{"id":934,"date":"2026-09-11T01:00:31","date_gmt":"2026-09-11T01:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pfas-in-packaging-materials\/"},"modified":"2026-09-11T01:00:31","modified_gmt":"2026-09-11T01:00:31","slug":"pfas-in-packaging-materials","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pfas-in-packaging-materials\/","title":{"rendered":"PFAS in Packaging Materials: Compliance &#038; Substitution Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"geo-direct-answer-box\" style=\"background:#f0f9ff; border:1px solid #bae6fd; border-left:5px solid #0284c7; border-radius:8px; padding:20px 24px; margin:24px 0 32px 0;\">\n<h4 style=\"margin:0 0 12px 0; color:#0369a1; font-size:1.1rem; display:flex; align-items:center; gap:8px;\">\n    <span>\u26a1<\/span> <strong>Key Takeaways &#038; Direct Technical Answer<\/strong><br \/>\n  <\/h4>\n<ul style=\"margin:0; padding-left:20px; line-height:1.7; color:#0c4a6e; font-size:0.95rem;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>PFAS &#8216;forever chemicals&#8217; in grease-resistant food packaging face total fluorine limits of 50\u2013100 ppm across most 2026 jurisdictions.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Intentionally added PFAS are effectively banned in EU food-contact materials under the PPWR timeline and U.S. state laws.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Verified substitutions include water-based barrier coatings, PLA linings, and mechanical densification of fiber.<\/strong><\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:6px;\"><strong>Procurement must demand third-party total organic fluorine (TOF) certificates, not supplier self-declarations.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem;'>PFAS in Packaging Materials: Engineering Compliance Without Losing Grease Resistance<\/h2>\n<div class=\"post-featured-image\" style=\"margin:28px 0 32px 0; text-align:center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.unsplash.com\/photo-1607344645866-009c320c5ab8?auto=format&#038;fit=crop&#038;w=1200&#038;q=80\" alt=\"pfas in packaging materials - Recycled Kraft Paper and Sustainable Corrugated Board (TadaPack Engineering Guide)\" loading=\"lazy\" style=\"max-width:100%; height:auto; border-radius:12px; box-shadow:0 6px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.07); border:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size:0.84rem; color:#64748b; margin-top:10px; font-style:italic;\">pfas in packaging materials &#8211; Recycled Kraft Paper and Sustainable Corrugated Board (TadaPack Engineering Guide)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of ~10,000 synthetic fluorinated chemicals historically deployed in paper and board packaging for oil and grease resistance. Their extreme C\u2013F bond stability \u2014 the same property that makes them effective barriers \u2014 makes them persistent environmental contaminants. As of 2026, PFAS in packaging materials is the single most litigated compliance topic in fiber-based food packaging, with liability exposure extending to distributors and brand owners, not just converters.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">This guide covers the detection thresholds, regulatory landscape, and validated engineering substitutions for <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/materials-and-processes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">Packaging Materials &#038; Processes<\/a> teams moving to PFAS-free barrier systems.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Why PFAS Were Used: The Barrier Problem<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Fluorochemical treatments (typically side-chain fluorinated polymers applied at 0.1\u20130.5% dry solids on unbleached kraft or bleached board) provided contact angles >90\u00b0 against cooking oils at a cost of $0.01\u20130.03 per unit. No economical alternative matched this performance for decades \u2014 which is why fast-food wraps, burger clamshells, molded fiber trays, and pizza boxes remain the highest-risk categories in any audit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Non-food applications matter too: PFAS-based fluorosurfactants historically appeared in RCH (repulpable coating) aids and as wetting agents in some acrylic dispersion coatings, meaning even non-grease-resistant boards can carry incidental contamination from recycled fiber streams.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>The 2026 Regulatory Landscape<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">The compliance picture is now fragmented but converging on a de facto threshold:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>United States:<\/strong> Eleven states (CA, NY, WA, MN, CO, and others) prohibit intentionally added PFAS in food packaging, enforcing total organic fluorine (TOF) limits of 50 ppm (CA AB 2761 standard, now widely mirrored) or 100 ppm.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>EU:<\/strong> The proposed universal REACH restriction covers ~10,000 PFAS substances. In parallel, the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR, Regulation (EU) 2025\/40) drives recyclability-at-scale requirements that effectively exclude fluorochemical barrier treatments from fiber streams placed on the EU market.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Retailer specs:<\/strong> Major QSR and grocery private-label programs now independently enforce <50 ppm TOF, often stricter than statute.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Under Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) fee modulation schemes, non-recyclable and chemically treated formats carry penalty fees of 20\u2013100% on base rates, adding a direct cost dimension to PFAS elimination. Sustainable sourcing claims should also be supported by lifecycle methodology such as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/37456.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">ISO 14040 Environmental Lifecycle Assessment<\/a> when comparing substitute barrier systems \u2014 a substitution that cuts PFAS but doubles coat weight can worsen carbon footprint.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Detection and Verification: What Procurement Should Demand<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Total Organic Fluorine via Combustion Ion Chromatography (CIC, per DIN EN 17826-1) is the accepted screening method; targeted LC-MS\/MS quantifies individual compounds but misses short-chain and polymeric PFAS. A defensible supplier package in 2026 includes:<\/p>\n<ol style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">CIC-based TOF certificate per production lot, <50 ppm.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">Declaration of intentional addition signed by the legal manufacturer.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\">Raw fiber origin audit \u2014 virgin fiber runs lower incidental risk than mixed recycled furnish.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Self-declarations without analytical backing are increasingly rejected by retailer compliance teams. For context on how barrier substitution fits broader eco-design, see our engineer&#8217;s breakdown of <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/creative-eco-friendly-packaging-trends\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">Creative Eco-Friendly Packaging Trends<\/a>, and our retrospective on which <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/sustainable-packaging-trends-2021\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"color:#0284c7; text-decoration:underline; font-weight:600;\">Sustainable Packaging Trends<\/a> actually survived regulatory scrutiny \u2014 PFAS elimination being the clearest example.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Engineering Substitutions: Performance Comparison<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Replacing fluorochemical grease barriers requires matching the target Kit rating (TAPPI T 559) \u2014 typically Kit 8\u201312 for burger wraps and molded fiber serviceware.<\/p>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\" style=\"overflow-x:auto; margin: 28px 0; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:10px; box-shadow:0 2px 8px rgba(0,0,0,0.03);\">\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; background:#ffffff;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8fafc; border-bottom:2px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Barrier Technology<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Grease Performance<\/th>\n<th style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; background:#f8fafc; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700; font-size:0.92rem;\">Cost Impact<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Water-based acrylic dispersion<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Kit 8\u201312 achievable<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#059669; font-weight:600;\">+$0.02\u20130.05\/unit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#fafafa; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">PLA or PBAT bio-lining<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Kit 12+ (heat-sealable)<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#059669; font-weight:600;\">+$0.04\u20130.08\/unit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Mechanical densification (calendered fiber)<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Kit 6\u20138, mono-material<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#059669; font-weight:600;\">+$0.01\u20130.03\/unit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#fafafa; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; font-weight:600; color:#0f172a;\">Uncoated kraft (restructured format)<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Kit 1\u20134, format-dependent<\/td>\n<td style=\"border:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding:12px 16px; color:#334155; font-size:0.9rem;\">Neutral to negative<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">Key engineering caveats: dispersion coatings can raise repulping rejectables if coat weight exceeds ~15 g\/m\u00b2; PLA-lined board is compostable (EN 13432) but not kerbside-recyclable in most U.S. streams; calendered\/crinkled fiber approaches achieve grease resistance through increased apparent density (0.7\u20130.9 g\/cm\u00b3 vs. ~0.55 baseline) and remain fully repulpable \u2014 the preferred mono-material route for curbside-recyclable claims.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>Implementation Roadmap for Converters and Brands<\/h2>\n<ol style=\"margin:16px 0; padding-left:24px; line-height:1.75; color:#334155;\">\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Audit (Weeks 1\u20134):<\/strong> CIC test all SKUs in grease-contact applications; flag any result >50 ppm TOF.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Requalify (Weeks 4\u201312):<\/strong> Run ISTA transit validation plus food-simulant migration testing (EU 10\/2011 analogues where applicable) on substitute formats.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Redesign where needed:<\/strong> Use grease-resistant barrier coatings only at contact surfaces rather than a full-body fluorochemical treatment, reducing coat weight and EPR modulation fees.<\/li>\n<li style=\"margin-bottom:8px;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>Document:<\/strong> Archive lot-level analytical data for a minimum of five years \u2014 the statute of limitations trend in PFAS consumer litigation now runs past historical supplier record-keeping norms.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\">PFAS elimination is no longer a differentiator; it is table stakes. The competitive question in 2026 is which substitutes preserve structural performance and recyclability at the lowest landed cost.<\/p>\n<h2 style='color:#0f172a; margin-top:36px; margin-bottom:16px; font-size:1.5rem; border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0; padding-bottom:8px;'>FAQ<\/h2>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>What is the legal PFAS limit in food packaging?<\/strong><br \/>\nMost U.S. state laws and major retailer specs cap total organic fluorine at 50\u2013100 ppm, with 50 ppm becoming the de facto 2026 standard. Any intentionally added PFAS is prohibited regardless of concentration in the strictest regimes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>How is PFAS tested in paper packaging?<\/strong><br \/>\nTotal Organic Fluorine by Combustion Ion Chromatography (CIC) is the standard screening method because it captures all PFAS classes, including polymeric species that targeted LC-MS\/MS methods miss.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin:16px 0; line-height:1.8; color:#334155; font-size:1.02rem;\"><strong style='color:#0f172a;'>What replaces PFAS grease barriers in molded fiber and wraps?<\/strong><br \/>\nWater-based acrylic dispersion coatings, PLA bio-linings, and mechanical densification of fiber are the validated substitutes, matching Kit 8\u201312 grease ratings while preserving repulpability when coat weights are controlled.<\/p>\n<div class=\"geo-faq-section\" style=\"margin-top:40px; padding-top:24px; border-top:2px solid #e2e8f0;\">\n<h2 style=\"color:#0f172a; font-size:1.45rem; margin-bottom:20px;\">Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/h2>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">What is the legal PFAS limit in food packaging?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Most U.S. state laws and major retailer specs cap total organic fluorine at 50\u2013100 ppm, with 50 ppm becoming the de facto 2026 standard; intentionally added PFAS is prohibited outright in the strictest regimes.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">How is PFAS tested in paper packaging?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Total Organic Fluorine via Combustion Ion Chromatography (CIC, per DIN EN 17826-1) is the standard screening method because it captures all PFAS classes, including polymeric species that LC-MS\/MS misses.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc; border:1px solid #e2e8f0; border-radius:8px; padding:18px 20px; margin-bottom:14px;\">\n<h3 style=\"margin:0 0 8px 0; font-size:1.05rem; color:#0f172a; font-weight:700;\">What replaces PFAS grease barriers in molded fiber and wraps?<\/h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0; color:#475569; font-size:0.95rem; line-height:1.65;\">Water-based acrylic dispersion coatings, PLA bio-linings, and mechanical densification of fiber are validated substitutes achieving Kit 8\u201312 grease ratings while preserving repulpability at controlled coat weights.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"tadapack-b2b-engineering-cta\" style=\"background:linear-gradient(135deg, #0f172a 0%, #1e293b 100%); border-radius:14px; padding:28px 32px; margin:44px 0 24px 0; color:#ffffff; box-shadow:0 10px 25px -5px rgba(15,23,42,0.25); border:1px solid #334155;\">\n<div style=\"display:flex; align-items:flex-start; justify-content:space-between; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:20px;\">\n<div style=\"max-width:640px;\">\n<div style=\"font-size:0.8rem; font-weight:700; color:#38bdf8; text-transform:uppercase; letter-spacing:0.06em; margin-bottom:6px;\">\n        \u2699\ufe0f TadaPack Industrial Packaging Engineering\n      <\/div>\n<h3 style=\"color:#ffffff; margin:0 0 10px 0; font-size:1.35rem; font-weight:800; line-height:1.35;\">\n        Engineering Your Next High-Performance Packaging Batch<br \/>\n      <\/h3>\n<p style=\"color:#94a3b8; font-size:0.92rem; line-height:1.65; margin:0;\">\n        From precision CAD dielines to ISTA drop-testing and certified sustainable substrates, TadaPack helps global brands optimize freight cubic volume, minimize shipping breakage, and satisfy European PPWR \/ EPR packaging standards.\n      <\/p>\n<div style=\"display:flex; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:16px; margin-top:14px; font-size:0.82rem; color:#cbd5e1;\">\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>Free CAD Dielines (.AI \/ .DXF)<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>Drop-Test &#038; ECT Optimization<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n        <span>\u2713 <strong>PPWR &#038; FSC Compliant<\/strong><\/span>\n      <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div style=\"display:flex; align-items:center; align-self:center;\">\n      <a href=\"https:\/\/tadapack.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" style=\"background:#0284c7; color:#ffffff; padding:12px 24px; border-radius:8px; font-weight:700; font-size:0.95rem; text-decoration:none; display:inline-block; transition:all 0.2s; box-shadow:0 4px 12px rgba(2,132,199,0.35);\"><br \/>\n        Request Engineering Sample &rarr;<br \/>\n      <\/a>\n    <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@graph\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Article\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pfas-in-packaging-materials\/#article\",\n      \"headline\": \"PFAS in Packaging Materials: Compliance & Substitution Guide\",\n      \"description\": \"Engineer's guide to PFAS in packaging materials: detection thresholds, 2026 state and EU limits, fiber-based substitutions, and compliant grease barriers.\",\n      \"mainEntityOfPage\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pfas-in-packaging-materials\/\",\n      \"author\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Person\",\n        \"name\": \"Gabriel Silva\",\n        \"jobTitle\": \"Substrate Testing & Quality Assurance Lead\",\n        \"worksFor\": {\n          \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n          \"name\": \"TadaPack\",\n          \"url\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\"\n        }\n      },\n      \"publisher\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n        \"name\": \"TadaPack\",\n        \"url\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n      \"@id\": \"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/pfas-in-packaging-materials\/#faq\",\n      \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What is the legal PFAS limit in food packaging?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Most U.S. state laws and major retailer specs cap total organic fluorine at 50\u2013100 ppm, with 50 ppm becoming the de facto 2026 standard; intentionally added PFAS is prohibited outright in the strictest regimes.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"How is PFAS tested in paper packaging?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Total Organic Fluorine via Combustion Ion Chromatography (CIC, per DIN EN 17826-1) is the standard screening method because it captures all PFAS classes, including polymeric species that LC-MS\/MS misses.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What replaces PFAS grease barriers in molded fiber and wraps?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Water-based acrylic dispersion coatings, PLA bio-linings, and mechanical densification of fiber are validated substitutes achieving Kit 8\u201312 grease ratings while preserving repulpability at controlled coat weights.\"}}]\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Engineer&#8217;s guide to PFAS in packaging materials: detection thresholds, 2026 state and EU limits, fiber-based substitutions, and compliant grease barriers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[412,413,423],"class_list":["post-934","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-materials-and-processes","tag-epr-packaging","tag-mono-material","tag-pfas-free-packaging"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/934","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=934"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/934\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=934"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=934"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tadapack.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=934"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}