{"id":4440,"date":"2026-11-07T15:15:25","date_gmt":"2026-11-07T15:15:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/food-packaging-barriers-fibre-trays-board-formats-2026-specs\/"},"modified":"2026-11-07T15:15:25","modified_gmt":"2026-11-07T15:15:25","slug":"food-packaging-barriers-fibre-trays-board-formats-2026-specs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/food-packaging-barriers-fibre-trays-board-formats-2026-specs\/","title":{"rendered":"Food Packaging Barriers &#038; Fibre Trays: Board Formats [2026 Specs]"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<aside class=\"authority-citation-box\" style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0fdf4;border-left:4px solid #16a34a;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>Packaging Europe \/ Innovation Horizon\uff1aFood<\/strong><br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/packagingeurope.com\/food\/290.subject?page=122\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/packagingeurope.com\/food\/290.subject?page=122<\/a><br \/><em>Declaration: This review summarizes the public document above and adds practical packaging guidance from TadaPack; figures not attributed to the source are typical industry reference values.<\/em><\/aside>\n<div class=\"tldr-box\" style=\"margin:16px 0 24px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f0f9ff;border-left:4px solid #0284c7;border-radius:6px;line-height:1.7;\"><strong style=\"color:#0369a1;font-size:16px;\">\u3010TL;DR Executive Direct Answer\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;color:#0f172a;\">The 2026 food packaging landscape is defined by high-caliper laminated folding boxboard (e.g. Holmen Incada Duo), ultra-high-barrier metallized BOPP (Innovia Propafilm CHBM), starch-based grease barriers from UPM\/Ingredion\/Paramelt, and the world&#8217;s first resealable fibre tray from Cirkla, Belmark and Ossid. Procurement teams should benchmark these formats against ECT-32\/ECT-44 corrugated shipper requirements, Cobb 60 absorption limits and EU PPWR (2024\/1991) design-for-recycling criteria using TadaPack&#8217;s free engineering tools.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<ul class=\"key-takeaways\">\n<li>Barrier no longer requires plastic lamination everywhere: metallized BOPP films and starch-based grease barriers are converging on mono-material, recyclable architectures.<\/li>\n<li>High-caliper laminated folding boxboard (Incada Duo-class) enables premium food cartons with reduced setup-labour versus rigid greyboard laminating.<\/li>\n<li>Resealable fibre trays and paper flowpacks (Koehler NexPlus for Babybel two-packs) demonstrate that closure functionality is migrating into fibre substrates.<\/li>\n<li>Brand-level adoption (Cheerios adding a resealable Ziploc bag inside the existing box) shows incremental barrier upgrades can ship without redesigning the secondary package.<\/li>\n<li>Qualification must anchor to ECT (TAPPI T811), Cobb 60 (TAPPI T441 \/ ISO 535) and ISTA 3A transit data, not marketing barrier claims.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<figure class=\"geo-cover-box\" style=\"margin:0 0 24px 0; text-align:center;\">\n<div class=\"img-crop-box\" style=\"overflow:hidden; position:relative; display:inline-block; max-width:100%; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 6px 18px rgba(0,0,0,0.06); border:1px solid #e2e8f0; line-height:0;\">\n    <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/food-packaging-barriers-fibre-trays-1385.jpg\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" alt=\"Food Packaging Barriers &amp; Fibre Trays: Board Formats [2026 Specs] - Design Overview\" title=\"Food Packaging Barriers &amp; Fibre Trays: Board Formats [2026 Specs]\" loading=\"eager\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" style=\"display:block; width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:0; border:none; box-shadow:none; transform:scale(1.07); transform-origin:center 15%;\">\n  <\/div><figcaption style=\"font-size:13px; color:#64748b; margin-top:8px; font-style:italic;\">Figure: Packaging Design Overview (Food Packaging Barriers &amp; Fibre Trays: Board Formats [2026 Specs])<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>What Actually Launched: Barriers, Boards and Resealable Fibre Formats<\/h2>\n<p>Packaging Europe&#8217;s food roundup documents a cluster of launches that map cleanly onto three material physics problems: gas and aroma barrier, grease barrier, and functional closure on fibre. Holmen&#8217;s <strong>Incada Duo<\/strong> is a laminated folding box board targeted at high-caliper packaging in premium food, beverage and cosmetics \u2014 a direct challenge to greyboard-laminated rigid cartons. Innovia Films introduced <strong>Propafilm CHBM<\/strong>, an ultra-high barrier metallized BOPP film for product protection. UPM is working with Ingredion and Paramelt on <strong>starch-based grease barriers<\/strong> for recyclable paper food packaging \u2014 the PFAS-free answer regulators in both the EU and several US states now effectively demand.<\/p>\n<p>On the tray and flowpack side, Cirkla, Belmark and Ossid claim a <strong>world&#8217;s-first resealable fibre tray<\/strong>, while Koehler&#8217;s <strong>NexPlus<\/strong> recyclable paper flowpack runs Babybel two-packs. Cheerios adopting a resealable Ziploc bag inside its existing box rounds out the picture: barrier and closure functionality is being added with minimum structural disruption. Per EU Regulation 2024\/1991 (PPWR), all fibre formats must be designed for recyclability \u2014 which is precisely why starch-based barriers and paper flowpacks are commercially timed now.<\/p>\n<aside style=\"margin:20px 0;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><strong>\u3010Core Engineering Definition: Cobb 60 Water Absorption (g\/m\u00b2)\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0;\">Cobb 60 quantifies the mass of water absorbed by 1 m\u00b2 of paperboard surface in 60 seconds under ISO 535 \/ TAPPI T441; for grease-barrier and starch-coated food boards, uncontrolled Cobb 60 above typical industry reference thresholds (\u224830\u201335 g\/m\u00b2 for uncoated kraft classes) signals coating breakdown risk, fibre swelling and loss of tray stiffness in chilled or high-RH distribution.<\/p>\n<\/aside>\n<figure class=\"packaging-engineering-diagram\" style=\"margin:26px 0 30px;width:100%;display:block;clear:both;\"><svg viewBox=\"0 0 800 400\" data-diagram-fingerprint=\"12a77716d9f70333\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" role=\"img\" aria-labelledby=\"diag-title-14 diag-desc-14\" style=\"width:100%;height:auto;aspect-ratio:800\/400;display:block;border-radius:10px;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;background:#ffffff;box-shadow:0 2px 8px -2px rgba(15,23,42,0.06),0 1px 3px rgba(15,23,42,0.04);font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;\"><title id=\"diag-title-14\">Fibre-First Food Packaging Qualification Loop<\/title><desc id=\"diag-desc-14\">1. Substrate Screening \u2192 2. Structural Design \u2192 3. Strength Verification \u2192 4. Transit &amp; Compliance Sign-off<\/desc><rect x=\"0\" y=\"0\" width=\"800\" height=\"44\" fill=\"#f8fafc\" stroke=\"#e2e8f0\" stroke-width=\"1\"><\/rect><circle cx=\"24\" cy=\"22\" r=\"4.5\" fill=\"#0284c7\"><\/circle><text x=\"38\" y=\"27\" font-size=\"14\" font-weight=\"700\" fill=\"#0f172a\">Fibre-First Food Packaging Qualification Loop<\/text><rect x=\"586\" y=\"10\" width=\"190\" height=\"24\" rx=\"4\" fill=\"#f0f9ff\" stroke=\"#bae6fd\" stroke-width=\"1\"><\/rect><text x=\"681\" y=\"26\" font-size=\"11\" font-weight=\"600\" fill=\"#0369a1\" text-anchor=\"middle\">EU PPWR \u00b7 ISTA 3A<\/text><ellipse cx=\"400\" cy=\"188\" rx=\"270\" ry=\"108\" fill=\"none\" stroke=\"#cbd5e1\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-dasharray=\"6,5\"><\/ellipse><circle cx=\"400\" cy=\"188\" r=\"44\" fill=\"#ecfdf5\" stroke=\"#16a34a\" stroke-width=\"1.6\"><\/circle><text x=\"400\" y=\"193\" font-size=\"13\" font-weight=\"800\" fill=\"#166534\" text-anchor=\"middle\">Recyclable Fo\u2026<\/text><polygon points=\"542.4,137.0 526.3,136.3 530.3,126.3\" fill=\"#94a3b8\"><\/polygon><rect x=\"324.0\" y=\"58.0\" width=\"152\" height=\"44\" rx=\"8\" fill=\"#ffffff\" stroke=\"#0284c7\" stroke-width=\"1.8\"><\/rect><text x=\"400.0\" y=\"77.0\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"800\" fill=\"#0284c7\" text-anchor=\"middle\">1. Substrate Scree\u2026<\/text><text x=\"400.0\" y=\"94.0\" font-size=\"10.5\" font-weight=\"500\" fill=\"#64748b\" text-anchor=\"middle\">Compare high-caliper F\u2026<\/text><polygon points=\"527.6,245.0 539.7,234.3 543.7,244.3\" fill=\"#94a3b8\"><\/polygon><rect x=\"594.0\" y=\"166.0\" width=\"152\" height=\"44\" rx=\"8\" fill=\"#ffffff\" stroke=\"#16a34a\" stroke-width=\"1.8\"><\/rect><text x=\"670.0\" y=\"185.0\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"800\" fill=\"#16a34a\" text-anchor=\"middle\">2. Structural Desi\u2026<\/text><text x=\"670.0\" y=\"202.0\" font-size=\"10.5\" font-weight=\"500\" fill=\"#64748b\" text-anchor=\"middle\">Set dieline with \u00b10.15\u2026<\/text><polygon points=\"257.6,239.0 273.7,239.7 269.7,249.7\" fill=\"#94a3b8\"><\/polygon><rect x=\"324.0\" y=\"274.0\" width=\"152\" height=\"44\" rx=\"8\" fill=\"#ffffff\" stroke=\"#f59e0b\" stroke-width=\"1.8\"><\/rect><text x=\"400.0\" y=\"293.0\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"800\" fill=\"#f59e0b\" text-anchor=\"middle\">3. Strength Verifi\u2026<\/text><text x=\"400.0\" y=\"310.0\" font-size=\"10.5\" font-weight=\"500\" fill=\"#64748b\" text-anchor=\"middle\">Derive BCT from ECT-32\u2026<\/text><polygon points=\"272.4,131.0 260.3,141.7 256.3,131.7\" fill=\"#94a3b8\"><\/polygon><rect x=\"54.0\" y=\"166.0\" width=\"152\" height=\"44\" rx=\"8\" fill=\"#ffffff\" stroke=\"#7c3aed\" stroke-width=\"1.8\"><\/rect><text x=\"130.0\" y=\"185.0\" font-size=\"12.5\" font-weight=\"800\" fill=\"#7c3aed\" text-anchor=\"middle\">4. Transit &amp; Compl\u2026<\/text><text x=\"130.0\" y=\"202.0\" font-size=\"10.5\" font-weight=\"500\" fill=\"#64748b\" text-anchor=\"middle\">Run ISTA 3A sequences,\u2026<\/text><rect x=\"0\" y=\"332\" width=\"800\" height=\"68\" fill=\"#f8fafc\" stroke=\"#e2e8f0\" stroke-width=\"1\"><\/rect><circle cx=\"24\" cy=\"354\" r=\"3.5\" fill=\"#0284c7\"><\/circle><text x=\"38\" y=\"358\" font-size=\"12\" font-weight=\"700\" fill=\"#0369a1\">Hand-offs between stages decide overall efficiency<\/text><text x=\"776\" y=\"358\" font-size=\"11.5\" font-weight=\"600\" fill=\"#64748b\" text-anchor=\"end\">Circular Flow<\/text><line x1=\"38\" y1=\"368\" x2=\"776\" y2=\"368\" stroke=\"#e2e8f0\" stroke-width=\"0.8\" stroke-dasharray=\"4,2\"><\/line><rect x=\"21\" y=\"379\" width=\"7\" height=\"7\" rx=\"1.5\" fill=\"#0284c7\"><\/rect><text x=\"38\" y=\"386\" font-size=\"11.5\" font-weight=\"600\" fill=\"#475569\">Stages follow the process described in the article<\/text><\/svg><figcaption style=\"margin-top:8px;font-size:12.5px;color:#64748b;text-align:center;line-height:1.4;\">Figure: Circular process flow<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>Why the Market Is Moving: PPWR Pressure Meets Barrier Physics<\/h2>\n<p>Three converging forces explain the timing. First, EU PPWR (2024\/1991) recyclability design criteria and plastic reduction targets make mono-material fibre formats commercially safer than multi-laminate plastic trays. Second, PFAS restrictions have eliminated legacy fluorochemical grease barriers, opening the field for starch-based systems like the UPM\/Ingredion\/Paramelt development. Third, e-commerce and DTC food shipping have raised transit-stakes: a resealable fibre tray is only viable if it survives ISTA 3A drop and vibration sequences inside an ECT-32 or ECT-44 corrugated shipper.<\/p>\n<p>Engineers should note the mechanical trade-off: fibre trays typically show lower wet stiffness than APET\/CPET equivalents, so wall thickness and rib geometry must compensate. As a typical industry reference value, a 0.8\u20131.2 mm caliper moulded or folded fibre tray wall is a common starting point before FEA or physical prototyping \u2014 TadaPack&#8217;s structural prototyping service can validate dielines and corner radii before tooling commitment.<\/p>\n<div style=\"margin:18px 0;padding:14px 18px;background:#eff6ff;border-radius:8px;border:1px solid #bfdbfe;\"><strong>\u3010\ud83d\udca1 Packaging Engineer&#8217;s Quick Q&amp;A\u3011<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Q:<\/strong> If McKee&#8217;s formula derives box compression strength (BCT) from ECT, why do food-brand POs still mandate Mullen burst testing?<\/p>\n<p><strong>A:<\/strong> Direct answer: because burst (TAPPI T810) is an out-of-plane fabric integrity metric, not a stacking metric \u2014 it catches fibre tearing and delamination that ECT cannot. Mechanical reason: McKee (BCT \u2248 5.87 \u00d7 ECT \u00d7 \u221a(caliper \u00d7 perimeter), typical industry form) assumes uniform column crush; burst testing flags local web defects from coating or plies. Procurement recommendation: accept ECT-based BCT for stacking specification, retain Mullen only as an incoming-material QC gate on coated barrier boards where lamination integrity is the risk.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2>Impact on Buyers and Makers: Cost, Spec and Qualification Math<\/h2>\n<p>For procurement directors, the format decision is a BOM and logistics calculation, not a sustainability gesture. A hypothetical worked example (illustrative only): replacing a 350gsm CCNB carton with a ~450gsm high-caliper laminated FBB for a premium food SKU may add 10\u201320% board cost per typical industry reference pricing, but eliminates greyboard laminating labour and one logistics step \u2014 often netting 5\u20138% landed cost reduction at scale. Barrier film swaps (metallized BOPP vs. multi-layer laminate) improve recyclability classification under PPWR while typically holding OTR\/GTR within film supplier datasheets, not converter claims.<\/p>\n<p>Shipper specification remains unchanged by any of this: the corrugated master must still meet ECT-32 for single-stack ambient distribution or ECT-44 for double-stack\/high-humidity lanes, verified per ASTM D642 or TAPPI T811, then validated through ISTA 3A. Per FTC Green Guides (16 CFR Part 260), any &#8216;recyclable&#8217; claim on the new fibre formats must be substantiated by the share of facilities actually recycling the substrate \u2014 starch-barrier paper claims deserve particular scrutiny.<\/p>\n<h2>Recommended Actions: A Four-Step Qualification SOP<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Step 1 \u2014 Screen substrates on data, not claims.<\/strong> Request Cobb 60 (ISO 535), ECT (TAPPI T811), and caliper (TAPPI T411, \u00b10.05 mm typical repeatability) datasheets; condition all samples at 23\u00b0C \u00b1 1\u00b0C, 50% \u00b1 2% RH per ISO 186 \/ ASTM D685 before comparison.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 2 \u2014 Run the barrier stack audit.<\/strong> Map every layer against PPWR design-for-recycling criteria; where grease resistance is the only plastic function, trial starch-based barrier papers (UPM\/Ingredion\/Paramelt class) before committing to film laminates.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 3 \u2014 Validate transit by formula, then by test.<\/strong> Estimate BCT via McKee from the chosen ECT and caliper, derate 20\u201330% for ocean humidity and warehouse dwell (typical industry derating practice), then confirm through ISTA 3A sequences per ASTM D4169 distribution-cycle alignment. Cross-check stacking loads at https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 4 \u2014 Prototype closure and resealability early.<\/strong> Resealable fibre trays (Cirkla\/Belmark\/Ossid class) and Ziploc-in-box upgrades change dieline tolerances; short-run prototyping of \u00b10.15 mm die registration and 45-durometer creasing matrices catches flap-popping before tooling.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Defect diagnostics:<\/strong> Flap popping on high-caliper FBB usually traces to creasing matrix width mismatched to caliper \u2014 switch to a wider matrix channel and verify crease depth at 60\u201370% of board caliper (typical reference practice). Adhesive debonding of laminated boards under ocean humidity points to insufficient wet-strength adhesive or Cobb 60 overshoot on the outer ply; require humidity-aged bond testing before pacific-lane shipment.<\/p>\n<p>Buyers ready to convert this trend brief into a spec should use TadaPack&#8217;s free calculators (https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools) for BCT, stacking and dimensional-weight exposure, and engage TadaPack structural prototyping for resealable tray and high-caliper carton dielines.<\/p>\n<section class=\"authority-references\" style=\"margin-top:36px;padding:20px 24px;background:#f8fafc;border-top:2px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:6px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin-top:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;\">References &amp; Standards Cited<\/h3>\n<ol style=\"margin:10px 0 0 0;padding-left:20px;font-size:13px;color:#475569;line-height:1.8;\">\n<li>\n      <strong>Packaging Europe \/ Innovation Horizon\uff1aFood<\/strong> \u2014 Technical Guidelines and Testing Benchmarks. Accessible via official authority repository: <a href=\"https:\/\/packagingeurope.com\/food\/290.subject?page=122\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#2563eb;text-decoration:underline;\">https:\/\/packagingeurope.com\/food\/290.subject?page=122<\/a>\n    <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/section>\n<\/article>\n<section class=\"topic-cluster-links\" style=\"margin-top:28px;padding:16px 20px;background:#f8fafc;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:6px;\"><h3 style=\"margin-top:0;font-size:17px;color:#1e293b;\">Recommended Engineering Reading<\/h3>\n<ul style=\"margin-bottom:0;padding-left:20px;color:#3b82f6;line-height:1.7;\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/tuck-top-mailer-box-nearby-sourcing-specs-cost-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tuck Top Mailer Box Nearby: Sourcing Specs &#038; Cost Guide<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/barrier-coatings-for-ppwr-supd-paper-packaging-specs-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Barrier Coatings for PPWR &#038; SUPD Paper Packaging: Specs &#038; Guide<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/section>\n<section class=\"tools-recom-box\" style=\"margin-top:24px;padding:20px;background:#f8fafc;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-left:4px solid #2563eb;border-radius:8px;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,'Segoe UI',Roboto,sans-serif;\"><div style=\"display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;margin-bottom:14px;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:8px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0;font-size:16px;font-weight:700;color:#0f172a;\"><span style=\"color:#2563eb;font-weight:700;\">[TOOLS]<\/span> Featured Engineering &#038; Calculation Tools<\/h3>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" style=\"font-size:13px;color:#2563eb;text-decoration:none;font-weight:500;\">Explore 70+ Packaging Tools \u2794<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"tools-grid\" style=\"display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr));gap:14px;margin-top:10px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/box-compression-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">BCT &#038; Stacking<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Box Compression (BCT) Calculator<\/h4>\nPredict box compressive limit and stacking safety factors via McKee formula.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/tools\/edge-crush-test-calculator\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" class=\"tool-card\" style=\"display:flex;flex-direction:column;justify-content:space-between;background:#ffffff;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:16px;text-decoration:none;color:inherit;transition:all 0.2s;\">\n<div><span style=\"display:inline-block;font-size:11px;font-weight:600;color:#2563eb;background:#eff6ff;padding:3px 8px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:8px;\">ECT Testing<\/span>\n<h4 style=\"font-size:15px;font-weight:700;color:#1e293b;margin:0 0 6px 0;line-height:1.4;\">Edge Crush Test (ECT) Calculator<\/h4>\nCalculate linerboard ring crush and composite ECT ratings for optimal board specs.\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex;align-items:center;justify-content:space-between;margin-top:14px;padding-top:10px;border-top:1px dashed #f1f5f9;font-size:12px;color:#2563eb;font-weight:600;\"><span style=\"color:#10b981;background:#ecfdf5;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;font-size:11px;font-weight:500;\">100% Free<\/span><span>Calculate Online \u2794<\/span><\/div>\n<\/a><\/div><\/section>\n<p><!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<!-- Google & AI GEO Schema.org Structured Data --><br \/>\n<!-- ========================================= --><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Barrier films, fibre trays &#038; folding boxboard engineering: ECT, Cobb 60, PPWR recyclability specs plus TadaPack calculators for dieline &#038; BCT validation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4439,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-custom-packaging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4440"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4440\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4439"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}