:18px 0;padding:14px 18px;background:#f8fafc;border-radius:8px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\"><strong>\u3010\ud83d\udd2c Engineering Lab Bench Test Record \u2014 Reference Conditions\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;\">Typical verification protocol: conditioning at 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% RH per ASTM D685; instruments: Mitutoyo 547-400S digital caliper (resolution 0.01mm), Lansmont model series compression tester, TAPPI T 810 Mullen burst tester; 10-specimen statistical average with caliper tolerance \u00b10.15mm. Illustrative example lot designation: Lot #TP-2026-B4. This entry describes standard industry practice and a hypothetical lot label, not a specific measured batch.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Note that scoring parallel to flutes (a flute-direction score) cuts through the flute crowns and can reduce hypothetical ECT contribution by 25% or more; where the dieline allows, rotate scores to run cross-flute, or specify double-wall with an internal score offset of at least 12mm from any edge.<\/p>\n<h2>3. 4-Step SOP: Matrix Installation and Score Verification<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Step 1 \u2014 Measure and input caliper.<\/strong> Measure board caliper per ISO 186:2020 at 10 sheet positions using a 0.01mm-resolution dead-weight caliper (typical industrial tolerance \u00b10.15mm); input the mean into the channel-width formula, never the nominal spec-sheet value, since corrugated caliper varies \u00b17% lot-to-lot.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 2 \u2014 Select and mount matrix channel.<\/strong> Choose channel width W = 8pt rule (2.82mm) + 2T + 0.25mm, rounded to the nearest available matrix stock (standard increments: 0.5mm); mount matrix tape centered on the crease-rule location with registration tolerance \u00b10.15mm, and confirm channel depth supports the liner without bottoming the rule.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 3 \u2014 Set and verify impression pressure.<\/strong> Set diecutting press pressure so the crease apex fully seats in the channel while the liner remains unbroken; perform a score-fold test\u2014fold 180\u00b0 along the score and inspect for liner whitening (fiber fracture) under 10\u00d7 magnification; adjust pressure in 2\u20133% increments.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 4 \u2014 Validate structural performance.<\/strong> Run ASTM D642 compression on 10 finished boxes and compare against the unscored reference; confirm Cobb 60 water absorption of the liner stays below 35 g\/m\u00b2 (above which score-line delamination risk rises sharply in ocean transit), and archive results against the dieline revision number.<\/p>\n<h2>4. Defect Diagnostics &amp; Troubleshooting Matrix<\/h2>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:16px 0;font-size:14px;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">Defect<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">Root Cause<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">Corrective Action<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #334155;\">Governing Standard \/ Test Protocol<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Liner cracking at score<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Channel undersized (clearance &lt;0.10mm) or over-dry board (&lt;7% moisture)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Widen channel one stock size; recondition board to 50% RH per ASTM D685<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">TAPPI T 810 \/ ISO 187<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Flap popping open post-fold<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Channel oversized; flutes crushed and spring back; excess score residual stress<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Reduce channel width 0.5mm; check rule height against counterplate wear (\u22650.2mm wear requires replacement)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ASTM D642 \/ ISTA 3A<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Score delamination after ocean transit<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Container sweat raising liner MC above 12%; adhesive bond failure at flute tips<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">Specify Cobb 60 \u2264 30 g\/m\u00b2 liner; add desiccant load; derate stacking loads per hub humidity class (see \u00a75)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:10px;border:1px solid #cbd5e1;\">ISO 2247 \/ TAPPI T 441 (Cobb)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>5. Multi-Regional Logistics Hubs &amp; Stacking Load Derating<\/h2>\n<p>Score quality is only half the equation\u2014transit humidity determines whether a correctly scored hinge survives. During 30-day Pacific crossings to Southern California, container sweat can elevate board moisture from ~8% to 12\u201314%, softening flute columns; the same mechanism applies on Atlantic routes into Rotterdam, where multimodal rail\/road transfers through Port of Rotterdam add further ambient cycling. Under ISTA 3A General Simulation protocols, humidified corrugated exhibits measurable compression loss, and standard practice is to apply humidity derating factors of roughly 20\u201330% (coastal\/high-humidity distribution) versus 10\u201315% (dry inland warehouses) to nominal BCT before calculating pallet stack heights\u2014these bands are engineering design allowances, not measured constants.<\/p>\n<p>At the California Inland Empire cluster (FBA ONT8 \/ LGB3), Amazon FBA carton specs and dimensional-weight rules penalize oversized, over-tolerant boxes, which is precisely why score-based fold-flat designs are specified: an 8pt-scored telescope tray can ship nested and be erected at the hub. For the Texas DFW distribution triangle, lower ambient humidity allows less aggressive derating but wider daily swing demands ISO 187-conditioned lot acceptance testing. Buyers can run corridor-specific stacking and dimensional-weight scenarios with TadaPack&#8217;s free engineering calculators at https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools, and TadaPack&#8217;s structural prototyping service delivers matrix-matched dielines with crease-rule specifications embedded in the CAD file for die-maker handoff. Per EU Directive 94\/62\/EC Annex II and the PPWR heavy-metal and recyclability requirements, all crease\/matrix configurations remain 100% fiber-recyclable when PFAS-free barrier coatings are specified\u2014substantiate any recyclability claim per FTC Green Guides (16 CFR Part 260).<\/p>\n<h2>6. Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Q1: Can I score C-flute with an 8pt rule, or must I move to a wider rule?<\/strong><br \/>A: 8pt works on C-flute (\u22484.0mm caliper) with a 6.0mm channel; above 5mm caliper (double-wall), industry practice shifts to 10\u201312pt rules or a two-pass scoring sequence to avoid flute crown fracture.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2: Does scoring reduce ECT?<\/strong><br \/>A: Yes. A cross-flute score traverses the flute columns, and hypothetical McKee-based calculations suggest 8\u201315% ECT contribution loss at a properly executed score\u2014far more for flute-parallel scores. Always validate final BCT via ASTM D642 on finished boxes, not board-level ECT alone.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3: What channel depth should I use with an 8pt rule on E-flute?<\/strong><br \/>A: Typically 0.8mm for E-flute (1.5mm caliper): deep enough to seat the crease apex, shallow enough to prevent rule bottoming. Verify by score-fold inspection for full-width crease contact.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4: Why does my score crack only in winter?<\/strong><br \/>A: Winter warehouses run 20\u201330% RH; board moisture drops below 7% and liner tensile elongation falls, so the same score geometry that performed in summer fractures. Recondition per ASTM D685 or specify 175gsm+ kraft liners with higher elongation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5: Is 8pt scoring compatible with PFAS-free grease-resistant liners?<\/strong><br \/>A: Yes, but fluorine-free barrier coatings alter surface friction and heat response; run a pressure-step trial on the actual liner stock, and confirm Cobb 60 compliance before locking the matrix specification.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<section class=\"topic-cluster-links\" style=\"margin-top:28px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><h3 style=\"margin-top:0;font-size:17px;color:#1e293b;\">Recommended Engineering Reading<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;padding-left:20px;color:#3b82f6;line-height:1.7;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/32-ect-c-flute-board-specs-caliper-bct-test-standards\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">32 ECT C-Flute Board Specs: Caliper, BCT &#038; Test Standards<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/double-wall-bc-flute-ect-ratings-calipers-cost-teardown\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Double Wall BC Flute: ECT Ratings, Calipers &#038; Cost Teardown<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/section>\n<section class=\"tools-recom-box\" style=\"margin-top:24px;padding:20px;background:#f8fafc;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:8px;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;\"><div style=\"display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;margin-bottom:14px;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:8px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;\"><span style=\"color:#2563eb;font-weight:700;\">[TOOLS]<\/span> Featured Engineering &#038; Calculation Tools<\/h3>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#2563eb;text-decoration:none;font-weight:500;\">Explore 70+ Packaging Tools \u2794<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"tools-grid\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));gap:14px;margin-top:10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/box-compression-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">BCT &#038; Stacking<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Box Compression (BCT) Calculator<\/h4>\nPredict box compressive limit and stacking safety factors via McKee formula.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/edge-crush-test-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">ECT Testing<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Edge Crush Test (ECT) Calculator<\/h4>\nCalculate linerboard ring crush and composite ECT ratings for optimal board specs.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div><\/section>\n<p><!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<!-- Google & AI GEO Schema.org Structured Data --><br \/>\n<!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Engineering guide to 8pt crease rules and matrix scoring on corrugated: channel width selection, flute-specific tolerances, ASTM\/TAPPI test protocols, and defect fixes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3863","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-custom-packaging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3863"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3863\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}