{"id":866,"date":"2026-09-10T09:12:21","date_gmt":"2026-09-10T09:12:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/ista-procedure-3a-2018-guide\/"},"modified":"2026-09-10T09:12:21","modified_gmt":"2026-09-10T09:12:21","slug":"ista-procedure-3a-2018-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/ista-procedure-3a-2018-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"ISTA Procedure 3A 2018: Engineer&#8217;s Guide to Parcel Testing"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"geo-direct-answer-box\" style=\"background:#f0f9ff; border:1px solid #bae6fd; border-left:5px solid #0284c7; border-radius:8px; padding:20px 24px; margin:24px 0 32px 0;\">\n<h4 style=\"margin:0 0 12px 0; color:#0369a1; font-size:1.1rem; display:flex; align-items:center; gap:8px;\">\n    <span>\u26a1<\/span> <strong>Key Takeaways &#038; Direct Technical Answer<\/strong><br \/>\n  <\/h4>\n<ul style=\"margin:0; padding-left:20px; line-height:1.7; color:#0c4a6e; font-size:0.95rem;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>ISTA 3A 2018 is the general simulation performance test for single parcels shipped via a nationwide carrier network.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>It combines atmospheric conditioning, shock, vibration, and drop sequences calibrated to real parcel-network hazards.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Pass criteria are sample survival plus product integrity \u2014 not lab optics.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>3A-validated designs lower damage claims and support EPR fee modulation and right-sizing strategies.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem;'>ISTA Procedure 3A 2018: A Structural Engineer&#8217;s Guide to Parcel Simulation Testing<\/h2>\n<div class=\"post-featured-image\" style=\"margin:28px 0 32px 0; text-align:center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.unsplash.com\/photo-1460925895917-afdab827c52f?auto=format&#038;fit=crop&#038;w=1200&#038;q=80\" alt=\"ista procedure 3a 2018 - Packaging Lifecycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Metrics (TadaPack Engineering Guide)\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:12px; box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.07); border:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size:0.84rem; color:#64748b; margin-top:10px; font-style:italic;\">ista procedure 3a 2018 &#8211; Packaging Lifecycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Metrics (TadaPack Engineering Guide)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">ISTA Procedure 3A (2018 revision) remains the de facto general simulation standard for single-parcel distribution in 2026. Unlike the pre-simulation 1A series, 3A models actual parcel-network hazards \u2014 vibrational spectra, shock pulses, and drop energy recorded from real carrier handling data. For B2B shippers, passing 3A is not a lab exercise; it is direct evidence your pack survives the same environment as your warranty exposure. For broader regulatory context, see our <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/compliance-and-marketing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">Global Compliance &#038; Marketing<\/a> hub.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>What ISTA 3A 2018 Actually Tests<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">3A 2018 divides parcels into four categories \u2014 Standard, Small, Flat, and Elongated \u2014 each with defined dimensional limits and tailored sequences. A Standard parcel (\u2264 68 kg) undergoes:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Atmospheric conditioning<\/strong> at ambient (23\u00b0C \/ 50% RH) or defined temperature\/humidity, per <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/epr-non-household-packaging-guide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">EPR Non-Household Packaging: B2B Compliance Guide<\/a> supply-chain assumptions.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Shock<\/strong> \u2014 rotational flat drop, edge, and corner drops on a programmable or free-fall drop tester. Standard parcels drop from 230 mm (heavy) up to 920 mm (\u2264 9 kg) depending on gross weight.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Random vibration<\/strong> \u2014 overall GRMS levels of ~0.54 GRMS for top-load compression-and-vibration stacking, plus repetitive shock on some categories.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Low-pressure (optional)<\/strong> \u2014 for air transport at 4,267 m altitude equivalent, relevant for cross-border e-commerce.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">The 2018 revision refined random vibration spectra and drop sequences relative to older 3A versions, tightening correlation with observed parcel-network damage data. If you are still validating against a 2012 or 2014 revision, your results may not satisfy today&#8217;s retailer onboarding programs (Amazon SIPP, Walmart fleets) that increasingly reference the current revision explicitly.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>3A vs 2A vs ISTA 6-Amazon: Selection Matrix<\/h2>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\" style=\"overflow-x:auto; margin: 28px 0; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.03);\">\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; background:#ffffff;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8fafc; border-bottom:2px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Test<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Distribution<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Best For<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">ISTA 3A 2018<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Single parcel, carrier<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">E-commerce, D2C<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#fafafa; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">ISTA 2A<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Partial simulation<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Budget pre-qualification<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">ISTA 6-Amazon<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Amazon network<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">SIPP\/FFP programs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">For palletized LTL shipments, ISTA 3E or 3H apply instead \u2014 running 3A on a palletized B2B load produces invalid results and a false sense of security.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Sample Requirements and Failure Criteria<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Per protocol, a minimum of <strong style='color:#0f172a;'>one replicate sample per test sequence<\/strong> is required, though we specify <strong style='color:#0f172a;'>three replicates<\/strong> for production-intent samples to capture corrugated board variability. Always test the finished pack at minimum certified board specification \u2014 if your spec calls for 32 ECT C-flute (\u2248 4.0 mm flute height, ~150 GSM liner), verify incoming board meets it before conditioning.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Failure is any of:<br \/>\n&#8211; Product damage (functional or cosmetic, per agreed AQL)<br \/>\n&#8211; Package failure enabling product loss (burst, delamination, closure failure)<br \/>\n&#8211; Loss of stackability or handling integrity post-sequence<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Document all results against ISO\/IEC 17025-accredited lab procedures for defensibility in carrier damage claims and retailer disputes.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Cost and Timeline Benchmarks (2026)<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Typical North American lab pricing: <strong style='color:#0f172a;'>$1,800\u2013$4,500 per 3A sequence<\/strong> depending on parcel category, atmospheric conditioning complexity, and replicate count. Turnaround runs <strong style='color:#0f172a;'>3\u20137 business days<\/strong> including conditioning time. Budget an additional 15\u201320% for re-tests after initial design iteration \u2014 plan for at least two design-validation cycles on new structural launches.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>3A Testing, Right-Sizing, and EPR Fee Modulation<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">A passing 3A report is your engineering license to downgauge. Once the pack is proven at the distribution hazard level, you can safely:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Reduce board grade<\/strong> \u2014 move from double-wall BC-flute (\u2248 7.0 mm) to single-wall C-flute, cutting ~18% material cost per shipper.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Eliminate void fill<\/strong> \u2014 3A-validated suspension or retention designs replace loose fill, reducing DIM-weight billing and volumetric waste.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Right-size cartons<\/strong> \u2014 every 25 mm of excess length pushes you into the next DIM bracket and inflates <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/packaging-epr-base-fees-explained\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">Packaging EPR Base Fees: How Modulation Really Works<\/a> fee classes under ECOMOD-style eco-modulated schemes.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">2026 EPR frameworks in the EU (PPWR-driven) and US state programs (California SB 54 implementation, Oregon, Colorado, Maine) reward source reduction with lower per-tonne fee rates on paper and plastic formats. A documented 3A test record is persuasive evidence in eco-modulation audit files that your reduction claims are engineering-verified, not marketing assertions. Pair with <a href=\"https:\/\/fsc.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">FSC Chain of Custody Certification Standards<\/a> certified fiber to complete the compliance and sustainability narrative for retail buyers.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Implementation Checklist<\/h2>\n<ol style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">Classify the parcel (Standard \/ Small \/ Flat \/ Elongated) against 3A 2018 dimensional limits.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">Define product fragility (G-level) and acceptable cosmetic AQL with stakeholders before testing.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">Test minimum three replicates at production board specification.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">Archive the lab report with board certs (ECT\/Mullen, FSC status) for EPR and retailer audits.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">Re-validate after any material substitution, flute change, or dimensional revision.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Running 3A 2018 correctly converts packaging from a cost center into a defensible engineering asset \u2014 lower claims, lower DIM-weight spend, and documented regulatory readiness.<\/p>\n<div class=\"geo-faq-section\" style=\"margin-top:40px; padding-top:24px; border-top:2px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<h2 style=\"color:#0f172a; font-size:1.45rem; margin-bottom:20px;\">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/h2>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">What is the difference between ISTA 3A and ISTA 1A?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">ISTA 1A is a non-simulation integrity test with fixed sequence order. ISTA 3A 2018 is a general simulation test replicating actual parcel-network hazards \u2014 randomized vibration spectra, weighted drop sequences, and category-specific protocols \u2014 offering higher correlation with real-world damage.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">How much does ISTA 3A testing cost?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Typical 2026 North American lab pricing is $1,800\u2013$4,500 per sequence depending on category, conditioning, and replicates, with 3\u20137 business day turnaround. Budget for at least two design-validation cycles including re-tests.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">Does ISTA 3A testing help with EPR compliance?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Indirectly and significantly. A documented 3A pass validates downgauging, right-sizing, and void-fill elimination \u2014 the source-reduction actions that earn lower eco-modulated EPR fee rates under PPWR and US state programs.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tadapack-b2b-engineering-cta\" style=\"background:linear-gradient(135deg, #0f172a 0%, #1e293b 100%); border-radius:14px; padding:28px 32px; margin:44px 0 24px 0; color:#ffffff; box-shadow:0 10px 25px -5px rgba(15,23,42,0.25); border:1px solid #334155;\">\n<div style=\"display:flex; align-items:flex-start; justify-content:space-between; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:20px;\">\n<div style=\"max-width:640px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:0.8rem; font-weight:700; color:#38bdf8; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:0.06em; margin-bottom:6px;\">\n        \u2699\ufe0f TadaPack Industrial Packaging Engineering\n      <\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color:#ffffff; margin:0 0 10px 0; font-size:1.35rem; font-weight:800; line-height:1.35;\">\n        Engineering Your Next High-Performance Packaging Batch<br \/>\n      <\/h3>\n<p style=\"color:#94a3b8; font-size:0.92rem; line-height:1.65; margin:0;\">\n        From precision CAD dielines to ISTA drop-testing and certified sustainable substrates, TadaPack helps global brands optimize freight cubic volume, minimize shipping breakage, and satisfy European PPWR \/ EPR packaging standards.\n      <\/p>\n<div style=\"display:flex; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:16px; margin-top:14px; font-size:0.82rem; color:#cbd5e1;\">\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>Free CAD Dielines (.AI \/ .DXF)<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>Drop-Test &#038; ECT Optimization<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>PPWR &#038; FSC Compliant<\/strong><\/span>\n      <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex; align-items:center; align-self:center;\">\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"background:#0284c7; color:#ffffff; padding:12px 24px; border-radius:8px; font-weight:700; font-size:0.95rem; text-decoration:none; display:inline-block; transition:all 0.2s; box-shadow:0 4px 12px rgba(2,132,199,0.35);\"><br \/>\n        Request Engineering Sample &rarr;<br \/>\n      <\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@graph\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Article\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/ista-procedure-3a-2018-guide\/#article\",\n      \"headline\": \"ISTA Procedure 3A 2018: Engineer's Guide to Parcel Testing\",\n      \"description\": \"ISTA 3A 2018 decoded: test sequences, pass\/fail criteria, costs, and how parcel-tested packaging cuts damage claims and EPR compliance risk.\",\n      \"mainEntityOfPage\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/ista-procedure-3a-2018-guide\/\",\n      \"author\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Person\",\n        \"name\": \"Beatrix Varga\",\n        \"jobTitle\": \"EU PPWR & Regulatory Compliance Counsel\",\n        \"worksFor\": {\n          \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n          \"name\": \"TadaPack\",\n          \"url\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\"\n        }\n      },\n      \"publisher\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n        \"name\": \"TadaPack\",\n        \"url\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/ista-procedure-3a-2018-guide\/#faq\",\n      \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What is the difference between ISTA 3A and ISTA 1A?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"ISTA 1A is a non-simulation integrity test with fixed sequence order. ISTA 3A 2018 is a general simulation test replicating actual parcel-network hazards \u2014 randomized vibration spectra, weighted drop sequences, and category-specific protocols \u2014 offering higher correlation with real-world damage.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"How much does ISTA 3A testing cost?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Typical 2026 North American lab pricing is $1,800\u2013$4,500 per sequence depending on category, conditioning, and replicates, with 3\u20137 business day turnaround. Budget for at least two design-validation cycles including re-tests.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Does ISTA 3A testing help with EPR compliance?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Indirectly and significantly. A documented 3A pass validates downgauging, right-sizing, and void-fill elimination \u2014 the source-reduction actions that earn lower eco-modulated EPR fee rates under PPWR and US state programs.\"}}]\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ISTA 3A 2018 decoded: test sequences, pass\/fail criteria, costs, and how parcel-tested packaging cuts damage claims and EPR compliance risk.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[406,412,411],"class_list":["post-866","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-compliance-and-marketing","tag-corrugated-flutes","tag-epr-packaging","tag-ista-testing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/866\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}