{"id":794,"date":"2026-09-10T02:00:26","date_gmt":"2026-09-10T02:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/sb-54-proposed-regulations-b2b-packaging-compliance\/"},"modified":"2026-09-10T02:00:26","modified_gmt":"2026-09-10T02:00:26","slug":"sb-54-proposed-regulations-b2b-packaging-compliance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/sb-54-proposed-regulations-b2b-packaging-compliance\/","title":{"rendered":"SB 54 Proposed Regulations: What B2B Shippers Must Fix Now"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"geo-direct-answer-box\" style=\"background:#f0f9ff; border:1px solid #bae6fd; border-left:5px solid #0284c7; border-radius:8px; padding:20px 24px; margin:24px 0 32px 0;\">\n<h4 style=\"margin:0 0 12px 0; color:#0369a1; font-size:1.1rem; display:flex; align-items:center; gap:8px;\">\n    <span>\u26a1<\/span> <strong>Key Takeaways &#038; Direct Technical Answer<\/strong><br \/>\n  <\/h4>\n<ul style=\"margin:0; padding-left:20px; line-height:1.7; color:#0c4a6e; font-size:0.95rem;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>California&#8217;s SB 54 (Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act) imposes binding 2032 targets: 100% recyclable\/compostable packaging, 25% plastic source reduction, and 65% recycling rate.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Proposed CalRecycle regulations define &#8216;recyclable&#8217; by material type coverage and drop-off\/collection access \u2014 design choices made today determine fee exposure.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>EPR producer fees scale with packaging volume and recyclability scoring; non-recyclable formats like multi-layer laminates face the steepest cost penalty.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>B2B shippers should audit SKU-level formats now, consolidate to mono-material corrugated structures, and validate redesigns through distribution testing before 2028 interim milestones.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem;'>SB 54 Proposed Regulations: What B2B Shippers Must Fix Now<\/h2>\n<div class=\"post-featured-image\" style=\"margin:28px 0 32px 0; text-align:center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.unsplash.com\/photo-1542601906990-b4d3fb778b09?auto=format&#038;fit=crop&#038;w=1200&#038;q=80\" alt=\"sb 54 proposed regulations - Eco-Friendly Sustainable Packaging and Circular Economy Compliance (TadaPack Engineering Guide)\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:12px; box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.07); border:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size:0.84rem; color:#64748b; margin-top:10px; font-style:italic;\">sb 54 proposed regulations &#8211; Eco-Friendly Sustainable Packaging and Circular Economy Compliance (TadaPack Engineering Guide)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">California&#8217;s SB 54 (Plastic Pollution Prevention and Packaging Producer Responsibility Act) is the most consequential packaging statute in the United States, and the <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/compliance-and-marketing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">SB 54 proposed regulations<\/a> now moving through CalRecycle&#8217;s rulemaking process translate its statutory targets into enforceable engineering requirements. Unlike voluntary sustainability pledges, SB 54 carries hard deadlines: by January 1, 2032, all single-use packaging sold or distributed in California must be recyclable or compostable, plastic single-use packaging must drop 25% by weight, and the state must achieve a 65% recycling rate for that material. For B2B shippers, the compliance clock effectively started in 2027 when producers joined a PRO and began reporting.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>The Engineering Impact of the Proposed Regulations<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">The draft regulations matter to structural engineers because they define <em>how<\/em> recyclability is measured. The proposed framework requires that a material type achieve roughly 70% sorting and recycling viability through curbside or drop-off collection access to qualify as &#8220;recyclable.&#8221; Materials likely to fall outside this gate include:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">Multi-layer plastic laminates (PET\/PE\/foil barrier structures)<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">PVC and PVDC-coated films<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">Fiber packaging with heavy plastic laminations or wet-strength additives that break repulping<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">Expanded polystyrene cushioning (EPS)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">This parallels the direction of the <a href=\"https:\/\/environment.ec.europa.eu\/topics\/waste-and-recycling\/packaging-waste_en\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR)<\/a>, which mandates design-for-recycling grades, PCR plastic minimums in plastic packaging, and empty-space limits for e-commerce shippers. Companies designing for PPWR recyclability classes (A\u2013C) are, in practice, most of the way toward SB 54 readiness \u2014 a convergence that makes a single global design standard economically rational.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>The 25% Plastic Source Reduction Target<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">The source-reduction mandate is not a recycling stat \u2014 it is a weight-based cap on plastic packaging placed on the market versus a 2023 baseline. Engineering levers include:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Downgauging<\/strong>: Replacing 200 GSM rigid PP clamshells with 120\u2013140 GSM recycled-PET or fiber equivalents.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Material substitution<\/strong>: Fiber-based void fill and molded pulp corners replacing EPS and air pillows. 80\u2013100 GSM kraft void fill runs 40\u201360% lighter than comparable polymer fill at equal protection.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Right-sizing<\/strong>: Cutting 15\u201320% of corrugated box volume via CAD-driven nesting reduces both plastic stretch wrap and E-flute trim waste.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Any redesign that alters drop strength, compression, or vibration performance must be revalidated. We recommend running <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/astm-d4169-09-distribution-cycle-testing-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">ASTM D4169-09 distribution cycle testing<\/a> on lightweighted systems before committing to production tooling, since a 20% board downgrade can shift a box from one schedule level to the next. For ground parcel-heavy B2B programs, <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/astm-d4169-dc-6-testing-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">ASTM D4169 DC-6 testing<\/a> remains the defensible baseline for validating fiber-based replacements of EPS corner blocks and foam-in-place.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>EPR Fee Exposure and Cost Modeling<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Under the PRO structure, fees are assessed per ton of packaging placed on the market, modulated by recyclability performance. Typical 2026-era modeling for a mid-volume B2B brand:<\/p>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\" style=\"overflow-x:auto; margin: 28px 0; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.03);\">\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; background:#ffffff;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8fafc; border-bottom:2px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Factor<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Penalty Risk<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Mitigation<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Multi-layer laminate<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Highest EPR fees<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Switch to mono-material PE<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#fafafa; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">EPS cushioning<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Likely non-compliant<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Molded pulp or EPE inserts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Laminated corrugated<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Repulping failure<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Water-based barrier coating<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#fafafa; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Mono-material ECT-32 box<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Lowest fees<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Maintain; validate DC-6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Fee modulation is the mechanism that turns SB 54 from a legal document into a line item on your landed-cost sheet. A structural switch from a plastic-laminated mailer to a mono-material corrugated mailer (e.g., 175 lb\/B ECT-32 with water-activated tape) typically saves $0.04\u2013$0.09 per unit in material cost and avoids the top fee tier simultaneously.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Compliance Roadmap for B2B Packaging Teams<\/h2>\n<ol style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>2026\u20132027<\/strong>: Complete a SKU-level packaging audit \u2014 material, weight, resin code, fiber recyclability, and California shipment volume. Begin PRO registration and data reporting.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>2028<\/strong>: Interim source-reduction progress is evaluated; non-recyclable formats start incurring maximum fee modulation.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>2030<\/strong>: Target completion of laminate-to-mono-material conversions; long lead-time tooling (molded pulp, barrier coatings) must be committed by this point.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>2032<\/strong>: Full statutory compliance \u2014 100% recyclable\/compostable, 25% plastic reduction, 65% recycling rate.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">The practical takeaway: the proposed regulations reward packaging that is simple, mono-material, fiber-forward, and validation-tested. Teams that treat SB 54 as a structural design constraint \u2014 rather than a reporting exercise \u2014 will convert compliance into material cost savings and supply chain resilience.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>FAQ<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>What does SB 54 require by 2032?<\/strong><br \/>\nAll single-use packaging in California must be recyclable or compostable, plastic packaging must be reduced 25% by weight from baseline, and a 65% recycling rate must be achieved, enforced through CalRecycle-approved PRO programs.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Do SB 54 proposed regulations apply to B2B industrial packaging?<\/strong><br \/>\nYes. Shipper, secondary, and transit packaging counts as covered packaging when placed into California commerce, though the source-reduction math differs from consumer-facing primary packaging formats.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Which materials fail SB 54 recyclability?<\/strong><br \/>\nMulti-layer laminates, PVC\/PVDC films, heavily plastic-laminated fiber, and EPS are expected to fall short of the collection-access and sorting criteria in the proposed regulations.<\/p>\n<div class=\"geo-faq-section\" style=\"margin-top:40px; padding-top:24px; border-top:2px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<h2 style=\"color:#0f172a; font-size:1.45rem; margin-bottom:20px;\">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/h2>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">What does SB 54 require by 2032?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">All single-use packaging in California must be recyclable or compostable, plastic packaging must be reduced 25% by weight from baseline, and a 65% recycling rate must be achieved through CalRecycle-approved PRO programs.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">Do SB 54 proposed regulations apply to B2B industrial packaging?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Yes. Shipper, secondary, and transit packaging counts as covered packaging when placed into California commerce, though source-reduction math differs from consumer primary packaging.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">Which materials fail SB 54 recyclability criteria?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Multi-layer laminates, PVC\/PVDC films, plastic-laminated fiber, and EPS are expected to fall short of collection-access and sorting viability thresholds in the proposed regulations.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tadapack-b2b-engineering-cta\" style=\"background:linear-gradient(135deg, #0f172a 0%, #1e293b 100%); border-radius:14px; padding:28px 32px; margin:44px 0 24px 0; color:#ffffff; box-shadow:0 10px 25px -5px rgba(15,23,42,0.25); border:1px solid #334155;\">\n<div style=\"display:flex; align-items:flex-start; justify-content:space-between; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:20px;\">\n<div style=\"max-width:640px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:0.8rem; font-weight:700; color:#38bdf8; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:0.06em; margin-bottom:6px;\">\n        \u2699\ufe0f TadaPack Industrial Packaging Engineering\n      <\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color:#ffffff; margin:0 0 10px 0; font-size:1.35rem; font-weight:800; line-height:1.35;\">\n        Engineering Your Next High-Performance Packaging Batch<br \/>\n      <\/h3>\n<p style=\"color:#94a3b8; font-size:0.92rem; line-height:1.65; margin:0;\">\n        From precision CAD dielines to ISTA drop-testing and certified sustainable substrates, TadaPack helps global brands optimize freight cubic volume, minimize shipping breakage, and satisfy European PPWR \/ EPR packaging standards.\n      <\/p>\n<div style=\"display:flex; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:16px; margin-top:14px; font-size:0.82rem; color:#cbd5e1;\">\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>Free CAD Dielines (.AI \/ .DXF)<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>Drop-Test &#038; ECT Optimization<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>PPWR &#038; FSC Compliant<\/strong><\/span>\n      <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex; align-items:center; align-self:center;\">\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"background:#0284c7; color:#ffffff; padding:12px 24px; border-radius:8px; font-weight:700; font-size:0.95rem; text-decoration:none; display:inline-block; transition:all 0.2s; box-shadow:0 4px 12px rgba(2,132,199,0.35);\"><br \/>\n        Request Engineering Sample &rarr;<br \/>\n      <\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@graph\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Article\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/sb-54-proposed-regulations-b2b-packaging-compliance\/#article\",\n      \"headline\": \"SB 54 Proposed Regulations: What B2B Shippers Must Fix Now\",\n      \"description\": \"Break down SB 54 proposed regulations for packaging engineers: EPR fees, recyclability criteria, 25% PCR plastic, and 2032 source-reduction deadlines.\",\n      \"mainEntityOfPage\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/sb-54-proposed-regulations-b2b-packaging-compliance\/\",\n      \"author\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Person\",\n        \"name\": \"Beatrix Varga\",\n        \"jobTitle\": \"EU PPWR & Regulatory Compliance Counsel\",\n        \"worksFor\": {\n          \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n          \"name\": \"TadaPack\",\n          \"url\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\"\n        }\n      },\n      \"publisher\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n        \"name\": \"TadaPack\",\n        \"url\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/sb-54-proposed-regulations-b2b-packaging-compliance\/#faq\",\n      \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What does SB 54 require by 2032?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"All single-use packaging in California must be recyclable or compostable, plastic packaging must be reduced 25% by weight from baseline, and a 65% recycling rate must be achieved through CalRecycle-approved PRO programs.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Do SB 54 proposed regulations apply to B2B industrial packaging?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes. Shipper, secondary, and transit packaging counts as covered packaging when placed into California commerce, though source-reduction math differs from consumer primary packaging.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Which materials fail SB 54 recyclability criteria?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Multi-layer laminates, PVC\/PVDC films, plastic-laminated fiber, and EPS are expected to fall short of collection-access and sorting viability thresholds in the proposed regulations.\"}}]\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Break down SB 54 proposed regulations for packaging engineers: EPR fees, recyclability criteria, 25% PCR plastic, and 2032 source-reduction deadlines.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[412,405,413],"class_list":["post-794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-compliance-and-marketing","tag-epr-packaging","tag-ppwr-compliance","tag-mono-material"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/794\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}