{"id":661,"date":"2026-09-09T03:48:40","date_gmt":"2026-09-09T03:48:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pfas-food-packaging-state-regulations\/"},"modified":"2026-09-09T03:48:40","modified_gmt":"2026-09-09T03:48:40","slug":"pfas-food-packaging-state-regulations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pfas-food-packaging-state-regulations\/","title":{"rendered":"PFAS Food Packaging State Regulations: B2B Compliance Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"geo-direct-answer-box\" style=\"background:#f0f9ff; border:1px solid #bae6fd; border-left:5px solid #0284c7; border-radius:8px; padding:20px 24px; margin:24px 0 32px 0;\">\n<h4 style=\"margin:0 0 12px 0; color:#0369a1; font-size:1.1rem; display:flex; align-items:center; gap:8px;\">\n    <span>\u26a1<\/span> <strong>Key Takeaways &#038; Direct Technical Answer<\/strong><br \/>\n  <\/h4>\n<ul style=\"margin:0; padding-left:20px; line-height:1.7; color:#0c4a6e; font-size:0.95rem;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Eleven U.S. states now restrict intentionally added PFAS in food contact materials, with total organic fluorine (TOF) limits typically at 50\u2013100 ppm.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Grease-resistant performance must now come from mechanical refining, aqueous barrier coatings, or mono-material structures \u2014 not fluorochemical sizing.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Pairing PFAS bans with EPR fee modulation makes non-compliant fiber packaging economically unviable by 2027.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Verification requires third-party TOF testing per TAPPI\/BISSC-aligned protocols plus supplier declarations of formulation (SDFs).<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem;'>PFAS Food Packaging State Regulations: B2B Compliance Guide<\/h2>\n<div class=\"post-featured-image\" style=\"margin:28px 0 32px 0; text-align:center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.unsplash.com\/photo-1460925895917-afdab827c52f?auto=format&#038;fit=crop&#038;w=1200&#038;q=80\" alt=\"pfas food packaging state regulations - Packaging Lifecycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Metrics (TadaPack Engineering Guide)\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:12px; box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.07); border:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size:0.84rem; color:#64748b; margin-top:10px; font-style:italic;\">pfas food packaging state regulations &#8211; Packaging Lifecycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Metrics (TadaPack Engineering Guide)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) \u2014 the fluorocarbon chemistries historically used to impart oil and grease resistance to paperboard \u2014 are now the single largest compliance risk in fiber-based food packaging. As of 2026, eleven U.S. states restrict intentionally added PFAS in food contact materials, and the enforcement mechanism is chemical, not procedural: total organic fluorine (TOF) thresholds, typically 50 ppm for most states and 100 ppm during phase-in windows.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">For procurement leads and packaging engineers, the question is no longer whether to eliminate PFAS, but which grease-resistant substrate replaces it without sacrificing ECT, cost, or line speeds. This guide maps the regulatory landscape and the compliant technical alternatives.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>The State-by-State Regulatory Map<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Maine&#8217;s LD 1433 (enforced 2023) was the first broad restriction, followed by New York&#8217;s ECL Article 35 (banning PFAS in food packaging effective December 2022) and Washington&#8217;s RCW 70A.222. California&#8217;s SB 343 and AB 1200 extend restrictions to misleading recyclability claims and PFAS in food packaging alike. More recent entrants \u2014 Minnesota (HF 2310, effective 2025), Rhode Island, New Mexico, and Connecticut \u2014 tighten TOF reporting and extend scope beyond fiber into molded fiber trays and compostable serviceware.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">The critical engineering implication: <strong style='color:#0f172a;'>a substrate that passes California may fail Maine&#8217;s stricter reporting cadence<\/strong>, and Minnesota&#8217;s 2025 rules add documentation requirements for imported molded fiber. State fragmentation, not federal action, dictates your bill of materials.<\/p>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\" style=\"overflow-x:auto; margin: 28px 0; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.03);\">\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; background:#ffffff;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8fafc; border-bottom:2px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">State<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">TOF Limit<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Status<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">New York<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">100 ppm phase-in<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Enforced<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#fafafa; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">California<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">100 ppm<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Enforced<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Minnesota<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">50 ppm<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">2025+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#fafafa; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Maine<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">50 ppm<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Enforced<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Testing and Verification Protocols<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Regulatory compliance hinges on analytical proof. The accepted methodologies are particle-induced gamma-ray emission (PIGE) for surface fluorine per <a href=\"https:\/\/www.astm.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">ASTM D7968<\/a> and combustion ion chromatography (CIC) per TAPPI T626-aligned procedures for total TOF. Most state agencies accept either, but labs increasingly default to CIC because it captures adsorbed residues from recycled fiber inputs \u2014 a major contamination vector when OCC streams carry residual fluorochemical sizing from legacy board.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Practical threshold:<\/strong> Test finished packaging, not raw paper. Converters applying aqueous coatings can push a compliant 40 GSM base sheet above 50 ppm TOF through adhesive or additive migration. Request supplier declarations of formulation (SDFs) covering every wet-end and converting additive, not just the fiber furnish.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">For structural substrates, our guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/canadian-kraft-paper-fsc-certification\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">Canadian Kraft Paper FSC Certification<\/a> covers virgin-fiber sourcing strategies that sidestep recycled-content contamination entirely \u2014 a materially cheaper path than lab rework.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Compliant Grease-Barrier Alternatives<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Eliminating fluorochemical sizing requires replacing performance through one of four mechanisms:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Mechanical refining and densification<\/strong> \u2014 Increasing beat degree (\u00b0SR) in virgin kraft raises hydrogen bonding density, delivering KIT ratings of 6\u20138 without additives. Trade-off: higher basis weight and stiffness (good for ECT) but reduced opacity.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Aqueous barrier coatings<\/strong> \u2014 Bio-wax, PLA, and acrylic dispersion coatings achieve KIT 10\u201312 at 8\u201312 GSM coat weight. These are the current workhorse for QSR clamshells and bowls.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Extrusion PE or PP lamination<\/strong> \u2014 KIT 12+, fully recyclable in polyethylene-fiber streams where state definition permits, though heavier and less curbside-friendly.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Molded fiber with in-process densification<\/strong> \u2014 For trays and end caps, thermoformed cellulose achieves oil resistance geometrically, not chemically.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Mono-material structures dominate 2026 design briefs because they satisfy both PFAS restrictions and recyclability mandates. The EU&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/environment.ec.europa.eu\/topics\/waste-and-recycling\/packaging-waste_en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR)<\/a> takes this further, mandating recyclability grading and recycled-content minimums that compound the technical case for uncoated or water-dispersible-coated fiber \u2014 meaning a single substrate choice can clear U.S. PFAS rules, EU recyclability grades, and EPR fee modulation simultaneously.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>EPR Fee Modulation: The Economic Layer<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">California SB 54, Oregon&#8217;s program, Colorado, and Maine&#8217;s EPR frameworks all apply eco-modulated fees that penalize hard-to-recycle formats. PFAS-compliant aqueous-coated boards frequently earn lower fee tiers than extrusion-laminated alternatives because they disperse in standard repulping. Run the math: a $0.004\/unit coating premium can be offset by $0.007\/unit EPR savings in Oregon&#8217;s 2026 fee schedule. This cost inversion \u2014 regulation lowering net packaging cost \u2014 is one of the few cases where compliance pays for itself, and it should anchor your 2026\u20132027 capex planning. For a broader view on how regulatory shifts drive rebranding and substrate overhauls, see our <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/what-is-a-brand-refresh\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">Brand Refresh guide<\/a>, and for the full regulatory framework, browse the <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/compliance-and-marketing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">Global Compliance &#038; Marketing hub<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Procurement Action Plan<\/h2>\n<ul style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Audit now:<\/strong> Require TOF certificates on every SKU of food-contact fiber packaging; flag anything above 40 ppm.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Dual-spec:<\/strong> Qualify both an aqueous-coated and an uncoated refined-kraft alternative per SKU to hedge state rule changes.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Contract language:<\/strong> Mandate SDFs with change-notification clauses so additive substitutions trigger retesting.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Test at the converter:<\/strong> Validate TOF on finished, converted units \u2014 not mill-spec sheets.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">PFAS regulation is converging, not fragmenting, in direction: zero intentionally added fluorine, third-party proof, and design for repulpability. Engineers who requalify substrates against 50 ppm TOF now will avoid 2027\u20132028 forced retooling cycles.<\/p>\n<div class=\"geo-faq-section\" style=\"margin-top:40px; padding-top:24px; border-top:2px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<h2 style=\"color:#0f172a; font-size:1.45rem; margin-bottom:20px;\">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/h2>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">What is the PFAS limit in food packaging by state?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Most states enforce 100 ppm total organic fluorine (TOF) during phase-in, tightening to 50 ppm. Maine, Minnesota, and Connecticut apply the stricter 50 ppm standard as of 2026.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">How do I test packaging for PFAS compliance?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Use combustion ion chromatography (CIC) or PIGE per ASTM methods on finished converted packaging. Test at 50 ppm TOF to build margin below state thresholds.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">What replaces PFAS in grease-resistant food packaging?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Aqueous barrier coatings (bio-wax, PLA, acrylic), heavily refined virgin kraft, and densified molded fiber. These achieve KIT 6\u201312 ratings without intentionally added fluorine.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tadapack-b2b-engineering-cta\" style=\"background:linear-gradient(135deg, #0f172a 0%, #1e293b 100%); border-radius:14px; padding:28px 32px; margin:44px 0 24px 0; color:#ffffff; box-shadow:0 10px 25px -5px rgba(15,23,42,0.25); border:1px solid #334155;\">\n<div style=\"display:flex; align-items:flex-start; justify-content:space-between; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:20px;\">\n<div style=\"max-width:640px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:0.8rem; font-weight:700; color:#38bdf8; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:0.06em; margin-bottom:6px;\">\n        \u2699\ufe0f TadaPack Industrial Packaging Engineering\n      <\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color:#ffffff; margin:0 0 10px 0; font-size:1.35rem; font-weight:800; line-height:1.35;\">\n        Engineering Your Next High-Performance Packaging Batch<br \/>\n      <\/h3>\n<p style=\"color:#94a3b8; font-size:0.92rem; line-height:1.65; margin:0;\">\n        From precision CAD dielines to ISTA drop-testing and certified sustainable substrates, TadaPack helps global brands optimize freight cubic volume, minimize shipping breakage, and satisfy European PPWR \/ EPR packaging standards.\n      <\/p>\n<div style=\"display:flex; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:16px; margin-top:14px; font-size:0.82rem; color:#cbd5e1;\">\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>Free CAD Dielines (.AI \/ .DXF)<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>Drop-Test &#038; ECT Optimization<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>PPWR &#038; FSC Compliant<\/strong><\/span>\n      <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex; align-items:center; align-self:center;\">\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"background:#0284c7; color:#ffffff; padding:12px 24px; border-radius:8px; font-weight:700; font-size:0.95rem; text-decoration:none; display:inline-block; transition:all 0.2s; box-shadow:0 4px 12px rgba(2,132,199,0.35);\"><br \/>\n        Request Engineering Sample &rarr;<br \/>\n      <\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@graph\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Article\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pfas-food-packaging-state-regulations\/#article\",\n      \"headline\": \"PFAS Food Packaging State Regulations: B2B Compliance Guide\",\n      \"description\": \"A structural engineer's guide to PFAS food packaging state regulations: banned substrates, compliant barriers, test thresholds, and 2026 procurement strategy.\",\n      \"mainEntityOfPage\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pfas-food-packaging-state-regulations\/\",\n      \"author\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Person\",\n        \"name\": \"Naomi Tanaka\",\n        \"jobTitle\": \"Smart Packaging & Dynamic Serialization Lead\",\n        \"worksFor\": {\n          \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n          \"name\": \"TadaPack\",\n          \"url\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\"\n        }\n      },\n      \"publisher\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n        \"name\": \"TadaPack\",\n        \"url\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pfas-food-packaging-state-regulations\/#faq\",\n      \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What is the PFAS limit in food packaging by state?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Most states enforce 100 ppm total organic fluorine (TOF) during phase-in, tightening to 50 ppm. Maine, Minnesota, and Connecticut apply the stricter 50 ppm standard as of 2026.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"How do I test packaging for PFAS compliance?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Use combustion ion chromatography (CIC) or PIGE per ASTM methods on finished converted packaging. Test at 50 ppm TOF to build margin below state thresholds.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What replaces PFAS in grease-resistant food packaging?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Aqueous barrier coatings (bio-wax, PLA, acrylic), heavily refined virgin kraft, and densified molded fiber. These achieve KIT 6\u201312 ratings without intentionally added fluorine.\"}}]\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A structural engineer&#8217;s guide to PFAS food packaging state regulations: banned substrates, compliant barriers, test thresholds, and 2026 procurement strategy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[412,20,423],"class_list":["post-661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-compliance-and-marketing","tag-epr-packaging","tag-fsc-certified","tag-pfas-free-packaging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/661\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}