{"id":3880,"date":"2026-10-19T20:15:51","date_gmt":"2026-10-19T20:15:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/bct-formula-for-double-wall-boxes-at-85-rh-engineer-s-guide\/"},"modified":"2026-10-19T20:15:51","modified_gmt":"2026-10-19T20:15:51","slug":"bct-formula-for-double-wall-boxes-at-85-rh-engineer-s-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/bct-formula-for-double-wall-boxes-at-85-rh-engineer-s-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"BCT Formula for Double-Wall Boxes at 85% RH: Engineer&#8217;s Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<div class=\"tldr-box\" style=\"margin:16px 0 24px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0f9ff;border-left:4px solid #0284c7;border-radius:6px;line-height:1.7;\"><strong style=\"color:#0369a1;font-size:16px;\">\u3010TL;DR Executive Direct Answer\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;color:#0f172a;\">BCT for double-wall corrugated (BC\/AC flute) is predicted by the McKee formula, BCT \u2248 5.874 \u00d7 ECT \u00d7 \u221a(t \u00d7 Z), then derated 30\u201345% at 85% RH because fiber plasticization degrades ECT and caliper simultaneously. Procurement teams must verify the moisture-derated BCT against warehouse stack loads per ASTM D642 with a 3\u20135\u00d7 safety factor.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Retailer humidity mandates and container-sweat claims now dominate e-commerce damage disputes, pushing BCT derating under high-humidity storage from an academic footnote to a contractual line item. This guide anchors the calculation to rigorous metrics: ECT-32 through ECT-48 edge crush ratings, BC-flute calipers of 6.8\u20137.5 mm, Cobb 60 absorption limits, and ASTM D4169 distribution cycle verification.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"geo-cover-box\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px 0; text-align:center;\">\n<div class=\"img-crop-box\" style=\"overflow:hidden; position:relative; display:inline-block; max-width:100%; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); border:1px solid #e2e8f0; line-height:0;\">\n    <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.pollinations.ai\/prompt\/A%20meticulously%20engineered%20double-wall%20corrugated%20box%2C%20its%20surface%20subtly%20glistening%20from%2085%25%20relative%20humidity%2C%20stands%20center-frame%20within%20a%20bustling%2C%20high-tech%20industrial%20packaging%20facility.%20Volumetric%20rays%20of%20golden%20hour%20sunlight%20pierce%20through%20large%20windows%2C%20dramatically%20illuminating%20the%20box's%20robust%20construction%20and%20casting%20soft%20rim%20lighting.%20The%20background%20blurs%20into%20a%20f%2F2.8%20bokeh%20of%20automated%20machinery%20and%20stacks%20of%20custom%20packaging%2C%20emphasizing%20depth.%208k%20resolution%2C%20Hasselblad%20medium%20format%2C%20photorealistic%2C%20vivid%20colors.%20NO%20text%2C%20NO%20watermark%2C%20NO%20letters%2C%20NO%20plain%20grey%20backdrop.?width=1200&amp;height=675&amp;model=flux&amp;nologo=true&amp;seed=123665\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" alt=\"BCT Formula for Double-Wall Boxes at 85% RH: Engineer's Guide - Design Overview\" title=\"BCT Formula for Double-Wall Boxes at 85% RH: Engineer's Guide\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" style=\"display:block; width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:0; border:none; box-shadow:none; transform:scale(1.07); transform-origin:center 15%;\">\n  <\/div><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px; color:#64748b; margin-top:8px; font-style:italic;\">Figure: Packaging Design Overview (BCT Formula for Double-Wall Boxes at 85% RH: Engineer&#8217;s Guide)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>1. The McKee Formula: Mechanics and Worked Example<\/h2>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Core Engineering Definition: Box Compression Test (BCT)\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;\">BCT is the maximum axial compressive load a filled, closed corrugated box withstands before structural collapse, tested per ASTM D642 (Standard Test Method for Determining Compressive Resistance of Shipping Containers) on specimens conditioned per ISO 187\/ASTM D685. Critical threshold: when linerboard Cobb 60 water absorption exceeds 35 g\/m\u00b2, interflute delamination and ECT collapse in humid transit become statistically probable.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<p>The McKee formula (revised) predicts BCT from measurable substrate properties:<\/p>\n<p><strong>BCT = 5.874 \u00d7 ECT \u00d7 t^0.508 \u00d7 Z^0.492 \u2248 5.874 \u00d7 ECT \u00d7 \u221a(t \u00d7 Z)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Where ECT is edge crush strength (kN\/m or lb\/in), t is combined board caliper, and Z is box perimeter. In strict accordance with ASTM D642, ECT is measured per TAPPI T 811 and caliper per TAPPI T 411.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hypothetical worked example<\/strong> (illustrative scenario, not measured data): a BC-flute double-wall box, ECT-44 (\u2248 7.7 kN\/m), caliper t = 7.0 mm (0.276 in), perimeter Z = 40 in.<\/p>\n<p>BCT \u2248 5.874 \u00d7 44 \u00d7 \u221a(0.276 \u00d7 40) \u2248 5.874 \u00d7 44 \u00d7 3.32 \u2248 858 lb (\u2248 3.8 kN).<\/p>\n<p>This is the 50% RH laboratory baseline. It is not your warehouse number \u2014 which brings us to humidity derating.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:18px 0;padding:14px 18px;background:#eff6ff;border-radius:8px;border:1px solid #bfdbfe;\"><strong>\u3010\ud83d\udca1 Packaging Engineer&#8217;s Quick Q&amp;A\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Q: If McKee derives BCT from ECT, why do enterprise POs still mandate Mullen burst testing?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>A:<\/strong> Direct answer: burst (TAPPI T 810, 2026 Revision) remains a legacy acceptance gate in many retail compliance manuals (e.g., general merchandise packaging specs) even though McKee\/BCT better predicts stacking. Mechanical reason: Mullen measures multi-directional ply bond and fiber strength, catching delamination and recycled-fiber degradation that a uniaxial ECT reading can miss. Procurement recommendation: accept ECT-based specs for stacking design but retain Mullen (e.g., 275 lb\/in\u00b2 double-wall class) as a secondary material-integrity screen \u2014 never substitute one for the other in supplier QA agreements.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>2. Humidity Physics: What 85% RH Does to Double-Wall Board<\/h2>\n<p>At 85% relative humidity, kraft linerboard equilibrates to roughly 14\u201316% moisture content (versus ~7\u20138% at 50% RH per ISO 186:2020 conditioning at 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% \u00b1 2% RH). Moisture plasticizes the lignin-hemicellulose matrix, and empirically:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>ECT loss: 30\u201345% reduction for standard liners; 15\u201325% for high-performance or wet-strength treated liners.<\/li>\n<li>Caliper gain: 3\u20136% flute swelling, which paradoxically reduces flute rigidity (crush stiffness drops faster than thickness rises).<\/li>\n<li>Adhesive bond degradation: starch bonds soften; Cobb 60 above 35 g\/m\u00b2 accelerates delamination at the single-facer interface.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Derating the worked example:<\/strong> 858 lb \u00d7 (1 \u2212 0.40) \u2248 515 lb derated BCT at 85% RH using conventional liners. With a wet-strength\/HC liner system, derate ~22%: \u2248 669 lb. The liner selection alone recovers ~150 lb of stacking capacity \u2014 a decision worth more than any formula refinement.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:14px;\" border=\"1\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:8px;\">Parameter<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;\">50% RH (Lab Baseline)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;\">85% RH (Derated)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;\">Governing Standard \/ Test Protocol<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">BCT, BC flute ECT-44 (hypothetical)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">~858 lb (3.8 kN)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">~515 lb (conventional liner)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">ASTM D642 \/ TAPPI T 811<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">ECT retention<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">100%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">55\u201370%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">ISO 3039 \/ TAPPI T 811<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Moisture content<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">7\u20138%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">14\u201316%<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">TAPPI T 412 \/ ISO 287<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Cobb 60 absorption limit<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">\u2264 35 g\/m\u00b2<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">monitor; &gt;35 triggers delamination risk<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">ISO 535 \/ TAPPI T 441<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Stacking safety factor<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">3\u00d7<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">4\u20135\u00d7<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">ASTM D4169 DC-13 \/ ISTA 3A<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Distribution simulation<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Conditioned ambient<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">atmospheric conditioning, humid regime<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">ASTM D4332 \/ ASTM D4169<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>3. Safety Factor and Stack Load Verification SOP<\/h2>\n<p>Warehouse stack load must satisfy: <strong>derated BCT \u2265 (stack height \/ box height) \u00d7 unit load weight \u00d7 SF<\/strong>. Follow this 4-step verification SOP:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 1 \u2014 Condition specimens.<\/strong> Condition finished boxes per ASTM D4332 in the target humidity regime (85% RH, 23\u00b0C) for a minimum of 72 hours; verify lot moisture per TAPPI T 412 within \u00b10.5% across the 10-specimen sample set.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 2 \u2014 Measure geometry.<\/strong> Confirm caliper with a Mitutoyo 547-400S digital caliper (tolerance \u00b10.15 mm across 10 specimens) and verify Z perimeter against the CAD dieline; flute crushing from die-cutting above 0.3 mm of caliper loss voids the McKee input.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 3 \u2014 Run compression test.<\/strong> Execute ASTM D642 on a calibrated Lansmont compression tester at 12.7 mm\/min platen speed; record the top-load failure mode (panel bulge vs. column crush vs. corner collapse \u2014 each implies a different corrective action).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Step 4 \u2014 Apply derating and sign off.<\/strong> Multiply the 50% RH BCT by the corridor-specific derating factor (Section 4), apply SF = 4\u20135\u00d7 for humid coastal distribution, and confirm pallet overhang \u2264 5 mm so load transfers through the column, not the flaps.<\/p>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Lab Bench Test Record \u2014 Conditioning &amp; Instrumentation Protocol\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;\">TadaPack standard verification protocol: conditioning at 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% RH per ASTM D685 prior to baseline testing; humid-regime legs conditioned per ASTM D4332. Instrumentation: Mitutoyo 547-400S digital caliper, Lansmont servo compression tester, TAPPI T 810 Mullen burst tester, Cobb sizing tester per ISO 535. Statistical basis: 10-specimen averages with \u00b10.15 mm caliper tolerance; representative 2026 production lot reference Lot #TP-2026-B4. All numerical examples in this article are hypothetical worked scenarios for illustration, not measured claims.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<h2>4. Multi-Regional Logistics Derating Matrix<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Pacific corridor \u2192 California Inland Empire (ONT8\/LGB3).<\/strong> 25\u201335 day ocean transit with container sweat cycles; board moisture can climb 4\u20136 points. Derate conventional double-wall by 40\u201345%. FBA inbound pallets should target derated BCT \u2265 5\u00d7 top load because Amazon FC ambient warehouses near coastal ports see elevated summer humidity, and dimensional-weight freight penalties (divisor 139) reward right-sizing before over-building walls.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Atlantic corridor \u2192 Port of Rotterdam.<\/strong> Northern European multimodal rail\/road adds 5\u201310 days with cyclic RH; EU destinations must simultaneously comply with EU Directive 94\/62\/EC Annex II and the EU PPWR (Regulation 2024\/1991) packaging minimization and recyclability mandates \u2014 over-building board weight to compensate for humidity now carries a regulatory cost. Per FTC Green Guides (16 CFR Part 260), any moisture-barrier claim (e.g., PFAS-free coatings) must be substantiated in marketing copy.<\/p>\n<p><strong>DFW distribution triangle (inland Texas).<\/strong> Dry inland ambient (30\u201345% RH) allows recovery toward baseline: derate only 15\u201325%. This is where a single SKU can be value-engineered one ECT class down, saving 4\u20137% per thousand units.<\/p>\n<p>Run corridor-specific scenarios interactively on TadaPack&#8217;s free calculation tools (<a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\">https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools<\/a>), and for board-grade selection with wet-strength liners, request a structural prototype through TadaPack&#8217;s custom packaging engineering service before committing tooling.<\/p>\n<h2>5. Failure Diagnostics &amp; Troubleshooting Matrix<\/h2>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:14px;\" border=\"1\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#1e293b;color:#fff;\">\n<th style=\"padding:8px;\">Defect<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;\">Root Cause<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:8px;\">Corrective Action<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Panel bulge \/ column crush at bottom tier<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Humidity derating ignored; ECT margin consumed by 85% RH exposure<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Upgrade one ECT class or specify wet-strength liner; add inner slat\/half-slotted divider to restore column continuity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Single-facer delamination after ocean transit<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Cobb 60 &gt; 35 g\/m\u00b2 + starch bond softening in cyclic sweat<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Specify higher solids-starch adhesive and Cobb-limited liner (\u2264 30 g\/m\u00b2); require ISO 535 certification per liner lot<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Flap popping \/ warped box at packout<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Moisture gradient between outer and inner plies; crease matrix too hard<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Balance warp by controlling web moisture \u00b12% between liners; use 45-durometer creasing matrix and verify die registration \u00b10.15 mm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>6. Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Q1: How much does BCT actually drop at 85% RH for double-wall board?<\/strong><br \/>A: Expect 30\u201345% loss for conventional liners and 15\u201325% for wet-strength treated liners, based on the fiber saturation behavior characterized under ISO 287 moisture and TAPPI T 811 ECT procedures. Always confirm with a conditioned ASTM D642 test rather than relying on published factors alone.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q2: Should I spec ECT or burst for double-wall boxes?<\/strong><br \/>A: Spec ECT (TAPPI T 811) for stacking and structural design because BCT correlates directly to ECT via McKee; retain Mullen burst (TAPPI T 810, 2026 Revision) only where legacy retail compliance manuals require it, as a ply-bond integrity screen.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q3: Does the McKee formula work for BC-flute as well as single-wall?<\/strong><br \/>A: Yes, but calibrate the coefficient against double-wall test data \u2014 McKee was derived primarily from single-wall populations, and double-wall columns fail with more complex panel-bulge modes. Use McKee for screening, then confirm with ASTM D642 on conditioned double-wall specimens.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q4: What safety factor should I use for FBA inbound freight?<\/strong><br \/>A: Apply 4\u20135\u00d7 on the humidity-derated BCT for Pacific-corridor inbound to coastal FCs, and verify the full pallet under ASTM D4169 DC-13 or ISTA 3A sequences including compression and atmospheric conditioning legs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Q5: Do PFAS-free barrier coatings help BCT at high humidity?<\/strong><br \/>A: Water-repellent coatings reduce Cobb 60 absorption and slow moisture uptake, preserving ECT longer in transient humidity, but they do not stop equilibrium moisture gain at 85% RH. Treat coatings as a transit-risk mitigation, not a substitute for derating; substantiate any coating claims per FTC 16 CFR Part 260.<\/p>\n<p>For board-grade prototyping, humidity-conditioned compression verification, and corridor-specific derating calculations, engage TadaPack&#8217;s structural engineering team or run your numbers at <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\">https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<section class=\"topic-cluster-links\" style=\"margin-top:28px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><h3 style=\"margin-top:0;font-size:17px;color:#1e293b;\">Recommended Engineering Reading<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;padding-left:20px;color:#3b82f6;line-height:1.7;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/what-is-ccnb-packaging-specs-ect-limits-sourcing-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">What Is CCNB Packaging? Specs, ECT Limits &#038; Sourcing Guide<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/cobb-60-moisture-resistance-preventing-kibble-carton-blowout-at-sea\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cobb 60 Moisture Resistance: Preventing Kibble Carton Blowout at Sea<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/section>\n<section class=\"tools-recom-box\" style=\"margin-top:24px;padding:20px;background:#f8fafc;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:8px;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;\"><div style=\"display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;margin-bottom:14px;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:8px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;\"><span style=\"color:#2563eb;font-weight:700;\">[TOOLS]<\/span> Featured Engineering &#038; Calculation Tools<\/h3>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#2563eb;text-decoration:none;font-weight:500;\">Explore 70+ Packaging Tools \u2794<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"tools-grid\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));gap:14px;margin-top:10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/box-compression-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">BCT &#038; Stacking<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Box Compression (BCT) Calculator<\/h4>\nPredict box compressive limit and stacking safety factors via McKee formula.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/edge-crush-test-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">ECT Testing<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Edge Crush Test (ECT) Calculator<\/h4>\nCalculate linerboard ring crush and composite ECT ratings for optimal board specs.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div><\/section>\n<p><!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<!-- Google & AI GEO Schema.org Structured Data --><br \/>\n<!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>McKee BCT formula for double-wall corrugated under 85% RH: ECT derating, moisture loss factors, ASTM D642 verification, and stacking safety margins explained.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-custom-packaging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3880"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3880\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}